IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8992-d1500854.html

An Exploratory Study on the Efficacy and Inclusivity of AI Technologies in Diverse Learning Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Pin-Chuan Lin

    (Faculty of Education, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS B3M 2J6, Canada)

  • Arita Li Liu

    (Center for Educational Excellence, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada)

  • Eric Poitras

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Maiga Chang

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Athabasca University, Athabasca, AB T9S 3A3, Canada
    Multidisciplinary Academic Research Center, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien County 974, Taiwan)

  • Daniel H. Chang

    (Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada)

Abstract

This exploratory research conducted a thematic analysis of students’ experiences and utilization of AI tools by students in educational settings. We surveyed 87 undergraduates from two different educational courses at a comprehensive university in Western Canada. Nine integral themes that represent AI’s role in student learning and key issues with respect to AI have been identified. The study yielded three critical insights: the potential of AI to expand educational access for a diverse student body, the necessity for robust ethical frameworks to govern AI, and the benefits of personalized AI-driven support. Based on the results, a model is proposed along with recommendations for an optimal learning environment, where AI facilitates meaningful learning. We argue that integrating AI tools into learning has the potential to promote inclusivity and accessibility by making learning more accessible to diverse students. We also advocate for a shift in perception among educational stakeholders towards AI, calling for de-stigmatization of its use in education. Overall, our findings suggest that academic institutions should establish clear, empirical guidelines defining student conduct with respect to what is considered appropriate AI use.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Pin-Chuan Lin & Arita Li Liu & Eric Poitras & Maiga Chang & Daniel H. Chang, 2024. "An Exploratory Study on the Efficacy and Inclusivity of AI Technologies in Diverse Learning Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8992-:d:1500854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel H. Chang & Michael Pin-Chuan Lin & Shiva Hajian & Quincy Q. Wang, 2023. "Educational Design Principles of Using AI Chatbot That Supports Self-Regulated Learning in Education: Goal Setting, Feedback, and Personalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Ahmed, Syed Ishtiaque & Smolander, Kari, 2022. "What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Zofia Miluniec & Ireneusz Miciula & Maciej Osmycki, 2025. "Disciplinary Differences in Students’ Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Comparative Mixed-Methods Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1733-1753.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongping Bao & Ludwig Danwitz & Fabian Dvorak & Sebastian Fehrler & Lars Hornuf & Hsuan Yu Lin & Bettina von Helversen, 2022. "Similarity and Consistency in Algorithm-Guided Exploration," CESifo Working Paper Series 10188, CESifo.
    2. Arsenyan, Jbid & Mirowska, Agata & Piepenbrink, Anke, 2023. "Close encounters with the virtual kind: Defining a human-virtual agent coexistence framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Jan René Judek, 2024. "Willingness to Use Algorithms Varies with Social Information on Weak vs. Strong Adoption: An Experimental Study on Algorithm Aversion," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Algharabat, Raed S. & Metri, Bhimaraya & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "Virtual agents and flow experience: An empirical examination of AI-powered chatbots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Chacon, Alvaro & Kausel, Edgar E. & Reyes, Tomas & Trautmann, Stefan, 2025. "Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Chen, Qin & Wang, Hongchuan & Ma, Chengcheng & Ru, Peng, 2025. "How professionals respond to disruptive effects of artificial intelligence on their jurisdiction: The role of interactive governance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
    7. Zehnle, Meike & Hildebrand, Christian & Valenzuela, Ana, 2025. "Not all AI is created equal: A meta-analysis revealing drivers of AI resistance across markets, methods, and time," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 729-751.
    8. Wang, Xun & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez & Demir, Emrah & Sarkis, Joseph, 2024. "Algorithm aversion during disruptions: The case of safety stock," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    9. Scott Schanke & Gordon Burtch & Gautam Ray, 2026. "Digital Lyrebirds: Experimental Evidence That Voice-Based Deep Fakes Influence Trust," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 386-405, January.
    10. Miozza, Mario & Brunetta, Federica & Appio, Francesco Paolo, 2024. "Digital transformation of the Pharmaceutical Industry: A future research agenda for management studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    11. Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel & Michel Tolksdorf, 2025. "Delegating in the Age of AI: Preferences for Decision Autonomy," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 558, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    12. Brüns, Jasper David & Meißner, Martin, 2024. "Do you create your content yourself? Using generative artificial intelligence for social media content creation diminishes perceived brand authenticity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Singu, Hari Babu & Chakraborty, Debarun & Troise, Ciro & Camilleri, Mark Anthony & Bresciani, Stefano, 2026. "Responsible AI for trustworthy tourism: A framework for mitigating ambiguity and anxiety with generative AI," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    14. Alexia GAUDEUL & Caterina GIANNETTI, 2023. "Trade-offs in the design of financial algorithms," Discussion Papers 2023/288, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    15. Zulia Gubaydullina & Jan René Judek & Marco Lorenz & Markus Spiwoks, 2022. "Comparing Different Kinds of Influence on an Algorithm in Its Forecasting Process and Their Impact on Algorithm Aversion," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Manav Raj & Justin Berg & Rob Seamans, 2023. "Art-ificial Intelligence: The Effect of AI Disclosure on Evaluations of Creative Content," Papers 2303.06217, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    17. Jonas Wanner & Lukas-Valentin Herm & Kai Heinrich & Christian Janiesch, 2022. "The effect of transparency and trust on intelligent system acceptance: Evidence from a user-based study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2079-2102, December.
    18. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mitra, Ranjan Kumar, 2023. "What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Klockmann, Victor & von Schenk, Alicia & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2025. "Artificial intelligence, distributional fairness, and pivotality," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    20. Zhang, Ying & Tavalaei, M. Mahdi & Parry, Glenn & Zhou, Peng, 2024. "Evolution or involution? A systematic literature review of organisations' blockchain adoption factors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8992-:d:1500854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.