IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1041-d1326452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grill and Chill: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of Private Household Barbecuing in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Shaoran Geng

    (Institute for Acoustics and Building Physics, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Kevin Christopher Dorling

    (Institute for Acoustics and Building Physics, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Tobias Manuel Prenzel

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Stefan Albrecht

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Rising environmental consciousness has prompted increased scrutiny of the environmental impact of everyday activities, such as barbecuing—a popular summertime activity in Germany. This study aimed to explore the environmental impacts of three grilling techniques, charcoal (including reusable types such as swivel, round, and kettle grills, as well as disposable charcoal grills), gas, and electric grills, utilizing a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach including the manufacturing of grills, consumption of energy sources and grilling ingredients, as well as the end-of-life of the grills. Five impact categories were considered: global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), abiotic depletion potential fossil (ADP), and land use (LU) according to the CML2016 and ReCiPe 2016 methodology. This study found that a barbeque event for four people results in GWP, AP, EP, ADP, and LU values ranging from 18 to 20 kg CO 2 -eq., 174 to 179 g SO 2 -eq., 166 to 167 g PO 4 -eq., 102 to 138 MJ, and 36 to 38 m 2 annual crop-eq., respectively, across different types of grills. Furthermore, the ingredients proved to be the most significant contributor, surpassing 70% in all impact categories. Among the three types of grills, the electric grill emerged as the most environmentally friendly, while the disposable grill had the greatest environmental impact across the majority of categories. Lastly, the environmental impacts of varying consumer behaviors were evaluated to potentially assist consumers in adopting more sustainable grilling practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaoran Geng & Kevin Christopher Dorling & Tobias Manuel Prenzel & Stefan Albrecht, 2024. "Grill and Chill: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of Private Household Barbecuing in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1041-:d:1326452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1041/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1041/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huerta, Adriana Rivera & Güereca, Leonor Patricia & Lozano, María de la Salud Rubio, 2016. "Environmental impact of beef production in Mexico through life cycle assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 44-53.
    2. Konstantin Stadler & Richard Wood & Tatyana Bulavskaya & Carl†Johan Södersten & Moana Simas & Sarah Schmidt & Arkaitz Usubiaga & José Acosta†Fernández & Jeroen Kuenen & Martin Bruckner & Stefan, 2018. "EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi†Regional Input†Output Tables," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(3), pages 502-515, June.
    3. Pelletier, Nathan & Pirog, Rich & Rasmussen, Rebecca, 2010. "Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(6), pages 380-389, July.
    4. Grignon-Massé, Laurent & Rivière, Philippe & Adnot, Jérôme, 2011. "Strategies for reducing the environmental impacts of room air conditioners in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 2152-2164, April.
    5. George Afrane & Augustine Ntiamoah, 2011. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Charcoal, Biogas, and Liquefied Petroleum Gas as Cooking Fuels in Ghana," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(4), pages 539-549, August.
    6. Pelletier, N., 2008. "Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 67-73, September.
    7. Alessio Cimini & Mauro Moresi, 2018. "Effect of Brewery Size on the Main Process Parameters and Cradle‐to‐Grave Carbon Footprint of Lager Beer," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1139-1155, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pelletier, N. & Lammers, P. & Stender, D. & Pirog, R., 2010. "Life cycle assessment of high- and low-profitability commodity and deep-bedded niche swine production systems in the Upper Midwestern United States," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(9), pages 599-608, November.
    2. Raymond L. Desjardins & Devon E. Worth & Xavier P. C. Vergé & Dominique Maxime & Jim Dyer & Darrel Cerkowniak, 2012. "Carbon Footprint of Beef Cattle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(12), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Zifei Liu & Yang Liu, 2018. "Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from animal production," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(4), pages 627-638, August.
    4. Francesco Bandarin & Enrico Ciciotti & Marco Cremaschi & Giovanna Madera & Paolo Perulli & Diana Shendrikova, 2020. "Which Future for Cities after COVID-19 An international Survey," Reports, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, October.
    5. Nikolaos Kalyviotis, 2025. "Life cycle assessment tools for road design: analysing linearity assumptions," Papers 2506.13896, arXiv.org.
    6. Gazzarin, Christian & Jan, Pierrick, 2024. "Sustainable intensification of grass-based beef production systems in alpine regions: How to increase economic efficiency while preserving biodiversity?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. A. R. Sayapova & R. E. Rakoch, 2023. "Concept of Global Value Chains in Quantitative Measurements of Russian Foreign Economic Relations," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 852-860, December.
    8. Fernández-Amador, Octavio & Francois, Joseph F. & Oberdabernig, Doris A. & Tomberger, Patrick, 2023. "Energy footprints and the international trade network: A new dataset. Is the European Union doing it better?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    9. Venkat, Kumar, 2012. "The Climate Change and Economic Impacts of Food Waste in the United States," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(4), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Sunil Prasad Lohani & Renisha Acharya & Poushan Shrestha & Sundar Shrestha & K. C. Manisha & Prajal Pradhan, 2024. "Sustainable biogas production potential in Nepal using waste biomass: A spatial analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4770-4781, October.
    11. Stede, Jan & Pauliuk, Stefan & Hardadi, Gilang & Neuhoff, Karsten, 2021. "Carbon pricing of basic materials: Incentives and risks for the value chain and consumers," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 189.
    12. Brizga, Janis & Räty, Tarmo, 2024. "Production, consumption and trade-based forest land and resource footprints in the Nordic and Baltic countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Helen Harwatt & Joan Sabaté & Gidon Eshel & Sam Soret & William Ripple, 2017. "Substituting beans for beef as a contribution toward US climate change targets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 261-270, July.
    14. Jacques, Pierre & Delannoy, Louis & Andrieu, Baptiste & Yilmaz, Devrim & Jeanmart, Hervé & Godin, Antoine, 2023. "Assessing the economic consequences of an energy transition through a biophysical stock-flow consistent model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    15. White, Robin R. & Brady, Michael & Capper, Judith L. & Johnson, Kristen A., 2014. "Optimizing diet and pasture management to improve sustainability of U.S. beef production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-12.
    16. Bertram F. de Boer & Elmer Rietveld & João F. D. Rodrigues & Arnold Tukker, 2021. "Global environmental and socio‐economic impacts of a transition to a circular economy in metal and electrical products: A Dutch case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1264-1271, October.
    17. Joel Millward-Hopkins & Vivien Fisch-Romito & Sascha Nick & Emile Chevrel, 2025. "Energy requirements for securing wellbeing in Switzerland and the space for affluence and inequality," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Andrea Bragaglio & Ada Braghieri & Corrado Pacelli & Fabio Napolitano, 2020. "Environmental Impacts of Beef as Corrected for the Provision of Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Walzberg, Julien & Dandres, Thomas & Merveille, Nicolas & Cheriet, Mohamed & Samson, Réjean, 2020. "Should we fear the rebound effect in smart homes?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    20. Bonnin, Dennis & Tabacco, Ernesto & Borreani, Giorgio, 2021. "Variability of greenhouse gas emissions and economic performances on 10 Piedmontese beef farms in North Italy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1041-:d:1326452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.