IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4348-d1653494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rainfall-Induced Geological Hazard Susceptibility Assessment in the Henan Section of the Yellow River Basin: Multi-Model Approaches Supporting Disaster Mitigation and Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Yinyuan Zhang

    (School of Resources and Earth Sciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Hui Ci

    (School of Resources and Earth Sciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Hui Yang

    (School of Resources and Earth Sciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Ran Wang

    (School of Resources and Earth Sciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Zhaojin Yan

    (School of Resources and Earth Sciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

The Henan section of the Yellow River Basin (3.62 × 10 4 km 2 , 21.7% of Henan Province), a vital agro-industrial and politico-economic hub, faces frequent rainfall-induced geohazards. The 2021 “7·20” Zhengzhou disaster, causing 398 fatalities and CNY 120.06 billion loss, highlights its vulnerability to extreme weather. While machine learning (ML) aids geohazard assessment, rainfall-induced geological hazard susceptibility assessment (RGHSA) remains understudied, with single ML models lacking interpretability and precision for complex disaster data. This study presents a hybrid framework (IVM-ML) that integrates the Information Value Model (IVM) and ML. The framework uses historical disaster data and 11 factors (e.g., rainfall erosivity, relief amplitude) to calculate information values and construct a machine learning prediction model with these quantitative results. By combining IVM’s spatial analysis with ML’s predictive power, it addresses the limitations of conventional single models. ROC curve validation shows the Random Forest (RF) model in IVM-ML achieves the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.9599), outperforming standalone IVM (AUC = 0.7624). All models exhibit AUC values exceeding 0.75, demonstrating strong capability in capturing rainfall–hazard relationships and reliable predictive performance. Findings support RGHSA practices in the mid-Yellow River urban cluster, offering insights for sustainable risk management, land-use planning, and climate resilience. Bridging geoscience and data-driven methods, this study advances global sustainability goals for disaster reduction and environmental security in vulnerable riverine regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinyuan Zhang & Hui Ci & Hui Yang & Ran Wang & Zhaojin Yan, 2025. "Rainfall-Induced Geological Hazard Susceptibility Assessment in the Henan Section of the Yellow River Basin: Multi-Model Approaches Supporting Disaster Mitigation and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4348-:d:1653494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sk Ajim Ali & Farhana Parvin & Quoc Bao Pham & Khaled Mohamed Khedher & Mahro Dehbozorgi & Yasin Wahid Rabby & Duong Tran Anh & Duc Hiep Nguyen, 2022. "An ensemble random forest tree with SVM, ANN, NBT, and LMT for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Rangit River watershed, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(3), pages 1601-1633, September.
    2. Taliah Sajid & Sakina Khuzema Maimoon & Muhammad Waseem & Shiraz Ahmed & Muhammad Arsalan Khan & Jens Tränckner & Ghufran Ahmed Pasha & Hossein Hamidifar & Charalampos Skoulikaris, 2025. "Integrated Risk Assessment of Floods and Landslides in Kohistan, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Sirui Luo & Xiangxue Li & Jie Yang & Xingwei Li, 2024. "How to Consider Human Footprints to Assess Human Disturbance: Evidence from Urban Agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Friedman, Jerome H., 2002. "Stochastic gradient boosting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 367-378, February.
    5. Sérgio C. Oliveira & José L. Zêzere & Ricardo A. C. Garcia & Susana Pereira & Teresa Vaz & Raquel Melo, 2024. "Landslide susceptibility assessment using different rainfall event-based landslide inventories: advantages and limitations," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(10), pages 9361-9399, August.
    6. Shuhan Shen & Longsheng Deng & Dong Tang & Jiale Chen & Ranke Fang & Peng Du & Xin Liang, 2025. "Landslide Hazard Assessment Based on Ensemble Learning Model and Bayesian Probability Statistics: Inference from Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-29, February.
    7. Narissara Nuthammachot & Dimitris Stratoulias, 2021. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for forest fire risk assessment by coupling AHP and GIS: method and case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17443-17458, December.
