IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4356-d1653572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on New Energy Vehicle Battery (NEV) Recycling Model Considering Carbon Emission

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Li

    (School of Business, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yuan Liu

    (School of Management Science Engineering, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the carbon emission problem of new energy vehicle (NEV) battery recycling, constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model of battery manufactures, new energy vehicle original equipment manufacturers (NEV OEMs) and certified recyclers, analyzes the stability of each party’s strategy selection and the relationship between the influence of the elements, and simulates to verify the validity of the conclusions, and arrives at the conditions for the occurrence of the lowest carbon emission stabilizing strategy combinations, and puts forward countermeasure suggestions accordingly, and analyzes the effects of the changes of the key parameters on the equilibrium results, and the study shows that (1) Carbon emission cost, battery decomposition cost, recycling channel construction cost and R&D cost are the main factors affecting the equilibrium results. (2) Under the carbon emission reduction policy, the battery manufacturer’s investment in low-carbon production can help other actors in the supply chain to reduce the negative impact of the policy so that they can reduce their costs. (3) The cooperative recycling model based on the recycling network constructed by vehicle manufacturers can maximize the interests of all parties in the supply chain. The findings of the study provide management insights for governments, battery manufacturers, NEV OEMs, and certified recyclers.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Li & Yuan Liu, 2025. "Research on New Energy Vehicle Battery (NEV) Recycling Model Considering Carbon Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4356-:d:1653572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4356/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4356/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan Shen & Zizhao Song & Tian Gao & Ji Ma, 2022. "Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making of Power Battery Considering Subsidy Transfer under EPR System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    3. Fei Zeng & Zhiping Lu & Chengyu Lu, 2024. "Power Battery Recycling Model of Closed-Loop Supply Chains Considering Different Power Structures Under Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Xu, Xiaofeng & Liu, Zhiting & Liu, Wenzhi & Pei, Chuantao & Wu, Xiangfan & Nie, Zhengya, 2024. "A sustainable development benchmarking framework for energy companies based on topic mining and knowledge graph: The case of oil and gas industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Vongdala Noudeng & Nguyen Van Quan & Tran Dang Xuan, 2022. "A Future Perspective on Waste Management of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles in Lao PDR: Current Status and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Liu, Xiao & Zhou, Xiaoyong, 2025. "Determinants of carbon emissions from road transportation in China: An extended input-output framework with production-theoretical approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    7. Yue Qi & Weixin Yao & Jiagui Zhu, 2024. "Study on the Selection of Recycling Strategies for the Echelon Utilization of Electric Vehicle Batteries under the Carbon Trading Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-30, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhe Wang & Fan Wu & Wenxi Zhang & Sijia Ke & Xiaobo Wang, 2024. "Multi‐agent behavioral strategy game and synergy evolution path of the retired power battery recycling system," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 3993-4011, September.
    2. Qianru Chen & Hualin Xie & Qunli Zhai, 2022. "Management Policy of Farmers’ Cultivated Land Abandonment Behavior Based on Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Gu, Tianqi & Xu, Weiping & Liang, Hua & He, Qing & Zheng, Nan, 2024. "School bus transport service strategies’ policy-making mechanism – An evolutionary game approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Wang Mingbao & Du Zhiping & Duan Hong, 2017. "Study on Participant Behavior Game of Electronic Products Reverse Supply Chain Based on ECP," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(5), pages 411-434, October.
    6. Sun, Yong & Liu, Baoyin & Sun, Zhongrui & Yang, Ruijia, 2023. "Inter-regional cooperation in the transfers of energy-intensive industry: An evolutionary game approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    7. Jialu Li & Meiying Yang & Wei Xing & Xuan Zhao, 2018. "Information Acquisition Behavior: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 434-455, June.
    8. Hongxia Sun & Yao Wan & Huirong Lv, 2020. "System Dynamics Model for the Evolutionary Behaviour of Government Enterprises and Consumers in China’s New Energy Vehicle Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Song Yang & Jincai Zhuang & Aifeng Wang & Yancai Zhang, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Chinese Food Quality considering Effort Levels," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, November.
    10. Bergstrom, Theodore C & Stark, Oded, 1993. "How Altruism Can Prevail in an Evolutionary Environment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(2), pages 149-155, May.
    11. Yinglin Wang & Leqi Chen & Jiaxin Zhuang, 2024. "Research on ESG Investment Efficiency Regulation from the Perspective of Reciprocity and Evolutionary Game," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1665-1695, September.
    12. Hopkins, Ed, 1999. "Learning, Matching, and Aggregation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 79-110, January.
    13. Mengyang Cui & Yuhong Wang, 2025. "Research on New Energy Vehicle Power Battery Recycling Deposit System Based on Evolutionary Game Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Guohui Song & Yongbin Wang, 2021. "Mainstream Value Information Push Strategy on Chinese Aggregation News Platform: Evolution, Modelling and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Sandholm,W.H., 2003. "Excess payoff dynamics, potential dynamics, and stable games," Working papers 5, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    16. Jin, Tao & Jiang, Yulian & Liu, Xingwen, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis of the impact of dynamic dual credit policy on new energy vehicles after subsidy cancellation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    17. Viossat, Yannick, 2008. "Evolutionary dynamics may eliminate all strategies used in correlated equilibrium," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 27-43, July.
    18. Jinxiu Pi & Hui Yang & Yadong Shu & Chongyi Zhong & Guanghui Yang, 2020. "The Stability of Two-Community Replicator Dynamics with Discrete Multi-Delays," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Guanqiao Pan & Hongchao Jiang & Qianhui Jin & Tianyi Zhao & Jiajun Wang & Li Wang, 2021. "Study on the Sharing Transportation Based on Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    20. Hui Yu & Wei Wang & Baohua Yang & Cunfang Li, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Stress Effect of Cross-Regional Transfer of Resource-Exhausted Enterprises," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4356-:d:1653572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.