IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4796-d1662631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of a Water Reservoir Construction Project Among the Local Community and Potential Tourists and Visitors

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Machowski

    (Institute of Earth Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland)

  • Martyna A. Rzetala

    (Institute of Earth Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland)

  • Maksymilian Solarski

    (Institute of Social and Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland)

  • Mariusz Rzetala

    (Institute of Earth Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland)

  • Daniel Bakota

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Waszyngtona 4/8, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland)

  • Arkadiusz Płomiński

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Waszyngtona 4/8, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Kłosowska

    (Independent Researcher, 40-432 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

A study was conducted concerning the perceptions of a future reservoir (4.7–8.9 square kilometres, 42.2 million cubic metres) by residents, tourists, and visitors; the location in question was the former Kotlarnia sand pit in the catchment area of the Bierawka River (tributary of the Oder River in southern Poland). Divergent concepts for the reclamation and development of the former sand pit emerged; the construction of a reservoir was initially the dominant option but was eventually abandoned despite it having the greatest acceptance among the respondents (out of the 134 respondents, 43.3% favoured the creation of a water reservoir, 29.9% favoured introducing nature protection arrangements in the area to enable spontaneous nature regeneration, and 16.4% favoured reforestation). A clear discrepancy arose between the public’s expectations related to the reclamation and development of the former sand pit in order to create a reservoir and the official position of the land user and administrator of the potential reservoir, which indicated that it no longer intended to create such a reservoir. This study indicates that in the process of developing concepts related to the reclamation and development of former mineral workings, it is essential to obtain the results of public consultation based on a diagnostic survey conducted among representatives of the local community. This is an effective tool for predicting the optimal use of sites regenerated after the damage caused by open-pit mining provided that all technical considerations related to the planned project are taken into account in advance.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Machowski & Martyna A. Rzetala & Maksymilian Solarski & Mariusz Rzetala & Daniel Bakota & Arkadiusz Płomiński & Katarzyna Kłosowska, 2025. "Perceptions of a Water Reservoir Construction Project Among the Local Community and Potential Tourists and Visitors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4796-:d:1662631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduardo Francisco Silva & Darlisson Fernandes Bento & Anderson Conceição Mendes & Fábio Góis Mota & Luiz Carlos Silva Mota & Arthur Iven Tavares Fonseca & Rodolfo Maduro Almeida & Livaldo Oliveira San, 2020. "Environmental impacts of sand mining in the city of Santarém, Amazon region, Northern Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 47-60, January.
    2. Ferrer, Luciana Maria & Rodriguez, Daniel Andrés & Forti, Maria Cristina & Carriello, Felix, 2021. "The anthropocene landscape and ecosystem services in the closure of sand mining: Paraíba do Sul River basin – Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Marius Dan Gavriletea, 2017. "Environmental Impacts of Sand Exploitation. Analysis of Sand Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Weber, Timothy & Stocks, Ryan & Blakers, Andrew & Nadolny, Anna & Cheng, Cheng, 2024. "A global atlas of pumped hydro systems that repurpose existing mining sites," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    5. Fred A. Otchere & Marcello M. Veiga & Jennifer J. Hinton & Renato A. Farias & Robert Hamaguchi, 2004. "Transforming open mining pits into fish farms: Moving towards sustainability," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 28(3), pages 216-223, August.
    6. Sergio Makrakis & Ana P. S. Bertão & Jhony F. M. Silva & Maristela C. Makrakis & Fco. Javier Sanz-Ronda & Leandro F. Celestino, 2019. "Hydropower Development and Fishways: A Need for Connectivity in Rivers of the Upper Paraná Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Guiyuan Li & Zhanneng Wu & Guo Cheng & Yixiong Yuan & Yu He & Hechi Wang, 2023. "Research on the Spatiotemporal Dynamic Relationship between Human Activity Intensity and Ecosystem Service Value in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Mariusz Kruczek & Malgorzata Markowska & Aikaterini Servou & Christos Roumpos & Eleni Mertiri & Priscilla Ernst & Jaroslaw Darmosz & Thomas Kempka, 2025. "Navigating Socio-Technical Challenges in Energy Efficiency: Case Studies on Hybrid Pumped-Hydropower