    8. Nitin Lohan & Sushil Kumar & Vivek Singh & Raj Pritam Gupta & Gaurav Tiwari, 2025. "Analyzing an Extreme Rainfall Event in Himachal Pradesh, India, to Contribute to Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Zhijun Wang & Chenxi Zhao, 2025. "Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Based on ReliefF Feature Weight Fusion: A Case Study of Wenxian County, Longnan City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mansoor, Umer & Jamal, Arshad & Su, Junbiao & Sze, N.N. & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Investigating the risk factors of motorcycle crash injury severity in Pakistan: Insights and policy recommendations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 21-38.
    2. Xianmin Wang & Shuwang Wu & Zixiang Zhao & Haixiang Guo & Wenxue Chen, 2025. "Optimization of emergency rescue routes after a violent earthquake," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(4), pages 4585-4613, March.
    3. Bissan Ghaddar & Ignacio Gómez-Casares & Julio González-Díaz & Brais González-Rodríguez & Beatriz Pateiro-López & Sofía Rodríguez-Ballesteros, 2023. "Learning for Spatial Branching: An Algorithm Selection Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1024-1043, September.
    4. Akash Malhotra, 2018. "A hybrid econometric-machine learning approach for relative importance analysis: Prioritizing food policy," Papers 1806.04517, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    5. Nahushananda Chakravarthy H G & Karthik M Seenappa & Sujay Raghavendra Naganna & Dayananda Pruthviraja, 2023. "Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Incinerated Bio-Medical Waste Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Tim Voigt & Martin Kohlhase & Oliver Nelles, 2021. "Incremental DoE and Modeling Methodology with Gaussian Process Regression: An Industrially Applicable Approach to Incorporate Expert Knowledge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Wen, Shaoting & Buyukada, Musa & Evrendilek, Fatih & Liu, Jingyong, 2020. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of co-combustion/pyrolysis of textile dyeing sludge and incense sticks: Regression and machine-learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 463-474.
    8. Zhu, Haibin & Bai, Lu & He, Lidan & Liu, Zhi, 2023. "Forecasting realized volatility with machine learning: Panel data perspective," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 251-271.
    9. Juan Li & Jin Zhang & Li Wang & Ao Zhao, 2024. "A Hierarchical Spatiotemporal Data Model Based on Knowledge Graphs for Representation and Modeling of Dynamic Landslide Scenes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Makridakis, Spyros & Kaltsounis, Anastasios & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Product sales probabilistic forecasting: An empirical evaluation using the M5 competition data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    11. Zhang, Ning & Li, Zhiying & Zou, Xun & Quiring, Steven M., 2019. "Comparison of three short-term load forecast models in Southern California," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Smyl, Slawek & Hua, N. Grace, 2019. "Machine learning methods for GEFCom2017 probabilistic load forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1424-1431.
    13. Zühal Özcan & İnci Caglayan & Özgür Kabak & Fatmagül Kılıç Gül, 2025. "Integrated risk mapping for forest fire management using the analytical hierarchy process and ordered weighted average: a case study in southern Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(1), pages 959-1001, January.
    14. Hongrui Wen & Qiaozhen Guo & Yuhuai Zeng & Zepeng Wu & Zhenhui Sun, 2022. "Study on forest fire risk in Conghua district of Guangzhou city based on multi-source data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 3163-3183, December.
    15. Barzin,Samira & Avner,Paolo & Maruyama Rentschler,Jun Erik & O’Clery,Neave, 2022. "Where Are All the Jobs ? A Machine Learning Approach for High Resolution Urban Employment Prediction inDeveloping Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9979, The World Bank.
    16. Eike Emrich & Christian Pierdzioch, 2016. "Volunteering, Match Quality, and Internet Use," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 136(2), pages 199-226.
    17. Kusiak, Andrew & Zheng, Haiyang & Song, Zhe, 2009. "On-line monitoring of power curves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1487-1493.
    18. Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    19. Catherine Ikae & Jacques Savoy, 2022. "Gender identification on Twitter," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(1), pages 58-69, January.
    20. Cao, Jason & Tao, Tao, 2025. "Can an identified environmental correlate of car ownership serve as a practical planning tool?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4348-:d:1653494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.