IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4796-d1662631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of a Water Reservoir Construction Project Among the Local Community and Potential Tourists and Visitors

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Machowski

    (Institute of Earth Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland)

  • Martyna A. Rzetala

    (Institute of Earth Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland)

  • Maksymilian Solarski

    (Institute of Social and Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland)

  • Mariusz Rzetala

    (Institute of Earth Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland)

  • Daniel Bakota

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Waszyngtona 4/8, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland)

  • Arkadiusz Płomiński

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Waszyngtona 4/8, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Kłosowska

    (Independent Researcher, 40-432 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

A study was conducted concerning the perceptions of a future reservoir (4.7–8.9 square kilometres, 42.2 million cubic metres) by residents, tourists, and visitors; the location in question was the former Kotlarnia sand pit in the catchment area of the Bierawka River (tributary of the Oder River in southern Poland). Divergent concepts for the reclamation and development of the former sand pit emerged; the construction of a reservoir was initially the dominant option but was eventually abandoned despite it having the greatest acceptance among the respondents (out of the 134 respondents, 43.3% favoured the creation of a water reservoir, 29.9% favoured introducing nature protection arrangements in the area to enable spontaneous nature regeneration, and 16.4% favoured reforestation). A clear discrepancy arose between the public’s expectations related to the reclamation and development of the former sand pit in order to create a reservoir and the official position of the land user and administrator of the potential reservoir, which indicated that it no longer intended to create such a reservoir. This study indicates that in the process of developing concepts related to the reclamation and development of former mineral workings, it is essential to obtain the results of public consultation based on a diagnostic survey conducted among representatives of the local community. This is an effective tool for predicting the optimal use of sites regenerated after the damage caused by open-pit mining provided that all technical considerations related to the planned project are taken into account in advance.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Machowski & Martyna A. Rzetala & Maksymilian Solarski & Mariusz Rzetala & Daniel Bakota & Arkadiusz Płomiński & Katarzyna Kłosowska, 2025. "Perceptions of a Water Reservoir Construction Project Among the Local Community and Potential Tourists and Visitors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4796-:d:1662631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4796-:d:1662631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.