IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p464-d1066279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Effectiveness of an Operational Project on Two Threatened Landbirds: Applying a Before–After Threat Analysis and Threat Reduction Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Corrado Battisti

    (‘Torre Flavia’ LTER (Long Term Ecological Research) Station, Protected Areas—Regional Park Service, Città Metropolitana di Roma Capitale, Viale G. Ribotta, 41, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Marisa Perchinelli

    (‘Torre Flavia’ LTER (Long Term Ecological Research) Station, Protected Areas—Regional Park Service, Città Metropolitana di Roma Capitale, Viale G. Ribotta, 41, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Sharon Vanadia

    (‘Torre Flavia’ LTER (Long Term Ecological Research) Station, Protected Areas—Regional Park Service, Città Metropolitana di Roma Capitale, Viale G. Ribotta, 41, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Pietro Giovacchini

    (Department of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, Via Mattioli, 4, 53100 Siena, Italy)

  • Letizia Marsili

    (Department of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, Via Mattioli, 4, 53100 Siena, Italy)

Abstract

Human activities are at the origin of anthropogenic threats altering ecosystems at any hierarchical level. To mitigate them, environmental managers develop projects to obtain effective outcomes on biological targets of conservation concern. Here, we carried out two new approaches (TAN = Threat Analysis and TRA = Threat Reduction Assessment) aimed at assessing the effectiveness of conservation actions on two threatened beach-nesting landbird species, the Kentish Plover ( Charadrius alexandrinus ) and the Little Ringed Plover ( C. dubius ), breeding along a coastal beach of central Italy. Using a score-based evaluation (TAN approach), a panel of experts assessed the extent, intensity, and magnitude of a set of species-specific threats, ranking them from more to less impacting. Domestic dogs, dune trampling, and synanthropic predators appeared as the threats with the most significant magnitudes. Using the TRA approach, experts obtained a rank of threats that were more urgent to solve: i.e., domestic dogs and dune trampling. To contrast with these threats, in 2021, we carried out a conservation project with specific measures that were aimed at reducing the threat magnitude on birds. They included: dune borders demarcation, anti-predatory cages on plover nests, the removal of beach-stranded fishing lines and hooks, field surveillance by volunteers, dog control, social- and mass-media communication, and alliances with stakeholders and institutions. After the project, mechanical beach grooming (>80%), dune trampling, and synanthropic predators (both >60%) showed the highest percentage of impact reduction. The project showed a medium–high level of effectiveness in reducing the total threat magnitude (TRA-I index = 63.08%). The Threat Analysis should be routinely used to arrange a causal chain that is useful for defining the relationships among human-induced threats and ecological targets, selecting the threats with the highest magnitudes. After the projects, the Threat Reduction Assessment may assess the level of threat reduction, suggesting measures for adaptive management.

Suggested Citation

  • Corrado Battisti & Marisa Perchinelli & Sharon Vanadia & Pietro Giovacchini & Letizia Marsili, 2023. "Monitoring Effectiveness of an Operational Project on Two Threatened Landbirds: Applying a Before–After Threat Analysis and Threat Reduction Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:464-:d:1066279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/464/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/464/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxim, Laura & Spangenberg, Joachim H. & O'Connor, Martin, 2009. "An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 12-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Ferrarini & Marco Gustin & Claudio Celada, 2024. "Waterbirds of Sardinia (Italy): How Space and Time Shape a Threatened Metacommunity During the Critical Summer Period," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wesselink, Anna & Paavola, Jouni, 2008. "WP1: Analysing multilevel water and biodiversity governance in their context. Report," UFZ Discussion Papers 5/2008, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    2. Lhermie, Guillaume & Wernli, Didier & Jørgensen, Peter Søgaard & Kenkel, Donald & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia & Tauer, Loren William & Gröhn, Yrjo Tapio, 2019. "Tradeoffs between resistance to antimicrobials in public health and their use in agriculture: Moving towards sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Maxim, Laura & Spangenberg, Joachim H., 2009. "Driving forces of chemical risks for the European biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 43-54, November.
    4. Cordier, Mateo & Pérez Agúndez, José A. & O'Connor, Martin & Rochette, Sébastien & Hecq, Walter, 2011. "Quantification of interdependencies between economic systems and ecosystem services: An input-output model applied to the Seine estuary," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1660-1671, July.
    5. Wenyan Pan & Muhammad Awais Gulzar & Waseem Hassan, 2020. "Synthetic Evaluation of China’s Regional Low-Carbon Economy Challenges by Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Rodríguez-Labajos, Beatriz & Binimelis, Rosa & Monterroso, Iliana, 2009. "Multi-level driving forces of biological invasions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 63-75, November.
    7. Ziao Yu & Tianjiao Guo & Xiaoqian Song & Lifan Zhang & Linmei Cai & Xi Zhang & Aiwen Zhao, 2024. "Green Transition Assessment, Spatial Correlation, and Obstacles Identification: Evidence from Urban Governance Data of 288 Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Anne Gobin & Le Thi Thu Hien & Le Trinh Hai & Pham Ha Linh & Nguyen Ngoc Thang & Pham Quang Vinh, 2020. "Adaptation to Land Degradation in Southeast Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Bell, Simon, 2012. "DPSIR=A Problem Structuring Method? An exploration from the “Imagine” approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 350-360.
    10. Susan Baker & Michael W. Bruford & Sara MacBride-Stewart & Alice Essam & Poppy Nicol & Angelina Sanderson Bellamy, 2022. "COVID-19: Understanding Novel Pathogens in Coupled Social–Ecological Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Shiyu Tang & Hao Yang & Yu Li, 2024. "Environmental Assessment and Restoration of the Hunjiang River Basin Based on the DPSIR Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Cheng He & Liguo Zhou & Weichun Ma & Yuan Wang, 2019. "Spatial Assessment of Urban Climate Change Vulnerability during Different Urbanization Phases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Xian Yang Zeng & Wong Ming Wong, 2014. "Decoupling Of Environmental Pressures From Economic Activities: Evidence From Taiwan," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(4), pages 41-50.
    14. Zhe Cheng & Anni Tang & Jianming Cai & Tao Song, 2022. "Exploring the High-Quality County-Level Development and Governance Response for Farming–Pastoral Ecotone in China: A Case Study of Kulun," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Yee, Susan Harrell & Carriger, John F. & Bradley, Patricia & Fisher, William S. & Dyson, Brian, 2015. "Developing scientific information to support decisions for sustainable coral reef ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 39-50.
    16. Changju Liu & Xiaowei Zhai & Keyu Ai, 2024. "Ecological Safety Assessment and Convergence of Resource-Based Cities in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Gregory, Amanda J. & Atkins, Jonathan P. & Burdon, Daryl & Elliott, Michael, 2013. "A problem structuring method for ecosystem-based management: The DPSIR modelling process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 558-569.
    18. Davide Longato & Giulia Lucertini & Michele Dalla Fontana & Francesco Musco, 2019. "Including Urban Metabolism Principles in Decision-Making: A Methodology for Planning Waste and Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Hansson, Sven Ove & Edvardsson Björnberg, Karin & Vredin Johansson, Maria, 2011. "Making Climate Policy Efficient Implementing a Model for Environmental Policy Efficiency," Working Papers 125, National Institute of Economic Research.
    20. Guillaume Lhermie, 2021. "Shaping Agricultural Policies in the Anthropocene Era: What Can We Learn from the DPSIR Framework?," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(25), October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:464-:d:1066279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.