IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2650-d1362688.html

Benefit Sharing Governance Framework: Pathways for Financial Benefit Sharing in Traditional Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Angelo de Sousa Santarlacci

    (Department of Forest Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

  • Humberto Angelo

    (Department of Forest Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

  • Álvaro Nogueira de Souza

    (Department of Forest Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

  • Maria de Fátima de Brito Lima

    (Department of Forest Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

  • Maísa Santos Joaquim

    (Department of Forest Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

  • Eder Pereira Miguel

    (Department of Forest Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

  • Júlia de Oliveira Carneiro

    (Department of Forest Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

Abstract

This article proposes the creation of a participatory governance framework for traditional communities, focusing on financial benefits sharing, whether they come from compensation, indemnification, or socio-environmental projects. The proposed governance framework was developed based on a series of governance principles and the perceptions and needs of fourteen traditional communities in the Brazilian Amazon. The results demonstrated that applied experiences were successful. In this way, the proposed framework presents itself as a mechanism that can be adapted to the specifics of managing financial resources in community contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelo de Sousa Santarlacci & Humberto Angelo & Álvaro Nogueira de Souza & Maria de Fátima de Brito Lima & Maísa Santos Joaquim & Eder Pereira Miguel & Júlia de Oliveira Carneiro, 2024. "Benefit Sharing Governance Framework: Pathways for Financial Benefit Sharing in Traditional Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2650-:d:1362688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2650/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2650/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agrawal, Arun & Gibson, Clark C., 1999. "Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 629-649, April.
    2. Lin, Lili, 2019. "Corporate Governance and Liquidity Risk of Starbucks Company," MPRA Paper 97230, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Nov 2019.
    3. Pretty, Jules & Ward, Hugh, 2001. "Social Capital and the Environment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 209-227, February.
    4. Dunlop, Tessa & Corbera, Esteve, 2016. "Incentivizing REDD+: How developing countries are laying the groundwork for benefit-sharing," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 44-54.
    5. Ferreira, Daniel & Li, Jin & Nikolowa, Radoslawa, 2019. "Corporate Capture of Blockchain Governance," CEPR Discussion Papers 13493, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Diji Chandrasekharan Behr & Eileen Mairena Cunningham & George Kajembe & Gimbage Mbeyale & Steve Nsita & Kenneth L. Rosenbaum, 2012. "Benefit Sharing in Practice : Insights for REDD+ Initiatives," World Bank Publications - Reports 12619, The World Bank Group.
    7. Soliev, Ilkhom & Theesfeld, Insa & Abert, Eileen & Schramm, Wiebke, 2021. "Benefit sharing and conflict transformation: Insights for and from REDD+ forest governance in sub-Saharan Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Augusta Ferreira & Ana Maria Bandeira & Carlos Santos & Inês Ferreira & Brízida Tomé & Alberto J. Costa & Carla Joaquim & Cristina Góis & Denise Curi & Deolinda Meira & Graça Azevedo & Helena Inácio &, 2022. "Can Online Transparency Improve Accountability? The Case of Portuguese Private Social Solidarity Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Jayasuriya Mahapatabendige Ruwani Fernando & Leon Li & Yang (Greg) Hou, 2019. "Corporate governance and default prediction: a reality test," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(24), pages 2669-2686, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Priyanto Priyanto & Amirul Mustofa & Ilyas Masudin & Nevrettia Christantyawati & Wiwiek Harwiki, 2026. "Linking Green Job Satisfaction to Circular Economy Implementation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Climate and Employee Empowerment," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Anyigbah & Yusheng Kong & Bless Kofi Edziah & Ahotovi Thomas Ahoto & Wilhelmina Seyome Ahiaku, 2023. "Board Characteristics and Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Md Lutfur Rahman & Sudipta Bose, 2025. "Firm-level Climate Vulnerability and Corporate Risk-taking: International Evidence," Working Papers DP-2024-36, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    3. Verga Matos, Pedro & Neves, Pedro, 2025. "Wage asymmetries in Portugal: The top executive–worker pay gap and its implications for Sustainable Development Goal 10," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(5).
    4. Wei Zhong & Ling Jin, 2025. "The Impact of Climate Risk Disclosure on Corporate Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Qi Gong & Jiahui Gu & Zhaoyang Kong & Siyan Shen & Xiucheng Dong & Yang Li & Chade Li, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Ratings on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Yan Zhao & Yubin Gao & Diming Hong, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Sustainable Innovation and Economic Resilience: Deciphering ESG Ratings’ Role in Lowering Debt Financing Costs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 4309-4343, March.
    7. Blessing Nyakumwa & Newman Wadesango & Lovemore Sitsha, 2023. "The Impact of Internal Audit Function on Corporate Governance: A Case of NSSA, Zimbabwe (2018-2022)," Journal of Economic and Social Development, Clinical Journals Press, vol. 10(02), pages 01-09.
    8. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Mutee Ur Rahman & Faisal Abbas, 2025. "Exploring bank diversification and performance: evidence from South Asia," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Runhuan Feng & Hong Li & Ming Liu, 2025. "Robo-Advisors Beyond Automation: Principles and Roadmap for AI-Driven Financial Planning," Papers 2509.09922, arXiv.org.
    11. Rohan Kumar Mishra & Frank Obenpong Kwabi & Abhijeet Chandra, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Related Party Transaction and Earnings Management: Evidence from India," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(2), pages 331-369, October.
    12. Weining Li & Ningyu Bei & Liebing Cao, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Investigating the Role of Non-family CEOs in Knowledge Diffusion and Investment Behavior in Family Firms During Succession," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 1860-1886, March.
    13. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:10040-10062 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Li Mingqian, 2024. "Why Transaction Cost Economics Failed and How to Fix It," Papers 2405.09087, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    15. Adriano Bellinvia & Paola Brighi & Valeria Venturelli, 2026. "Banks and climate risk: a bibliometric review and policy perspective," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 1-29, June.
    16. Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Yunhong Hao, 2025. "Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm performance: Moderating role of board gender diversity and sustainability committee," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 636-651, February.
    17. Andreea-Roxana Danci & Ionuț-Adrian Lazar & Gabriela-Mihaela Mureșan, 2025. "Financial analysis in the era of uncertainty: a comprehensive examination," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 971-995, December.
    18. Meryem Ayad & Said El Mezouari, 2022. "Research on the implication of artificial intelligence in accounting subfields: current research trends from bibliometric analysis, and research directions," Post-Print hal-05138659, HAL.
    19. Sameer Al Johani & Adnan Atm, 2022. "Revisiting the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Firm performance: Evidence from British Manufacturing Firms," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 7-32.
    20. Thong, Lik Hong, 2019. "A discussion on performance risk of Dunkin's Brand," MPRA Paper 97266, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Nov 2019.
    21. Maryam Jameelah Mohd Hashim & Mohd Rahim Khamis, 2025. "Waqf Institutions Sustainability Through Corporate Governance, Marketing, Technology, And Legislation," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(6), pages 1083-1098, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2650-:d:1362688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.