IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4768-d1662038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of Life and Energy Efficiency in Europe—A Multi-Criteria Classification of Countries and Analysis of Regional Disproportions

Author

Listed:
  • Aneta Becker

    (Department of Mathematical Applications in Economy, Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 71-270 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła

    (Department of Mathematical Applications in Economy, Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 71-270 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Energy efficiency (EE) is an important driver of quality of life (QoL), which is an overarching goal of sustainable development (SD). The levels of these phenomena in the European Union (EU) vary. Previous analyses presented in the literature have focused mainly on a one-dimensional view of EE and QoL. The authors of this article, given the multidimensional nature of the phenomena under study, present both categories from a holistic perspective. The purpose of this study was to identify the level of QoL in the context of EE and to compare the results of the classification of EU countries in terms of the analyzed phenomena. The study was conducted using the ELECTRE Tri method, one of the advanced techniques of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The classification procedure used made it possible to assign countries to predefined decision-making categories on the basis of preference threshold values and dominance relations to reference profiles. The 27 EU member states were analyzed on the basis of empirical data from 2023, using a set of 20 indicators characterizing EE and QoL. Countries were assigned to one of five classes, differentiating the level of development in both analyzed areas. Optimistic and pessimistic approaches were used to assess the stability of the classifications. The analysis showed the presence of countries with consistent results (e.g., Poland and Germany), extreme countries (Ireland and the Netherlands—high QoL with low EE; Romania and Croatia—inversely), as well as non-unique cases (e.g., Malta, the Czech Republic/Czechia, and Finland). The spatial approach indicated regions requiring special support. The results of the study can be a useful tool to support the process of designing public policies aimed at integrating social, economic, energy, and environmental goals within SD.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneta Becker & Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel & Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła, 2025. "Quality of Life and Energy Efficiency in Europe—A Multi-Criteria Classification of Countries and Analysis of Regional Disproportions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-37, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4768-:d:1662038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4768/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4768/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rocha, António & Costa, Ana Sara & Figueira, José Rui & Ferreira, Diogo Cunha & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2021. "Quality assessment of the Portuguese public hospitals: A multiple criteria approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Martins, H. & Henriques, C.O. & Figueira, J.R. & Silva, C.S. & Costa, A.S., 2023. "Assessing policy interventions to stimulate the transition of electric vehicle technology in the European Union," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    3. Leomara Battisti Telles & Luciano Medina Macedo & Juliana Vitória Messias Bittencourt, 2024. "ELECTRE-TRI Multicriteria Approach for Measuring Performance of Rural Co-Operatives in Southwest Paraná, Brazil," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Marta Szaja & Paweł Ziemba, 2025. "Stochastic Modelling in Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Quality of Life—The Case of the West Pomeranian Voivodeship in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-31, February.
    5. Doris Fuchs & Bernd Schlipphak & Oliver Treib & Le Anh Nguyen Long & Markus Lederer, 2020. "Which Way Forward in Measuring the Quality of Life? A Critical Analysis of Sustainability and Well-Being Indicator Sets," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(2), pages 12-36, May.
    6. Gregório, Beatriz Cagigal & Pereira, Miguel Alves & Costa, Ana Sara, 2024. "Multi-criteria decision-aiding for public hospitals: The role of interactions among pairs of access and quality criteria," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Thebault, Martin & Desthieux, Gilles & Castello, Roberto & Berrah, Lamia, 2022. "Large-scale evaluation of the suitability of buildings for photovoltaic integration: Case study in Greater Geneva," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    8. Sławomira Hajduk & Dorota Jelonek, 2021. "A Decision-Making Approach Based on TOPSIS Method for Ranking Smart Cities in the Context of Urban Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Cabeça, Ana Sofia & Henriques, Carla Oliveira & Figueira, José Rui & Silva, Carlos S., 2021. "A multicriteria classification approach for assessing the current governance capacities on energy efficiency in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    10. Neves, Lui­s Pires & Martins, António Gomes & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Dias, Lui­s Cândido, 2008. "A multi-criteria decision approach to sorting actions for promoting energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2351-2363, July.
    11. Pavel López-Parra & Pavel A. Alvarez & María Bernal & Ernesto León-Castro, 2023. "A robust ranking model for analysing marginality of regions of Mexico," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1/2), pages 104-122.
    12. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2020. "How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khannoussi, Arwa & Meyer, Patrick & Chaubet, Aurore, 2023. "A multi-criteria decision aiding approach for upgrading public sewerage systems and its application to the city of Brest," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    2. Junyi Chai & Zhiquan Weng & Wenbin Liu, 2021. "Behavioral Decision Making in Normative and Descriptive Views: A Critical Review of Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Togun, Hussein & Basem, Ali & Abdulrazzaq, Tuqa & Biswas, Nirmalendu & Abed, Azher M. & dhabab, Jameel M. & Chattopadhyay, Anirban & Slimi, Khalifa & Paul, Dipankar & Barmavatu, Praveen & Chrouda, Ama, 2025. "Development and comparative analysis between battery electric vehicles (BEV) and fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    4. Fernández, Eduardo & Figueira, José Rui & Navarro, Jorge & Solares, Efrain, 2022. "Handling imperfect information in multiple criteria decision-making through a comprehensive interval outranking approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    5. Bošković, Sara & Švadlenka, Libor & Jovčić, Stefan & Simic, Vladimir & Dobrodolac, Momčilo & Elomiya, Akram, 2024. "Sustainable propulsion technology selection in penultimate mile delivery using the FullEX-AROMAN method," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Ricardo, Alexandre & Figueira, José Rui & Tavares, Luís Valadares, 2024. "Integrating confidence and preservation of information in the preference elicitation process: A lexicographic order approach for inconsistent judgments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    8. Larry Dwyer, 2023. "Why tourism economists should treat resident well-being more seriously," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(8), pages 1975-1994, December.
    9. Ali Nemati & Mohammad Assadi Shalmani & Qiang Lu & Jake Luo, 2025. "Benchmarking Large Language Models from Open and Closed Source Models to Apply Data Annotation for Free-Text Criteria in Healthcare," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-27, March.
    10. Renata Biadacz & Marek Biadacz, 2021. "Implementation of “Smart” Solutions and An Attempt to Measure Them: A Case Study of Czestochowa, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    11. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.
    12. M. Kandakoglu & G. Walther & S. Ben Amor, 2024. "The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 807-830, January.
    13. Martínez, Ricardo & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquín & Llorca, Natividad, 2022. "Assessments in public procurement procedures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    14. Peng, Ruoqing & Tang, Justin Hayse Chiwing G. & Yang, Xiong & Meng, Meng & Zhang, Jie & Zhuge, Chengxiang, 2024. "Investigating the factors influencing the electric vehicle market share: A comparative study of the European Union and United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    15. Haider Mahmood & Muhammad Tanveer & Maham Furqan, 2021. "Rule of Law, Corruption Control, Governance, and Economic Growth in Managing Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Consumption in South Asia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Meng, Ming & Qu, Danlei, 2022. "Understanding the green energy efficiencies of provinces in China: A Super-SBM and GML analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    17. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    18. Dyckhoff, Harald & Souren, Rainer, 2022. "Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis and production theory for performance evaluation: Framework and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 795-816.
    19. Fernandez, Viviana, 2021. "Are extractive ventures more socio-environmentally committed?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Carayannis, Elias G. & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Wurth, Bernd, 2022. "OR for entrepreneurial ecosystems: A problem-oriented review and agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 791-808.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4768-:d:1662038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.