IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2773-d1364996.html

Disruptive Passenger Behavior Impact on Overall Service Experience: An Appraisal Theory Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • RiHyun Shin

    (School of Business, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang-si 10540, Republic of Korea)

  • Jin-Woo Park

    (School of Business, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang-si 10540, Republic of Korea)

  • DongRyeol Choi

    (School of Business, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang-si 10540, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the impact of bystander appraisal components, specifically congruence and relevance, on the intention to share negative experiences resulting from disruptive passengers on a flight. The investigation focuses on the mediating factors of negative emotions, satisfaction with service recovery, and trust in the airline. Employing a scenario-based approach, the detailed perceptions of passengers who may not have directly encountered disruptive behavior were explored. A total of 368 questionnaires were collected, and a structural equation model (SEM) was utilized to assess the relationship between bystanders’ appraisal and their intention to share. The results revealed that relevance positively correlated with negative emotions, and congruence significantly affected negative emotions. Moreover, negative emotions had a negative impact on both satisfaction with service recovery (SSR) and airline trust. Both SSR and airline trust, influenced by negative emotions, were found to negatively affect the intention to share. The results will help inform strategies to manage and mitigate in-flight disturbances, so that a high-quality cabin service can be maintained and the overall airline reputation does not suffer.

Suggested Citation

  • RiHyun Shin & Jin-Woo Park & DongRyeol Choi, 2024. "Disruptive Passenger Behavior Impact on Overall Service Experience: An Appraisal Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2773-:d:1364996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2773/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2773/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard J. Jansen & Mimi Zhang & Kate Sobel & Abdur Chowdury, 2009. "Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(11), pages 2169-2188, November.
    2. Jennifer J. Argo & Katherine White & Darren W. Dahl, 2006. "Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 99-108, June.
    3. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    4. Carolyn Bonifield & Catherine Cole, 2007. "Affective responses to service failure: Anger, regret, and retaliatory versus conciliatory responses," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 85-99, June.
    5. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Patterson, Paul G. & Smith, Amy K. & Brady, Michael K., 2009. "Customer Rage Episodes: Emotions, Expressions and Behaviors," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 222-237.
    6. Harris, Lloyd C. & Ogbonna, Emmanuel, 2009. "Service sabotage: The dark side of service dynamics," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 325-335, July.
    7. Kalamas, Maria & Laroche, Michel & Makdessian, Lucy, 2008. "Reaching the boiling point: Consumers' negative affective reactions to firm-attributed service failures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 813-824, August.
    8. Leontitsis, Alexandros & Pagge, Jenny, 2007. "A simulation approach on Cronbach's alpha statistical significance," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 73(5), pages 336-340.
    9. Zourrig, Haithem & Chebat, Jean-Charles & Toffoli, Roy, 2009. "Consumer revenge behavior: A cross-cultural perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 995-1001, October.
    10. Katherine Di-Anna Bell, 2022. "An evaluation into the causes of perpetual disruptive passenger behavior," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Richins, Marsha L, 1997. "Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(2), pages 127-146, September.
    12. Sparks, Beverley A. & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2001. "Justice strategy options for increased customer satisfaction in a services recovery setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 209-218, December.
    13. Katherine Dianna Bell, 2022. "Correction to: An evaluation into the causes of perpetual disruptive passenger behavior," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 299-299, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharifi, Seyed Shahin & Aghazadeh, Hashem, 2016. "Discount reference moderates customers' reactions to discount frames after online service failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4074-4080.
    2. Haj-Salem, Narjes & Chebat, Jean-Charles, 2014. "The double-edged sword: The positive and negative effects of switching costs on customer exit and revenge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1106-1113.
    3. Demoulin, Nathalie & Willems, Kim, 2019. "Servicescape irritants and customer satisfaction: The moderating role of shopping motives and involvement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 295-306.
    4. Nguyen Ngoc Hien & Nguyen Thanh Long & Vo Tan Liem & Danh Xuan Luu, 2024. "Customer Responses to Airline Service Failure: Perspectives from Expectation Disconfirmation Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    5. Joireman, Jeff & Grégoire, Yany & Devezer, Berna & Tripp, Thomas M., 2013. "When do customers offer firms a “second chance” following a double deviation? The impact of inferred firm motives on customer revenge and reconciliation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 315-337.
    6. Yang, Chaofan & Sun, Yongqiang & Shen, Xiao-Liang, 2022. "Beyond anger: A neutralization perspective of customer revenge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 363-374.
    7. Lages, Cristiana R. & Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Kadić-Maglajlić, Selma & Borghei-Razavi, Niloofar, 2023. "A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of the dark side of customer behavior: An integrative customer incivility framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Haase, Janina & Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter & Labenz, Franziska, 2022. "Brand hate, rage, anger & co.: Exploring the relevance and characteristics of negative consumer emotions toward brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-16.
    9. Zhou, Yuanyuan & Tsang, Alex S.L. & Huang, Minxue & Zhou, Nan, 2014. "Does delaying service-failure resolution ever make sense?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 159-166.
    10. Seong Hun Kim & Yae Rim Yang, 2025. "The Effect of Digital Quality on Customer Satisfaction and Brand Loyalty Under Environmental Uncertainty: Evidence from the Banking Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-44, April.
    11. Chen, Ke & Chen, Jianxun & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush, 2020. "When in Rome! Complaint contagion effect in multi-actor service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 628-641.
    12. Snyder, Hannah & Witell, Lars & Gustafsson, Anders & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2022. "Consumer lying behavior in service encounters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 755-769.
    13. White, Allyn & Breazeale, Michael & Collier, Joel E., 2012. "The Effects of Perceived Fairness on Customer Responses to Retailer SST Push Policies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 250-261.
    14. Surachartkumtonkun, Jiraporn & Patterson, Paul G. & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2013. "Customer Rage Back-Story: Linking Needs-Based Cognitive Appraisal to Service Failure Type," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 72-87.
    15. Weitzl, Wolfgang J. & Einwiller, Sabine A., 2020. "Profiling (un-)committed online complainants: Their characteristics and post-webcare reactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 740-753.
    16. Tuzovic, Sven & Simpson, Merlin C. & Kuppelwieser, Volker G. & Finsterwalder, Jörg, 2014. "From ‘free’ to fee: Acceptability of airline ancillary fees and the effects on customer behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 98-107.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:txmdy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Mouillot, Philippe & Pupion, Pierre-Charles, 2017. "Ecosystem-based Artefacts as a Source of Loyalty at the French Valley of the Monkeys," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 106-118.
    19. Wu, Chih-Wen, 2015. "Facebook users' intentions in risk communication and food-safety issues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2242-2247.
    20. Arora, Swapan Deep & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2021. "Intellectual structure of consumer complaining behavior (CCB) research: A bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 60-74.
    21. Fanny Reniou & Aurélien Rouquet & Dilip Subramanian & Jean-Baptiste Suquet, 2017. "Réclamations « déviantes » des clients : quelles réponses pour les organisations ?," Post-Print hal-01630914, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2773-:d:1364996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.