IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9487-d1511522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Ecosystems and Sustainable High Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Wu

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Mingyang Li

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Huanshui Huang

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

The innovation ecosystem has a significant impact on regional innovation development. Based on the “actor-resource-environment” analytical framework, this study takes nine cities in mainland China within the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) from 2012 to 2022 as case studies. By applying a comprehensive evaluation model and kernel density estimation, the study analyzes the development level and dynamic evolution of the innovation ecosystem in the GBA. Furthermore, using a mixed-method approach of dynamic QCA and NCA, the study explores the pathways to achieving high innovation performance in the GBA. The key findings are as follows: (1) The comprehensive score of the GBA innovation ecosystem shows a rising trend, with a pattern of multi-polarization, “top-tier effect”, and the persistence of strong performance within the region. (2) Technological innovation actors and the digital economy environment have become necessary conditions for achieving sustained high innovation performance in the GBA. Inter-group results highlight the significant temporal effects of technological innovation actors, R&D personnel input, and a public service environment, which exhibit S-shaped, W-shaped, and U-shaped patterns, respectively. Intra-group results reveal notable regional differences in the necessity level of seven conditional variables across GBA cities. (3) There are two types of innovation ecosystems driving high innovation performance in the GBA: actor-driven and resource–environment synergy-driven ecosystems. While no significant cross-time or cross-case effects exist between these two types, inter-group consistency changes indicate that the innovation ecosystem in the GBA has become more mature and stable since the establishment of the GBA in 2017.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Wu & Mingyang Li & Huanshui Huang, 2024. "Innovation Ecosystems and Sustainable High Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9487-:d:1511522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9487/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9487/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cooke, Philip & Gomez Uranga, Mikel & Etxebarria, Goio, 1997. "Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 475-491, December.
    2. Fang Huang & Chong Wu, 2024. "Impact of Digital Economy on Carbon Emissions and Its Mechanism: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Shuo Yang & Wei Guo & Tianjun Xu & Tongtong Liu, 2024. "Analysis on the Evolution Characteristics of Rural Tourism Public Service System from the Perspective of Digitalization—Empirical Evidence from the Silk Road Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Wensheng Xiao & Haojia Kong & Lifan Shi & Valentina Boamah & Decai Tang, 2022. "The Impact of Innovation-Driven Strategy on High-Quality Economic Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Chris Freeman & Luc Soete, 1997. "The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 3, volume 1, number 0262061953, December.
    6. Bjorn Asheim & Helen Lawton Smith & Christine Oughton, 2011. "Regional Innovation Systems: Theory, Empirics and Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 875-891.
    7. Xiaonan Fan & Sainan Ren & Yang Liu, 2023. "The Driving Factors of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency—A Study Based on the Dynamic QCA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neij, Lena & Heiskanen, Eva & Strupeit, Lars, 2017. "The deployment of new energy technologies and the need for local learning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 274-283.
    2. Weidenfeld, Adi & Clifton, Nick, 2025. "Investigating the systemic nature of knowledge networks of regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Caviggioli, F. & Colombelli, A. & De Marco, A. & Scellato, G. & Ughetto, E., 2023. "The impact of university patenting on the technological specialization of European regions: a technology-level analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Yanhua Li & Tingyu Zhang, 2025. "How Does the Digital Ecosystem Foster New Quality Productive Forces? A Dynamic QCA of Sustainable Development Pathways in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Anna Golejewska, 2012. "Rola instytucji w gospodarce opartej na wiedzy: aspekt regionalny," Working Papers of Economics of European Integration Division 1202, The Univeristy of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics, Economics of European Integration Division.
    6. Bajmócy, Zoltán & Vas, Zsófia, 2012. "Az innovációs rendszerek 25 éve. Szakirodalmi áttekintés evolúciós közgazdaságtani megközelítésben [25 years of innovation systems. A literature review from the angle of evolutionary economics]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1233-1256.
    7. Mehmet Güney Celbiş & Pui-Hang Wong & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "Innovativeness, Work Flexibility, and Place Characteristics: A Spatial Econometric and Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2023. "Case study research on innovation systems: paradox, dialectical analysis and resolution," Working Papers 65, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised 15 May 2023.
    9. Van Lancker, Jonas & Mondelaers, Koen & Wauters, Erwin & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2016. "The Organizational Innovation System: A systemic framework for radical innovation at the organizational level," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 52, pages 40-50.
    10. Iammarino, Simona & Padilla-Pérez, Ramon & von Tunzelmann, Nick, 2008. "Technological Capabilities and Global-Local Interactions: The Electronics Industry in Two Mexican Regions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1980-2003, October.
    11. Thomas J. Hannigan & Alessandra Perri & Vittoria Giada Scalera, 2016. "The Dispersed Multinational: Does Connectedness Across Spatial Dimensions Lead to Broader Technological Search?," Working Papers 11, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    12. Claudia Werker & Vladimir Korzinov & Scott Cunningham, 2019. "Formation and output of collaborations: the role of proximity in German nanotechnology," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 697-719, April.
    13. Shi, Xing & Wu, Yanrui & Fu, Dahai, 2020. "Does University-Industry collaboration improve innovation efficiency? Evidence from Chinese Firms⋄," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 39-53.
    14. Frieder Mayer–Krahmer & Marianne Kulicke, 2002. "Gründungen an der Schnittstelle zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft – die Rolle der Hochschulen," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 3(3), pages 257-277, August.
    15. Adi Weidenfeld & Nick Clifton, 2023. "The Evolution of Transnational Knowledge Networks of Cities: Outlining a Future Research Agenda," Working Papers 2023-14, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    16. Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes & Luís Ferreira & José Oliveira, 2023. "Science and Technology Parks: Opening the Pandora’s Box of Regional Development," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(3), pages 2787-2810, September.
    17. Dohse, Dirk, 2000. "Technology policy and the regions -- the case of the BioRegio contest," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1111-1133, December.
    18. Maria Grazia Zoia & Laura Barbieri & Flavia Cortelezzi & Giovanni Marseguerra, 2018. "The determinants of Italian firms’ technological competencies and capabilities," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(4), pages 453-476, December.
    19. Domingos Santos & Maria João Simões, 2014. "Regional innovation systems in Portugal: a critical evaluation," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 28, pages 37-56.
    20. Steinle, Claus & Schiele, Holger, 2002. "When do industries cluster?: A proposal on how to assess an industry's propensity to concentrate at a single region or nation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 849-858, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9487-:d:1511522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.