Storage in Poland and Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitrios Vlachopoulos & Rannveig Björk Thorkelsdóttir & Despoina Schina & Jóna Guðrún Jónsdóttir, 2023. "Teachers’ Experience and Perceptions of Sustainable Digitalization in School Education: An Existential Phenomenological Study of Teachers in Romania, Greece, Cyprus, Iceland, and The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Willam Trujillo & Joseph Cobo & Dayanna Vera-Cedeño & Alex Palma-Cando & Jorge Toro-Álava & Alfredo Viloria & Marvin Ricaurte, 2022. "Magnetic Separation and Enrichment of Fe–Ti Oxides from Iron Titaniferous Beach Sands: Process Design Applied to Coastal Ecuador," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Barbora Iannaccone & Lucia Domaracká & Dana Tometzová & Ľubomíra Gabániová, 2024. "Assessment of the Recreational Potential of Flooded Quarries in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Marschke, Melissa & Rousseau, Jean-François, 2022. "Sand ecologies, livelihoods and governance in Asia: A systematic scoping review," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Sun, Zhongbo & Zhao, Yixin & Bolz, Pascal & Côte, Claire & Ren, Jiandong, 2025. "A multimethod GIS-based framework for site selection of underground pumped storage power stations using closing coal mines: A case study of the Shanxi province, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Walter Leal Filho & Julian Hunt & Alexandros Lingos & Johannes Platje & Lara Werncke Vieira & Markus Will & Marius Dan Gavriletea, 2021. "The Unsustainable Use of Sand: Reporting on a Global Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Mishra, Anshumali & Das, Sarat Kumar & Reddy, Krishna R., 2023. "Life cycle triple bottom line sustainability assessment of coal mine overburden sand versus river sand," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    8. Rajiv Sinha & Kanchan Mishra & Priyesh Salunke & Vidya Sounderajan, 2023. "Sustainable Silt Management in the Lower Kosi River, North Bihar, India: Demand Assessment, Investment Model and Socio-Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Naveedh Ahmed S. & Le Hung Anh & Petra Schneider, 2020. "A DPSIR Assessment on Ecosystem Services Challenges in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: Coping with the Impacts of Sand Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
    10. Stefan Gunnarsson & Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist & Torun Wallgren & Per Hjelmstedt & Ulf Sonesson & Helena Hansson, 2020. "Systematic Mapping of Research on Farm-Level Sustainability in Finfish Aquaculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Alena Oulehlova & Irena Tušer & David Rehak, 2021. "Environmental Risk Assessment of a Diesel Fuel Tank: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Bohuslava Gregorová & Pavel Hronček & Dana Tometzová & Mário Molokáč & Vladimír Čech, 2020. "Transforming Brownfields as Tourism Destinations and Their Sustainability on the Example of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-28, December.
    13. Gao, Yuanqiang & Lei, Liuwei & Zhang, Meng & Zhao, Ziwen & Li, Jianling & Mahmud, Md Apel & Liu, Zhengguang & Li, Ming & Deng, Boren & Chen, Diyi, 2024. "Boosting floating photovoltaics via cooling methods and reservoir characteristics: Crafting optimal symbiosis with off-river pumped hydro storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    14. Lüth, Alexandra & Keles, Dogan, 2024. "Risks, strategies, and benefits of offshore energy hubs: A literature-based survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Clemens Mostert & Stefan Bringezu, 2022. "Biotic Part of the Product Material Footprint: Comparison of Indicators Regarding Their Interpretation and Applicability," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    16. John D. Morley & Rupert J. Myers & Yves Plancherel & Pablo R. Brito-Parada, 2022. "RETRACTED: A Database for the Extraction, Trade, and Use of Sand and Gravel," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Eduardo Francisco Silva & Darlisson Fernandes Bento & Anderson Conceição Mendes & Fábio Góis Mota & Luiz Carlos Silva Mota & Arthur Iven Tavares Fonseca & Rodolfo Maduro Almeida & Livaldo Oliveira San, 2020. "Environmental impacts of sand mining in the city of Santarém, Amazon region, Northern Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 47-60, January.
    18. Köse, Murat & Kul, Ali Ayhan & Özdemir, Emrah & Gürbey, Alev Perihan & Aktaş, Nilüfer Kart, 2022. "Factors affecting utilization opportunity of wetlands and their immediate surroundings in abandoned mining sites: A case study for Istanbul," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    19. Dimitra Ioannidou & Guido Sonnemann & Sangwon Suh, 2020. "Do we have enough natural sand for low‐carbon infrastructure?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1004-1015, October.
    20. John D. Morley & Rupert J. Myers & Yves Plancherel & Pablo R. Brito-Parada, 2022. "A Database for the Stocks and Flows of Sand and Gravel," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4796-:d:1662631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.