IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1361-d1334155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergency Logistics Facilities Location Dual-Objective Modeling in Uncertain Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Xu

    (Sino-German College, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Yifan Ma

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Chang Liu

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Ying Ji

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
    School of Economics and Management, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

The uncertainty of post-earthquake disaster situations can affect the efficiency of rescue site selection, material, and personnel dispatching, as well as the sustainability of related resources. It is crucial for decision-makers to make decisions to mitigate risks. This paper first presents a dual-objective model for locating emergency logistics facilities, taking into account location costs, human resource scheduling costs, transportation time, and uncertainties in demand and road conditions. Then, stochastic programming and robust optimization methods are utilized to cater to decision-makers with varying risk preferences. A risk-preference-based stochastic programming model is introduced to handle the potential risks of extreme disasters. Additionally, robust models are constructed for two uncertain environments. Finally, the study uses the Wenchuan earthquake as a case study for the pre-locating of emergency logistics facilities and innovatively compares the differences in the effects of models constructed using different uncertainty methods. Experimental results indicate that changes in weight coefficients and unit transportation costs significantly impact the objective function. This paper suggests that decision-makers should balance cost and rescue efficiency by choosing appropriate weight coefficients according to the rescue stage. It also shows that risk level and robust conservatism can significantly alter the objective function. While stochastic programming models offer economic advantages, robust optimization provides better robustness.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Xu & Yifan Ma & Chang Liu & Ying Ji, 2024. "Emergency Logistics Facilities Location Dual-Objective Modeling in Uncertain Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-34, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1361-:d:1334155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Kai & Jiang, Yiping & Yuan, Yufei & Zhao, Lindu, 2015. "Modeling multiple humanitarian objectives in emergency response to large-scale disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-17.
    2. Jin, Ting & Yang, Xiangfeng, 2021. "Monotonicity theorem for the uncertain fractional differential equation and application to uncertain financial market," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 203-221.
    3. L N Van Wassenhove, 2006. "Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 475-489, May.
    4. Basak, Suleyman & Shapiro, Alexander, 2001. "Value-at-Risk-Based Risk Management: Optimal Policies and Asset Prices," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 371-405.
    5. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Kuo, Hsin-Tsz, 2022. "Emergency logistics management—Review and propositions for future research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Naomi Miller & Andrzej Ruszczyński, 2011. "Risk-Averse Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programming: Modeling and Decomposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 125-132, February.
    7. A. Ben-Tal & A. Nemirovski, 1998. "Robust Convex Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 769-805, November.
    8. Muhammad Basharat & Muhammad Tayyib Riaz & M. Qasim Jan & Chong Xu & Saima Riaz, 2021. "A review of landslides related to the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake: implication and future challenges," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 1-30, August.
    9. Jianhui Du & Peng Wu & Yiqing Wang & Dan Yang, 2023. "Multi-stage humanitarian emergency logistics: robust decisions in uncertain environment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(1), pages 899-922, January.
    10. Balcik, Burcu & Yanıkoğlu, İhsan, 2020. "A robust optimization approach for humanitarian needs assessment planning under travel time uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 40-57.
    11. Wenjun Ni & Jia Shu & Miao Song, 2018. "Location and Emergency Inventory Pre†Positioning for Disaster Response Operations: Min†Max Robust Model and a Case Study of Yushu Earthquake," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(1), pages 160-183, January.
    12. Ling Shen & Fengming Tao & Yuhe Shi & Ruiru Qin, 2019. "Optimization of Location-Routing Problem in Emergency Logistics Considering Carbon Emissions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Paul, Jomon Aliyas & MacDonald, Leo, 2016. "Optimal location, capacity and timing of stockpiles for improved hurricane preparedness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 11-28.
    14. Kovacs, Gyöngyi & Moshtari, Mohammad, 2019. "A roadmap for higher research quality in humanitarian operations: A methodological perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 395-408.
