IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1411-d1335260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green versus Grey Framing: Exploring the Mechanism behind the Negative Footprint Illusion in Environmental Sustainability Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Gorissen

    (School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Bert Weijters

    (Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

  • Berre Deltomme

    (Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

Abstract

Given the complexity of assessing the environmental sustainability of products, consumers rely on cognitive strategies to simplify complex information and develop quick judgments, often referred to as heuristics, when processing eco-information. One of these heuristics is called ‘the Negative Footprint Illusion’: Consumers erroneously estimate the total environmental impact of a combination of a green and non-green product as lower than the same non-green product alone. In this research, we test this bias and explore its underlying mechanism. We evoke a more summative vs. more evaluative mindset by framing the response scales negatively (in terms of environmental damage, referred to as ‘grey scaling’) vs. positively (in terms of environmental friendliness, referred to as ‘green scaling’). This is carried out by using an online between-subject experiment in which respondents either respond on an evaluative response scale (green scaling), or a summative response scale (grey scaling). A hamburger and bio-apple were used as stimuli (either shown together or apart). First, the results show that the negative footprint is only apparent in the green scaling condition. Second, respondents who score higher on environmental concern show a stronger negative footprint illusion for the green scaling condition. Our study not only elucidates the cognitive mechanisms driving the negative footprint illusion but also offers strategic directions for both theoretical advancement and practical applications in environmental decision-making, highlighting effective ways to mitigate this bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Gorissen & Bert Weijters & Berre Deltomme, 2024. "Green versus Grey Framing: Exploring the Mechanism behind the Negative Footprint Illusion in Environmental Sustainability Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-10, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1411-:d:1335260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vlaeminck, Pieter & Jiang, Ting & Vranken, Liesbet, 2014. "Food labeling and eco-friendly consumption: Experimental evidence from a Belgian supermarket," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 180-190.
    2. Andreas Klein & Helfried Moosbrugger, 2000. "Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 457-474, December.
    3. Anna DeCastellarnau, 2018. "A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: a literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1523-1559, July.
    4. Daniel Moran & Richard Wood & Edgar Hertwich & Kim Mattson & Joao F. D. Rodriguez & Karin Schanes & John Barrett, 2020. "Quantifying the potential for consumer-oriented policy to reduce European and foreign carbon emissions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(S1), pages 28-38, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    2. Coralie Hellwig & Kim Bolton & Greta Häggblom-Kronlöf & Kamran Rousta, 2022. "Aspects Affecting Food Choice in Daily Life as Well as Drivers and Barriers to Engagement with Fungi-Based Food—A Qualitative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Anastasia Stathopoulou & Tommy Kweku Quansah & George Balabanis, 2022. "The Blinding Effects of Team Identification on Sports Corruption: Cross-Cultural Evidence from Sub-Saharan African Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 511-529, August.
    4. Maggioni, Isabella & Sands, Sean & Kachouie, Reza & Tsarenko, Yelena, 2019. "Shopping for well-being: The role of consumer decision-making styles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 21-32.
    5. Yokessa, Maïmouna & Marette, Stéphan, 2019. "A Review of Eco-labels and their Economic Impact," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(1-2), pages 119-163, April.
    6. Takahashi, Ryo & Todo, Yasuyuki & Funaki, Yukihiko, 2018. "How Can We Motivate Consumers to Purchase Certified Forest Coffee? Evidence From a Laboratory Randomized Experiment Using Eye-trackers," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 107-121.
    7. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Ratzmann, Martin & Kraus, Sascha, 2021. "Anti-aging: How innovation is shaped by firm age and mutual knowledge creation in an alliance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 422-429.
    8. Seon, Youngwoon & Smith-Adcock, Sondra, 2023. "Adolescents’ meaning in life as a resilience factor between bullying victimization and life satisfaction," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    9. Yihan Huang & Daehwan Kim, 2023. "How Does Service Quality Improve Consumer Loyalty in Sports Fitness Centers? The Moderating Role of Sport Involvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Elofsson, Katarina & Bengtsson, Niklas & Matsdotter, Elina & Arntyr, Johan, 2016. "The impact of climate information on milk demand: Evidence from a field experiment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 14-23.
    11. Marine Desorge & Anne Marie A. M. Lacroix & Laurent Muller & Charles Pernin & Celia Potdevin & Bernard Ruffieux, 2017. "L'étiquetage au service d'une alimentation durable : le point de vue des consommateurs," Working Papers halshs-01537806, HAL.
    12. Crosetto, P. & Lacroix, A. & Muller, L. & Ruffieux, B., 2018. "Nutritional and economic impact of 5 alternative front-of-pack nutritional labels: experimental evidence," Working Papers 2018-11, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    13. Ingo S. Seifert & Julia M. Rohrer & Boris Egloff & Stefan C. Schmukle, 2021. "The Development of the Rank-Order Stability of the Big Five across the Life Span," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1156, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    14. Yajun Wu & Xia Kang, 2021. "A Moderated Mediation Model of Expectancy-Value Interactions, Engagement, and Foreign Language Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    15. Graciela Corral de Zubielqui & Noel Lindsay & Wendy Lindsay & Janice Jones, 2019. "Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: a study of knowledge transfer in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 145-164, June.
    16. Eelen, Jiska & Özturan, Peren & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2017. "The differential impact of brand loyalty on traditional and online word of mouth: The moderating roles of self-brand connection and the desire to help the brand," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 872-891.
    17. Ranjith Vijayakumar & Ji Yeh Choi & Eun Hwa Jung, 2022. "A Unified Neural Network Framework for Extended Redundancy Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1503-1528, December.
    18. Li, Tongzhe & McCluskey, Jill J. & Messer, Kent D., 2018. "Ignorance Is Bliss? Experimental Evidence on Wine Produced from Grapes Irrigated with Recycled Water," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 100-110.
    19. Cicala, John E. & Bush, Alan J. & Sherrell, Daniel L. & Deitz, George D., 2014. "Does transparency influence the ethical behavior of salespeople?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1787-1795.
    20. James J Murphy & Molly Conlin & Bryan Haugstad, 2023. "An experimental test of cause-related marketing and charitable giving," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 75(4), pages 890-901.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1411-:d:1335260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.