IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p52-d1553152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impactful Methodological Considerations for Knowledge Co-Creation in Sustainable Development Research

Author

Listed:
  • Marcellus Forh Mbah

    (Manchester Institute of Education, School of Environment, Education & Development, Ellen Wilkinson Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Chidi Ezegwu

    (Manchester Institute of Education, School of Environment, Education & Development, Ellen Wilkinson Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

Abstract

The extant literature is rich with references to co-creation in research and knowledge initiatives. However, there is a pressing need for clarity regarding the definition of knowledge co-creation and its application in sustainable development research. To fill these gaps, we conducted a systematic review of 42 articles that met the selection criteria. The findings revealed the disciplinarity in the studies, geographical collaboration patterns, and varying interpretations of knowledge co-creation. This study also identified key engagement methods and stages essential for the knowledge co-creation process in the context of sustainable development. The implications for practice highlight the importance for researchers, and possibly policy-makers, to consider not only the various definitions of knowledge co-creation attempted—often lacking consensus—but also guiding principles. Strengthening knowledge co-creation in transdisciplinary studies, fostering robust global partnerships, ensuring equitable regional representation, facilitating the active participation of diverse stakeholders, and maintaining balanced power dynamics rooted in trust and relationality are crucial for achieving positive sustainable development outcomes. The intersection of research, knowledge co-creation, sustainable development, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), along with the elements proposed for future consideration, which has not been extensively explored in previous studies, underscores the originality of this study, which carries significant theoretical, methodological, and global policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcellus Forh Mbah & Chidi Ezegwu, 2024. "Impactful Methodological Considerations for Knowledge Co-Creation in Sustainable Development Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:52-:d:1553152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/52/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/52/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko & Greenstein, Joshua & Stewart, David, 2013. "How Should MDG Success and Failure be Judged: Faster Progress or Achieving the Targets?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 19-30.
    2. Didde Hoeeg & Ulla Christensen & Dan Grabowski, 2019. "Co-Designing an Intervention to Prevent Overweight and Obesity among Young Children and Their Families in a Disadvantaged Municipality: Methodological Barriers and Potentials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Hisashi Murata & Kotaro Nakamura & Kunio Shirahadà, 2021. "Knowledge Co-Creation Roadmapping for Future Industrial Visions: Case Study on Smart Infrastructure," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 52-64.
    4. Tramy Ngo & Rob Hales & Gui Lohmann, 2019. "Collaborative marketing for the sustainable development of community-based tourism enterprises: a reconciliation of diverse perspectives," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(18), pages 2266-2283, November.
    5. Claire McInerney, 2002. "Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(12), pages 1009-1018, October.
    6. Alkire, Sabina, 2005. "Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199283316.
    7. Marcellus Forh Mbah & Chidi Ezegwu, 2024. "The Decolonisation of Climate Change and Environmental Education in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Tania Pearce & Myfanwy Maple & Anthony Shakeshaft & Sarah Wayland & Kathy McKay, 2020. "What is the Co-Creation of New Knowledge? A Content Analysis and Proposed Definition for Health Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Adina Dudau & Russ Glennon & Bram Verschuere, 2019. "Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(11), pages 1577-1594, November.
    10. Michael A. Chilton & James M. Bloodgood, 2008. "The Dimensions of Tacit & Explicit Knowledge: A Description and Measure," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 75-91, April.
    11. Brandt, Patric & Ernst, Anna & Gralla, Fabienne & Luederitz, Christopher & Lang, Daniel J. & Newig, Jens & Reinert, Florian & Abson, David J. & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2013. "A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1-15.
