IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3714-d1385463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Management for Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • John Ikerd

    (Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to address a fundamental flaw in prominent approaches to managing businesses for sustainability. Current management strategies fail to recognize the fundamental differences between economic, social, and moral or ethical values. Economic values are instrumental, individual, and impersonal. Social values are reciprocal, communal, and personal. Moral values are altruistic, spiritual, and universal. These are not arbitrary definitions but expressions of basic differences among the three types of value. These differences reveal the fundamental flaws in attempts to assign economic value or objectively quantify the social and ecological costs and benefits of economic enterprises. The transactional, social, and moral economies are defined in ways that avoid compromising the differences in values. In addition, a natural hierarchy exists among nature, society, and economy that requires a corresponding hierarchy of moral, social, and economic values in managing sustainable organizations. The strategies, motives, and metrics that have dominated sustainable business management for the past several decades, and the related research and educational programs that support them, fail to reflect differences among economic, social, and moral values that are critical to sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • John Ikerd, 2024. "Business Management for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3714-:d:1385463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Ackerman & Kevin Gallagher, "undated". "Getting the Prices Wrong: The Limits of Market-Based Environmental Policy," GDAE Working Papers 00-05, GDAE, Tufts University.
    2. Benedict Sheehy, 2015. "Defining CSR: Problems and Solutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 625-648, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magdalena Kowalska & Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka, 2025. "Sustainable Development Through the Lens of Climate Change: A Diagnosis of Attitudes in Southeastern Rural Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Fabio Zagonari, 2025. "Ethicametrics: A New Interdisciplinary Science," Stats, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Bartosz Błaszczak & Szymon Godawa & Izabella Kęsy, 2025. "Human Safety in Light of the Economic, Social and Environmental Aspects of Sustainable Development—Determination of the Awareness of the Young Generation in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Ben Robra & Alex Pazaitis & Arnaud Levy, 2025. "“A Sane Island in an Ocean of Madness”: A Case of Alternative Organisational Ethics Through Post-Growth Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(2), pages 233-253, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nur Faliza, 2016. "CSR and Islamic Banking Performance in Aceh: The Role of Innovation as Mediation ," GATR Journals jmmr116, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    2. Frank Ackerman & Kevin Gallagher, "undated". "Mixed Signals: Market Incentives, Recycling, and the Price Spike of 1995," GDAE Working Papers 01-02, GDAE, Tufts University.
    3. C. B. Bhattacharya & Sankar Sen & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Michael Neureiter, 2023. "Corporate Purpose and Employee Sustainability Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 963-981, April.
    4. Khan, Majid & Lockhart, James & Bathurst, Ralph, 2021. "The institutional analysis of CSR: Learnings from an emerging country," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    5. Percy Marquina & Vincent Charles, 2021. "A Bayesian resampling approach to estimate the difference in effect sizes in consumer social responses to CSR initiatives versus corporate abilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1680-1699, November.
    6. Suarez, Ronny, 2020. "Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly," MPRA Paper 99164, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Seong Ho Lee, 2021. "Effects of Retailers’ Corporate Social Responsibility on Retailer Equity and Consumer Usage Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-9, March.
    8. Ranjan DasGupta & Arup Roy, 2025. "Performance shortfall condition and environmental, social, governance performance: Does economic policy uncertainty and national culture matter?," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 81-132, March.
    9. Frank Ackerman, 2001. "Still dead after all these years: interpreting the failure of general equilibrium theory," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 119-139.
    10. Chuqing Dong & Qiongyao Huang & Shijun Ni & Bohan Zhang & Cang Chen, 2024. "Constructing Care-Based Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Fortune 500 Companies in China and the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(4), pages 775-802, July.
    11. Federica Balluchi & Barbara Borgato & katia Corsi & Marta Fundoni, 2024. "L?integrazione degli obiettivi di sostenibilit? nei processi di pianificazione strategica: analisi empirica nel contesto italiano," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(2), pages 65-88.
    12. Tao, Hu & Zhuang, Shan & Xue, Rui & Cao, Wei & Tian, Jinfang & Shan, Yuli, 2022. "Environmental Finance: An Interdisciplinary Review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová & Robert Kenyon MacGregor & Martin Èernek, 2021. "New trends in codes of ethics: Czech business ethics preferences by the dawn of COVID-19," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 973-1009, December.
    14. Tzu-Chiao Hung & Chieh-Yu Lin, 2022. "Key Sustainable Factors of the Pawnbroking Industry: An Empirical Study in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, October.
    15. Junli Wang & Wendong Lv, 2023. "Research on the Impact of Green Innovation Network Embeddedness on Corporate Environmental Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-28, February.
    16. Kuldeep Singh & Madhvendra Misra & Jitendra Yadav, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and financial inclusion: Evaluating the moderating effect of income," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(5), pages 1263-1274, July.
    17. Mario La Torre & Sabrina Leo & Ida Claudia Panetta, 2021. "Banks and environmental, social and governance drivers: Follow the market or the authorities?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1620-1634, November.
    18. Md. Rezaul Karim & Samia Afrin Shetu & Istiaque Ahmed, 2025. "Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities during the COVID-19 period: evidence from an emerging economy," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-29, January.
    19. Peiró-Signes, Ángel & Segarra-Oña, Marival & Trull-Domínguez, Óscar & Sánchez-Planelles, Joaquín, 2022. "Exposing the ideal combination of endogenous–exogenous drivers for companies’ ecoinnovative orientation: Results from machine-learning methods," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Victoria-Sophie Osburg & Iain Davies & Vignesh Yoganathan & Fraser McLeay, 2021. "Perspectives, Opportunities and Tensions in Ethical and Sustainable Luxury: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 201-210, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3714-:d:1385463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.