IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9319-d1507455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergizing Systems Thinking and Technology-Enhanced Learning for Sustainable Education Using the Flow Theory Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Brina Kurent

    (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva Ploscad 16, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Stanislav Avsec

    (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva Ploscad 16, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

In an era where digital technologies are integral to daily life and sustainable education is increasingly critical, developing higher-order thinking skills with appropriate information and communication technology (ICT) support is crucial for achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The purpose of this study was to examine synergies of systems thinking and technology-enhanced learning from the perspective of flow theory within the context of sustainable education. We surveyed more than 65 pre-service preschool teachers engaged in a design, technology, and engineering (DTE) course at the University of Ljubljana. Mapping of systems thinking revealed that pre-service preschool teachers needed support regarding feedback and understanding the interrelationship dimension of systems thinking—essential components of sustainable education. Predictive and mediation analyses yielded noteworthy results. Participants in the ICT-enhanced DTE course rated their cognitive and social engagement above the mid-point of the scale, with this higher engagement correlating with higher systems thinking crucial for sustainable education. In contrast, their aesthetic engagement was below the mid-point of the scale. Experiencing a flow state during ICT activities positively influenced systems thinking, particularly in terms of clear goals and autotelic experiences. Flow theory thus emerges as a solid and appropriate framework to use for studying synergies in technology-enhanced systems thinking for sustainable education. These findings underscore the importance of integrating systems thinking into curricula to enhance learning outcomes and prepare students for future challenges, thereby contributing to the achievement of SDGs through sustainable education.

Suggested Citation

  • Brina Kurent & Stanislav Avsec, 2024. "Synergizing Systems Thinking and Technology-Enhanced Learning for Sustainable Education Using the Flow Theory Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-42, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9319-:d:1507455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk & Agnieszka Żabicka & Agata Gawlak & Joanna Gil-Mastalerczyk, 2023. "Leveraging Systems Thinking, Engagement, and Digital Competencies to Enhance First-Year Architecture Students’ Achievement in Design-Based Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-33, October.
    2. Şebnem Feriver & Refika Olgan & Gaye Teksöz & Matthias Barth, 2019. "Systems Thinking Skills of Preschool Children in Early Childhood Education Contexts from Turkey and Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Ruiqi Deng, 2021. "Emotionally Engaged Learners Are More Satisfied with Online Courses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Ali Saleh Alammary, 2024. "Optimizing Components Selection in Blended Learning: Toward Sustainable Students Engagement and Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-30, June.
    5. Ching-Yun Hsu & Ting-Ting Wu, 2023. "Application of Business Simulation Games in Flipped Classrooms to Facilitate Student Engagement and Higher-Order Thinking Skills for Sustainable Learning Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Wayne Velicer, 1976. "Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(3), pages 321-327, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rok Gabrovšek & David Rihtaršič, 2025. "Custom Generative Artificial Intelligence Tutors in Action: An Experimental Evaluation of Prompt Strategies in STEM Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stevanovic Dalibor, 2016. "Common time variation of parameters in reduced-form macroeconomic models," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 159-183, April.
    2. Orazio Attanasio & Sarah Cattan & Emla Fitzsimons & Costas Meghir & Marta Rubio-Codina, 2020. "Estimating the Production Function for Human Capital: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Colombia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(1), pages 48-85, January.
    3. Zaitun Mohd Saman & Ab Hamid Siti-Azrin & Azizah Othman & Yee Cheng Kueh, 2021. "The Validity and Reliability of the Malay Version of the Cyberbullying Scale among Secondary School Adolescents in Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Orazio Attanasio & Sarah Cattan & Emla Fitzsimons & Costas Meghir & Marta Rubio-Codina, 2015. "Estimating the Production Function for Human Capital: Results from a Randomized Control Trial in Colombia," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1987, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0012412 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. McQueen, Michael & Clifton, Kelly J., 2022. "Assessing the perception of E-scooters as a practical and equitable first-mile/last-mile solution," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 395-418.
    7. repec:plo:pone00:0196288 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Hauck, Jana & Suess-Reyes, Julia & Beck, Susanne & Prügl, Reinhard & Frank, Hermann, 2016. "Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and -managed firms: A validation and short form of the FIBER Scale," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 133-148.
    9. Sürücü, Lütfi & YIKILMAZ, İbrahim & MASLAKÇI, Ahmet, 2022. "Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) in Quantitative Researches and Practical Considerations," OSF Preprints fgd4e, Center for Open Science.
    10. Francisco J. Conejo & Lawrence F. Cunningham & Clifford E. Young, 2020. "Revisiting the Brand Luxury Index: new empirical evidence and future directions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 108-122, January.
    11. Volker G. Kuppelwieser & Aleksa-Carina Putinas & Marina Bastounis, 2019. "Toward Application and Testing of Measurement Scales and an Example," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(2), pages 326-349, May.
    12. Carlos Miguel Lemos & Ross Joseph Gore & Ivan Puga-Gonzalez & F LeRon Shults, 2019. "Dimensionality and factorial invariance of religiosity among Christians and the religiously unaffiliated: A cross-cultural analysis based on the International Social Survey Programme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-36, May.
    13. Wan Arfan Rusyaidi Wan Abdul Rashid & Farhana Tahmida Newaz & Johari Mat & Azrul Fazwan Kharuddin & Darvinatasya Kharuddin, 2025. "Validating a Multidimensional Instrument for Measuring Key Opinion Leader (KOL) Collaboration Effectiveness in Malaysia's Cosmetic Industry," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(10), pages 4918-4928, October.
    14. Raveenajit Kaur A. P. & Kalvant Singh & Alberto Luis August, 2021. "Exploring the Factor Structure of the Constructs of Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK): An Exploratory Factor Analysis Based on the Perceptions of TESOL Pre-Service Teachers at ," Research Journal of Education, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 7(2), pages 103-115, 06-2021.
    15. Attanasio, Orazio & Blundell, Richard & Conti, Gabriella & Mason, Giacomo, 2020. "Inequality in socio-emotional skills: A cross-cohort comparison," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Andrea Poli & Mario Miccoli, 2023. "Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Unconditional Self-Kindness Scale (USKS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Katharina L Graunke & Gerd Nürnberg & Dirk Repsilber & Birger Puppe & Jan Langbein, 2013. "Describing Temperament in an Ungulate: A Multidimensional Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-1, September.
    18. Utz Weitzel & Diemo Urbig & Sameeksha Desai & Mark Sanders & Zoltán J. Ács, 2015. "The good, the bad, and the talented: Entrepreneurial talent and selfish behavior," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 2, pages 24-41, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Roberto Dell'Anno & Morena De Stefano, 2014. "Un indicatore sintetico dell?Illusione Finanziaria. Un tentativo di stima per l?Italia," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 65-92.
    20. Reithmayer, Corrina & Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, "undated". "Societal attitudes in ovo gender determination as an alternative to chick culling," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 298040, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    21. repec:jss:jstsof:46:i04 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Branden B. Johnson & William K. Hallman & Cara L. Cuite, 2015. "Modeling Retrospective Attribution of Responsibility to Hazard‐Managing Institutions: An Example Involving a Food Contamination Incident," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 423-433, March.
    23. Timothy P Moss & Victoria Lawson & Paul White & The Appearance Research Collaboration, 2014. "Salience and Valence of Appearance in a Population with a Visible Difference of Appearance: Direct and Moderated Relationships with Self-Consciousness, Anxiety and Depression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-8, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9319-:d:1507455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.