    12. Laura Kreiling & Caroline Paunov, 2021. "Knowledge co-creation in the 21st century: A cross-country experience-based policy report," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 115, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Alonzo, 2022. "Organizational Values and Knowledge Sharing in Public Institution: Economic-Public Sector in Guatemala," Digital Transformation: The Harmonic Convergence of People, Culture, Process, and Technology in the New Normal,, ToKnowPress.
    2. Antoinette Baujard & Muriel Gilardone, 2017. "Sen is not a capability theorist," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Iwona Dudek & Jean-Yves Blaise, 2017. "What Comes before a Digital Output? Eliciting and Documenting Cultural Heritage Research Processes," Post-Print halshs-01673865, HAL.
    4. Antonio J. Castro & Cristina Quintas-Soriano & Jodi Brandt & Carla L. Atkinson & Colden V. Baxter & Morey Burnham & Benis N. Egoh & Marina García-Llorente & Jason P. Julian & Berta Martín-López & Feli, 2018. "Applying Place-Based Social-Ecological Research to Address Water Scarcity: Insights for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Dang, Hai-Anh H. & Serajuddin, Umar, 2020. "Tracking the sustainable development goals: Emerging measurement challenges and further reflections," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    6. Marc Fleurbaey & Rossi Abi-Rafeh, 2016. "The Use of Distributional Weights in Benefit–Cost Analysis: Insights from Welfare Economics," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 286-307.
    7. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    8. Dimitris Tsintsaris & Milan Tsompanoglou & Evangelos Ioannidis, 2024. "Dynamics of Social Influence and Knowledge in Networks: Sociophysics Models and Applications in Social Trading, Behavioral Finance and Business," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.
    9. Md. Hashibul Hassan & Lubna Jebin, 2018. "Comparative Capability of Migrant and Non-Migrant Households: Evidence from Rural Bangladesh," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(5), pages 618-640, May.
    10. Juerges, Nataly & Jahn, Stephanie, 2020. "German forest management stakeholders at the science-society interface: Their views on problem definition, knowledge production and research utilization," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    11. Arora-Jonsson, Seema, 2016. "Does resilience have a culture? Ecocultures and the politics of knowledge production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 98-107.
    12. Margherita Scarlato, 2012. "Social Enterprise and Development Policy: Evidence from Italy," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 24-49, March.
    13. Magrini, Marie-Benoit & Anton, Marc & Cholez, Célia & Corre-Hellou, Guenaelle & Duc, Gérard & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Pelzer, Elise & Voisin, Anne-Sophie & Walrand, Stéphane, 2016. "Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-162.
    14. Knierim, Andrea & Schmid, Julia Christiane & Knuth, Ulrike, 2014. "Aktionsforschung Zur Anpassung An Den Klimawandel--Methodische Potentiale Und Herausforderungen Am Beispiel Eines Transdisziplinaren Verbundprojektes In Brandenburg Berlin," 54th Annual Conference, Goettingen, Germany, September 17-19, 2014 187298, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    15. Rafi Amir-ud-Din & Faisal Abbas & Sajid Amin Javed, 2018. "Poverty as Functioning Deprivation: Global Estimates," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 1077-1108, December.
    16. William Joe & Udaya Shankar Mishra, 2015. "On Reckoning Level Differentials in the Measurement of Progress: An Illustration in the Context of Deliveries Assisted by Skilled Health Personnel," IEG Working Papers 352, Institute of Economic Growth.
    17. Josep Lloret & Rafael Abós-Herràndiz & Sílvia Alemany & Rosario Allué & Joan Bartra & Maria Basagaña & Elisa Berdalet & Mònica Campàs & Arnau Carreño & Montserrat Demestre & Jorge Diogène & Eva Fontde, 2020. "The Roses Ocean and Human Health Chair: A New Way to Engage the Public in Oceans and Human Health Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Yongliang Chen & Zhongzhi Qin & Li Sun & Jiantao Wu & Wen Ai & Jiayuan Chao & Huaixin Li & Jiangnan Li, 2025. "GDT Framework: Integrating Generative Design and Design Thinking for Sustainable Development in the AI Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, January.
    19. Ghabban, Fahad & Selamat, Ali & Ibrahim, Roliana, 2018. "New model for encouraging academic staff in Saudi universities to use IT for knowledge sharing to improve scholarly publication performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 92-99.
    20. Engler, John-Oliver & Kretschmer, Max-Friedemann & Rathgens, Julius & Ament, Joe A. & Huth, Thomas & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2024. "15 years of degrowth research: A systematic review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:52-:d:1553152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.