IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v8y2025i3p50-d1684726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethicametrics: A New Interdisciplinary Science

Author

Listed:
  • Fabio Zagonari

    (Dipartimento di Scienze per la Qualità della Vita, Università di Bologna, C.so d’Augusto 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy)

Abstract

This paper characterises Ethicametrics (EM) as a new interdisciplinary scientific research area focusing on metrics of ethics (MOE) and ethics of metrics (EOM), by providing a comprehensive methodological framework. EM is scientific: it is based on behavioural mathematical modelling to be statistically validated and tested, with additional sensitivity analyses to favour immediate interpretations. EM is interdisciplinary: it spans from less to more traditional fields, with essential mutual improvements. EM is new: valid and invalid examples of EM (articles referring to an explicit and an implicit behavioural model, respectively) are scarce, recent, time-stable and discipline-focused, with 1 and 37 scientists, respectively. Thus, the core of EM (multi-level statistical analyses applied to behavioural mathematical models) is crucial to avoid biased MOE and EOM. Conversely, articles inside EM should study quantitatively any metrics or ethics, in any alternative context, at any analytical level, by using panel/longitudinal data. Behavioural models should be ethically explicit , possibly by evaluating ethics in terms of the consequences of actions. Ethical measures should be scientifically grounded by evaluating metrics in terms of ethical criteria coming from the relevant theological/philosophical literature. Note that behavioural models applied to science metrics can be used to deduce social consequences to be ethically evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabio Zagonari, 2025. "Ethicametrics: A New Interdisciplinary Science," Stats, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:50-:d:1684726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/3/50/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/3/50/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gazi Islam & Michelle Greenwood, 2022. "The Metrics of Ethics and the Ethics of Metrics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 1-5, January.
    2. Fabio Zagonari, 2020. "Environmental sustainability is not worth pursuing unless it is achieved for ethical reasons," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Kellin Chandler Stanfield, 2023. "Evolutionary Behavioral Economics: Veblenian Institutionalist Insights from Recent Evidence," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(3), pages 693-710, July.
    4. Altman, Morris, 2020. "A more scientific approach to applied economics: Reconstructing statistical, analytical significance, and correlation analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 315-324.
    5. John Ikerd, 2024. "Business Management for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Vladimir Avtonomov & Yuri Avtonomov, 2019. "Four Methodenstreits between behavioral and mainstream economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 179-194, July.
    7. Siddharth Sareen & Andrea Saltelli & Kjetil Rommetveit, 2020. "Ethics of quantification: illumination, obfuscation and performative legitimation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-5, December.
    8. Fabio Zagonari, 2020. "Comparing Religious Environmental Ethics to Support Efforts to Achieve Local and Global Sustainability: Empirical Insights Based on a Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-36, March.
    9. Antonis Ragkousis, 2024. "Amartya Sen as a Neoclassical Economist," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(1), pages 24-58, January.
    10. Fabio Zagonari, 2024. "Sustainable business models and conflict indices for sustainable decision‐making: An application to decommissioning versus reusing offshore gas platforms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 180-196, February.
    11. Anton Oleinik, 2022. "Content Analysis as a Method for Heterodox Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1), pages 259-280, January.
    12. Fabio Zagonari & Paolo Foschi, 2024. "Coping with the Inequity and Inefficiency of the H-Index: A Cross-Disciplinary Empirical Analysis," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, April.
    13. Andrea Saltelli & Monica Fiore, 2020. "From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    14. Fabio Zagonari, 2021. "Foreign direct investment vs. cross-border trade in environmental services with ethical spillovers: a theoretical model based on panel data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 130-154, April.
    15. Reinhard Neck, 2021. "Methodological Individualism: Still a Useful Methodology for the Social Sciences?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 49(4), pages 349-361, December.
    16. Fabio Zagonari, 2023. "Pope Francis vs. Patriarch Bartholomew to Achieve Global Environmental Sustainability: Theoretical Insights Supported by Empirical Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Kuc-Czarnecka & Magdalena Olczyk, 2020. "How ethics combine with big data: a bibliometric analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Fabio Zagonari, 2023. "Pope Francis vs. Patriarch Bartholomew to Achieve Global Environmental Sustainability: Theoretical Insights Supported by Empirical Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Etxano, Iker & Villalba-Eguiluz, Unai, 2021. "Twenty-five years of social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) in the search for sustainability: Analysis of case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Magdalena Kowalska & Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka, 2025. "Sustainable Development Through the Lens of Climate Change: A Diagnosis of Attitudes in Southeastern Rural Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Shinichi Nakagawa & Edward R. Ivimey-Cook & Matthew J. Grainger & Rose E. O’Dea & Samantha Burke & Szymon M. Drobniak & Elliot Gould & Erin L. Macartney & April Robin Martinig & Kyle Morrison & Matthi, 2023. "Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) promotes more granularity and accountability for author contributions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-5, December.
    6. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Bartosz Błaszczak & Szymon Godawa & Izabella Kęsy, 2025. "Human Safety in Light of the Economic, Social and Environmental Aspects of Sustainable Development—Determination of the Awareness of the Young Generation in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Ben Robra & Alex Pazaitis & Arnaud Levy, 2025. "“A Sane Island in an Ocean of Madness”: A Case of Alternative Organisational Ethics Through Post-Growth Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(2), pages 233-253, August.
    8. Li, Weibo, 2024. "Quantification as social technology: Integrating studies of quantification with philosophy of technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Andrea Saltelli & Monica Fiore, 2020. "From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Siddharth Sareen, 2020. "Social and technical differentiation in smart meter rollout: embedded scalar biases in automating Norwegian and Portuguese energy infrastructure," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Samuele Lo Piano, 2020. "Ethical principles in machine learning and artificial intelligence: cases from the field and possible ways forward," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, December.
    12. Jill Walker Rettberg, 2020. "Situated data analysis: a new method for analysing encoded power relationships in social media platforms and apps," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Fabio Zagonari, 2020. "Environmental sustainability is not worth pursuing unless it is achieved for ethical reasons," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, December.
    14. Bakeev, M., 2022. "A compromise between formalism and realism as a way to influence economic policy," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 57(5), pages 113-125.
    15. Gabrielle Samuel & Federica Lucivero & Lucas Somavilla, 2022. "The Environmental Sustainability of Digital Technologies: Stakeholder Practices and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Marta Kuc-Czarnecka & Samuele Lo Piano & Andrea Saltelli, 2020. "Quantitative Storytelling in the Making of a Composite Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 775-802, June.
    17. Jean-Baptiste Fleury & Alain Marciano, 2022. "Methodological Individualism and the Foundations of the "Law and Economics" movement," Post-Print hal-03820441, HAL.
    18. Maude Lavanchy & Patrick Reichert & Jayanth Narayanan & Krishna Savani, 2023. "Applicants’ Fairness Perceptions of Algorithm-Driven Hiring Procedures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 125-150, November.
    19. Francesco Bogliacino & Rafael Charris & Camilo Gómez & Felipe Montealegre & Cristiano Codagnone, 2021. "Expert endorsement and the legitimacy of public policy. Evidence from Covid19 mitigation strategies," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3-4), pages 394-415, April.
    20. Joanna Sleigh & Shannon Hubbs & Alessandro Blasimme & Effy Vayena, 2024. "Can digital tools foster ethical deliberation?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:50-:d:1684726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.