IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2363-d1355883.html

Differences in Carbon Intensity of Energy Consumption and Influential Factors between Yangtze River Economic Belt and Yellow River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Wang

    (Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu 610072, China)

  • Shiwei Chen

    (Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu 610072, China)

  • Tiantian Qu

    (Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu 610072, China)

Abstract

The Yangtze River Economic Belt and the Yellow River Basin are significant economic and ecological zones in China, contributing over 70% of the nation’s total carbon emissions, crucial for achieving “peak carbon” and “carbon neutrality” targets. This study examines data spanning 2000 to 2020 from 19 provinces, employing time-series analysis and the Theil index to compare carbon intensity variations in energy consumption between the regions. Findings reveal mean Theil index values of 0.0482 and 0.1699 for the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins, respectively. While the Yangtze River basin displays modest carbon intensity differences with remaining intra-basin disparities, the Yellow River Basin exhibits substantial discrepancies, attributed to both inter-basin and intra-basin factors. Our geodetector underscores the significance of government regulation, population size, and economic development in influencing carbon intensity within the Yangtze River Economic Belt, with impact coefficients exceeding 0.75 while carbon intensity in the Yellow River Basin is influenced by population size, energy consumption, and government regulation, with impact coefficients surpassing 0.8. Additionally, interactions among these factors significantly affect disparities in carbon intensity, suggesting a synergistic effect. We propose leveraging key factors from both basins to orchestrate emissions reduction efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Wang & Shiwei Chen & Tiantian Qu, 2024. "Differences in Carbon Intensity of Energy Consumption and Influential Factors between Yangtze River Economic Belt and Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2363-:d:1355883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. York, Richard & Rosa, Eugene A. & Dietz, Thomas, 2003. "STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 351-365, October.
    2. Cheng, Zhonghua & Li, Lianshui & Liu, Jun, 2018. "Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China's provinces," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2935-2946.
    3. Zhang, Wei & Li, Ke & Zhou, Dequn & Zhang, Wenrui & Gao, Hui, 2016. "Decomposition of intensity of energy-related CO2 emission in Chinese provinces using the LMDI method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 369-381.
    4. Huang, Junbing & Liu, Qiang & Cai, Xiaochen & Hao, Yu & Lei, Hongyan, 2018. "The effect of technological factors on China's carbon intensity: New evidence from a panel threshold model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 32-42.
    5. Liu, Jiaguo & Li, Sujuan & Ji, Qiang, 2021. "Regional differences and driving factors analysis of carbon emission intensity from transport sector in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. Jiaxing Pang & Hengji Li & Chengpeng Lu & Chenyu Lu & Xingpeng Chen, 2020. "Regional Differences and Dynamic Evolution of Carbon Emission Intensity of Agriculture Production in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Fan, Ying & Liu, Lan-Cui & Wu, Gang & Tsai, Hsien-Tang & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2007. "Changes in carbon intensity in China: Empirical findings from 1980-2003," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3-4), pages 683-691, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guomin Li & Hao Fu & Wei Li & Shizheng Tan & Wenjie Xie & Changjie Zhao & Yaqi Wang, 2025. "Carbon Emissions from Food Consumption and Reduction Potential in Urban Residents: A Case Study of Provincial Capitals in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yellow River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaozhou Qi & Huarong Peng & Xiujie Tan, 2019. "The Moderating Effect of R&D Investment on Income and Carbon Emissions in China: Direct and Spatial Spillover Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Zhonghua Cheng & Xiai Shi, 2018. "Can Industrial Structural Adjustment Improve the Total-Factor Carbon Emission Performance in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Huang, Junbing & Wang, Yajun & Lei, Hongyan & Chen, Xiang, 2024. "A technology-driven way to carbon peak and its impact mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    4. Zha, Donglan & Yang, Guanglei & Wang, Qunwei, 2019. "Investigating the driving factors of regional CO2 emissions in China using the IDA-PDA-MMI method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Lin, Boqiang & Li, Zheng, 2020. "Is more use of electricity leading to less carbon emission growth? An analysis with a panel threshold model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. You Zheng & Jian Tang & Jianzhong Xiao, 2025. "The PM2.5 pollution rebound effect and industrial structure adjustment in China: The impact of heterogeneous technological progress and resource dependence," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(8), pages 3860-3887, December.
    7. Xie, Xuan & Shao, Shuai & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Exploring the driving forces and mitigation pathways of CO2 emissions in China’s petroleum refining and coking industry: 1995–2031," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1004-1015.
    8. Gao, Feng & He, Ziwen, 2024. "Digital economy, land resource misallocation and urban carbon emissions in Chinese resource-based cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Huang, Junbing & Li, Xinghao & Wang, Yajun & Lei, Hongyan, 2021. "The effect of energy patents on China's carbon emissions: Evidence from the STIRPAT model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Zhang, Pan & Wang, Huan, 2022. "Do provincial energy policies and energy intensity targets help reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    11. Li, Huanan & Mu, Hailin & Zhang, Ming & Gui, Shusen, 2012. "Analysis of regional difference on impact factors of China’s energy – Related CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 319-326.
    12. Min Wang & Yunbei Ma, 2024. "Spatial Heterogeneity and Clustering of County-Level Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Zhixing Yang & Xingyu Chen & Jiandong Chen & Ming Gao, 2025. "The Heterogeneous Relationship Between China’s Low-Carbon Economic Scale and Quality: A County-Level Analysis from the Perspective of Administrative Division," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Lou, Runchi, 2022. "Digital financial inclusion and carbon neutrality: Evidence from non-linear analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Xianen Wang & Baoyang Qin & Hanning Wang & Xize Dong & Haiyan Duan, 2022. "Carbon Mitigation Pathways of Urban Transportation under Cold Climatic Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Chang, Chun-Ping & Dong, Minyi & Sui, Bo & Chu, Yin, 2019. "Driving forces of global carbon emissions: From time- and spatial-dynamic perspectives," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-80.
    17. Yanwen Sheng & Yi Miao & Jinping Song & Hongyan Shen, 2019. "The Moderating Effect of Innovation on the Relationship between Urbanization and CO 2 Emissions: Evidence from Three Major Urban Agglomerations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2017. "Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data of three sectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 772-787.
    19. Wu, Bei & Ma, Wenxia & Zhao, Qi, 2025. "Digital economy and urban green transformation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    20. Kerui Du & Boqiang Lin & Chunping Xie, 2017. "Exploring Change in China’s Carbon Intensity: A Decomposition Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2363-:d:1355883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.