IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p548-d1315405.html

Exploring Willingness to Pay across Different Passenger Traits

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Džupka

    (Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Kosice, Němcovej 32, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Radovan Dráb

    (Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Kosice, Němcovej 32, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Marek Gróf

    (Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Kosice, Němcovej 32, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Tomáš Štofa

    (Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Kosice, Němcovej 32, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

In recent years, the transportation landscape has seen a notable shift towards shared mobility, driven by its advantages over traditional systems fraught with inefficiencies. This shift has ushered in demand-responsive transport (DRT) systems, enabled by mobile technology. DRT offers a promising solution for the sustainability of public transport, also for rural Slovakia; however, higher individual journey costs and the necessity for online booking create adoption barriers for this new form. This paper conducts a thorough willingness-to-pay analysis in seven rural Slovak settlements, with the goal of understanding variations and comparing the findings with the existing research. Location, household size, age, car and train usage, and previous experiences with bus transport significantly impact the willingness to pay. Consequently, tailored DRT strategies are necessary for different target groups. To maximize the efficiency of this service, integrating DRT into the regional or national public transportation network is recommended. Insights from this study hold significant implications for policymakers tasked with transforming regional transportation, particularly by integrating DRT into fixed-route bus systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Džupka & Radovan Dráb & Marek Gróf & Tomáš Štofa, 2024. "Exploring Willingness to Pay across Different Passenger Traits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:548-:d:1315405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/548/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/548/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schasché, Stephanie E. & Sposato, Robert G. & Hampl, Nina, 2022. "The dilemma of demand-responsive transport services in rural areas: Conflicting expectations and weak user acceptance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 43-54.
    2. Fahimeh Golbabaei & Tan Yigitcanlar & Alexander Paz & Jonathan Bunker, 2023. "Perceived Opportunities and Challenges of Autonomous Demand-Responsive Transit Use: What Are the Socio-Demographic Predictors?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Mulalic, Ismir & Rouwendal, Jan, 2020. "Does improving public transport decrease car ownership? Evidence from a residential sorting model for the Copenhagen metropolitan area," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Chao Wang & Mohammed Quddus & Marcus Enoch & Tim Ryley & Lisa Davison, 2014. "Multilevel modelling of Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) trips in Greater Manchester based on area-wide socio-economic data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 589-610, May.
    5. Jooyoung Kim, 2020. "Assessment of the DRT System Based on an Optimal Routing Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-9, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Sangen & Li, Chun & Wu, Weitiao & Yang, Ying, 2025. "Exploring the determinants of demand-responsive transit acceptance in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 150-163.
    2. Flipo, Aurore & Ortar, Nathalie & Sallustio, Madeleine, 2023. "Can the transition to sustainable mobility be fair in rural areas? A stakeholder approach to mobility justice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 136-143.
    3. Schasché, Stephanie E. & Sposato, Robert G. & Hampl, Nina, 2022. "The dilemma of demand-responsive transport services in rural areas: Conflicting expectations and weak user acceptance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 43-54.
    4. Gregory Verdugo & Malak Kandoussi, 2025. "Will you follow your job to the suburbs? Commuting, locational amenities and wages in a large metro area," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-05447239, HAL.
    5. Hora Jakub & Císařová Hana, 2025. "Forms of Booking on-demand Transport," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 49-58.
    6. Kudłak, Robert & Kisiała, Wojciech & Kołsut, Bartłomiej, 2024. "Systemic transformation, political reforms and car ownership in Poland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Raoul Rothfeld & Mengying Fu & Miloš Balać & Constantinos Antoniou, 2021. "Potential Urban Air Mobility Travel Time Savings: An Exploratory Analysis of Munich, Paris, and San Francisco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Borghorst, Malte & Mulalic, Ismir & van Ommeren, Jos, 2024. "Commuting, gender and children," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Chen, Enhui & Liu, Yang & Yang, Min & Ye, Zhirui & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2024. "The sustainability appeal of urban rail transit," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Knierim, Lukas & Schlüter, Jan Christian, 2021. "The attitude of potentially less mobile people towards demand responsive transport in a rural area in central Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Xiao, Haohan & Xu, Min & Wang, Shuaian, 2025. "Does vehicle purchase tax effectively restrict car ownership and promote public transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 104-117.
    12. Vij, Akshay & Ryan, Stacey & Sampson, Spring & Harris, Susan, 2020. "Consumer preferences for on-demand transport in Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 823-839.
    13. Gillingham, Kenneth & Munk-Nielsen, Anders, 2019. "A tale of two tails: Commuting and the fuel price response in driving," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 27-40.
    14. Ghimire, Subid & Bardaka, Eleni & Monast, Kai & Wang, Juan & Wright, Waugh, 2024. "Policy, management, and operation practices in U.S. microtransit systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 259-278.
    15. Berrada, Jaâfar & Poulhès, Alexis, 2021. "Economic and socioeconomic assessment of replacing conventional public transit with demand responsive transit services in low-to-medium density areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 317-334.
    16. Boram Woo & Donghoun Lee & Yoojin Chang & Sungjin Park & Sehyun Tak, 2024. "An Optimal Road Network Extraction Methodology for an Autonomous Driving-Based Demand-Responsive Transit Service Considering Operational Design Domains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Hybel, Jesper & Mulalic, Ismir, 2022. "Transportation and quality of life," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 107-125.
    18. Alex Chernoff & Andrea N. Craig, 2022. "Distributional And Housing Price Effects From Public Transit Investment: Evidence From Vancouver," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(1), pages 475-509, February.
    19. Wu, Weitiao & Zhu, Yanchen & Liu, Ronghui, 2024. "Dynamic scheduling of flexible bus services with hybrid requests and fairness: Heuristics-guided multi-agent reinforcement learning with imitation learning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    20. Bøje-Kovács, Bence János & Mulalic, Ismir & Schultz-Nielsen, Marie Louise, 2024. "The Domino Effect: Exploring Residential Mobility in the Aftermath of Municipal Mergers," Working Papers 12-2024, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:548-:d:1315405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.