IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2983-d1369512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Safety Assessment and Convergence of Resource-Based Cities in the Yellow River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Changju Liu

    (College of Economics and Finance, Xi’an International Studies University, Xi’an 710128, China
    College of Security Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Yulin Yellow River Basin Coal Fire Disaster Prevention and Green Development Laboratory, Yulin 719000, China
    Mine Emergency Rescue Innovation Team, The Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Xiaowei Zhai

    (College of Security Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Yulin Yellow River Basin Coal Fire Disaster Prevention and Green Development Laboratory, Yulin 719000, China
    Mine Emergency Rescue Innovation Team, The Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Keyu Ai

    (College of Security Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Yulin Yellow River Basin Coal Fire Disaster Prevention and Green Development Laboratory, Yulin 719000, China
    Mine Emergency Rescue Innovation Team, The Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

Promoting the sustainable development of resource-based cities is of great significance for the ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin. In order to solve the dilemma of the sustainable development of resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin, this paper constructs an ecological security evaluation system. It calculates the ecological security level of 30 resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin from 2006 to 2020 using the TOPSIS model and carries out a classification convergence analysis. The DID empirical test of ecological security factors by sustainable development planning policies is used to distinguish the development characteristics of different resource-based cities. The results show that (1) the ecological security level of resource cities in the Yellow River Basin is generally well developed, and there are differences between different types of resource cities; (2) the resource cities in the Yellow River Basin mainly rely on industrial transformation to improve the ecological security level; and (3) the local governments pay limited attention to environmental protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Changju Liu & Xiaowei Zhai & Keyu Ai, 2024. "Ecological Safety Assessment and Convergence of Resource-Based Cities in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2983-:d:1369512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2983/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2983/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxim, Laura & Spangenberg, Joachim H. & O'Connor, Martin, 2009. "An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 12-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wesselink, Anna & Paavola, Jouni, 2008. "WP1: Analysing multilevel water and biodiversity governance in their context. Report," UFZ Discussion Papers 5/2008, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    2. Lhermie, Guillaume & Wernli, Didier & Jørgensen, Peter Søgaard & Kenkel, Donald & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia & Tauer, Loren William & Gröhn, Yrjo Tapio, 2019. "Tradeoffs between resistance to antimicrobials in public health and their use in agriculture: Moving towards sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Maxim, Laura & Spangenberg, Joachim H., 2009. "Driving forces of chemical risks for the European biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 43-54, November.
    4. Cordier, Mateo & Pérez Agúndez, José A. & O'Connor, Martin & Rochette, Sébastien & Hecq, Walter, 2011. "Quantification of interdependencies between economic systems and ecosystem services: An input-output model applied to the Seine estuary," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1660-1671, July.
    5. Wenyan Pan & Muhammad Awais Gulzar & Waseem Hassan, 2020. "Synthetic Evaluation of China’s Regional Low-Carbon Economy Challenges by Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Rodríguez-Labajos, Beatriz & Binimelis, Rosa & Monterroso, Iliana, 2009. "Multi-level driving forces of biological invasions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 63-75, November.
    7. Ziao Yu & Tianjiao Guo & Xiaoqian Song & Lifan Zhang & Linmei Cai & Xi Zhang & Aiwen Zhao, 2024. "Green Transition Assessment, Spatial Correlation, and Obstacles Identification: Evidence from Urban Governance Data of 288 Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Corrado Battisti & Marisa Perchinelli & Sharon Vanadia & Pietro Giovacchini & Letizia Marsili, 2023. "Monitoring Effectiveness of an Operational Project on Two Threatened Landbirds: Applying a Before–After Threat Analysis and Threat Reduction Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Anne Gobin & Le Thi Thu Hien & Le Trinh Hai & Pham Ha Linh & Nguyen Ngoc Thang & Pham Quang Vinh, 2020. "Adaptation to Land Degradation in Southeast Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Bell, Simon, 2012. "DPSIR=A Problem Structuring Method? An exploration from the “Imagine” approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 350-360.
    11. Susan Baker & Michael W. Bruford & Sara MacBride-Stewart & Alice Essam & Poppy Nicol & Angelina Sanderson Bellamy, 2022. "COVID-19: Understanding Novel Pathogens in Coupled Social–Ecological Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Cheng He & Liguo Zhou & Weichun Ma & Yuan Wang, 2019. "Spatial Assessment of Urban Climate Change Vulnerability during Different Urbanization Phases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Xian Yang Zeng & Wong Ming Wong, 2014. "Decoupling Of Environmental Pressures From Economic Activities: Evidence From Taiwan," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(4), pages 41-50.
    14. Zhe Cheng & Anni Tang & Jianming Cai & Tao Song, 2022. "Exploring the High-Quality County-Level Development and Governance Response for Farming–Pastoral Ecotone in China: A Case Study of Kulun," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Yee, Susan Harrell & Carriger, John F. & Bradley, Patricia & Fisher, William S. & Dyson, Brian, 2015. "Developing scientific information to support decisions for sustainable coral reef ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 39-50.
    16. Gregory, Amanda J. & Atkins, Jonathan P. & Burdon, Daryl & Elliott, Michael, 2013. "A problem structuring method for ecosystem-based management: The DPSIR modelling process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 558-569.
    17. Davide Longato & Giulia Lucertini & Michele Dalla Fontana & Francesco Musco, 2019. "Including Urban Metabolism Principles in Decision-Making: A Methodology for Planning Waste and Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Hansson, Sven Ove & Edvardsson Björnberg, Karin & Vredin Johansson, Maria, 2011. "Making Climate Policy Efficient Implementing a Model for Environmental Policy Efficiency," Working Papers 125, National Institute of Economic Research.
    19. Guillaume Lhermie, 2021. "Shaping Agricultural Policies in the Anthropocene Era: What Can We Learn from the DPSIR Framework?," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(25), October.
    20. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2983-:d:1369512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.