    15. Paul, Jomon A. & Zhang, Minjiao, 2019. "Supply location and transportation planning for hurricanes: A two-stage stochastic programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 108-125.
    16. Wapee Manopiniwes & Takashi Irohara, 2017. "Stochastic optimisation model for integrated decisions on relief supply chains: preparedness for disaster response," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 979-996, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Lotfi, M.M. & Baghaian, Atefe & Ruiz, Rubén & Rezapour, Shabnam, 2020. "Mass casualty management in disaster scene: A systematic review of OR&MS research in humanitarian operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 787-819.
    2. Paul, Jomon A. & Zhang, Minjiao, 2019. "Supply location and transportation planning for hurricanes: A two-stage stochastic programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 108-125.
    3. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Ahmadi, Hossein & Gastélum-Chavira, Diego & Ahumada-Valenzuela, Omar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel, 2023. "Humanitarian logistics optimization models: An investigation of decision-maker involvement and directions to promote implementation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Sabbaghtorkan, Monir & Batta, Rajan & He, Qing, 2020. "Prepositioning of assets and supplies in disaster operations management: Review and research gap identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 1-19.
    5. Wang, Xinfang (Jocelyn) & Paul, Jomon A., 2020. "Robust optimization for hurricane preparedness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Xuehong Gao, 2022. "A bi-level stochastic optimization model for multi-commodity rebalancing under uncertainty in disaster response," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 115-148, December.
    7. Dönmez, Zehranaz & Kara, Bahar Y. & Karsu, Özlem & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2021. "Humanitarian facility location under uncertainty: Critical review and future prospects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Baharmand, Hossein & Comes, Tina & Lauras, Matthieu, 2019. "Bi-objective multi-layer location–allocation model for the immediate aftermath of sudden-onset disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 86-110.
    9. Dang, Duc-Cuong & Currie, Christine S.M. & Onggo, Bhakti Stephan & Chaerani, Diah & Achmad, Audi Luqmanul Hakim, 2023. "Budget allocation of food procurement for natural disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 754-768.
    10. Liu, Kanglin & Zhang, Hengliang & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2021. "The efficiency, equity and effectiveness of location strategies in humanitarian logistics: A robust chance-constrained approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Cao, Cejun & Liu, Yang & Tang, Ou & Gao, Xuehong, 2021. "A fuzzy bi-level optimization model for multi-period post-disaster relief distribution in sustainable humanitarian supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    12. Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Morshedlou, Nazanin, 2021. "Impact of timing in post-warning prepositioning decisions on performance measures of disaster management: A real-life application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 312-335.
    13. Wang, Duo & Yang, Kai & Yang, Lixing & Dong, Jianjun, 2023. "Two-stage distributionally robust optimization for disaster relief logistics under option contract and demand ambiguity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    14. Yichen Lu & Chao Yang & Jun Yang, 2022. "A multi-objective humanitarian pickup and delivery vehicle routing problem with drones," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 291-353, December.
    15. Félicia Saïah & Diego Vega & Harwin de Vries & Joakim Kembro, 2023. "Process modularity, supply chain responsiveness, and moderators: The Médecins Sans Frontières response to the Covid‐19 pandemic," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1490-1511, May.
    16. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency Relief Routing Models for Injured Victims Considering Equity and Priority," Post-Print hal-02879681, HAL.
    17. Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Kamalini Ramdas & Alp Sungu, 2022. "Social impact operations at the global base of the pyramid," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4364-4378, December.
    18. Afshin Kamyabniya & M. M. Lotfi & Mohsen Naderpour & Yuehwern Yih, 2018. "Robust Platelet Logistics Planning in Disaster Relief Operations Under Uncertainty: a Coordinated Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 759-782, August.
    19. Moshtari, Mohammad & Altay, Nezih & Heikkilä, Jussi & Gonçalves, Paulo, 2021. "Procurement in humanitarian organizations: Body of knowledge and practitioner's challenges," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    20. Zhang, Guowei & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Humanitarian relief network assessment using collaborative truck-and-drone system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1361-:d:1334155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.