IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8970-d1500232.html

Factors Affecting the Sustainability of Corporates in Polluting Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Raminta Vaitiekuniene

    (Department of Mathematical Modeling, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu 50, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania
    School of Economics and Business, Kaunas University of Technology, Gedimino 50, 44239 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Kristina Sutiene

    (Department of Mathematical Modeling, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu 50, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Rytis Krusinskas

    (School of Economics and Business, Kaunas University of Technology, Gedimino 50, 44239 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

Corporate sustainability performance is gaining ever greater importance. The negative impact of climate change is manifested through heavy air, water and soil pollution. Polluting sectors, as the major players, are characterized by large amounts of emissions, waste and consumption of resources, and therefore have a larger negative impact on the environment. Companies operating in polluting sectors are recognized globally as the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions; thus, their performance is widely debated. Despite their character, such companies strive for higher profitability, better financial performance and operational efficiency. However, higher financial resources create the potential for innovation investments in companies. It is widely accepted that research and experimental development (R&D) expenditures enable new business ideas, models, products, services, and processes. However, while pursuing sustainability targets, financial results could be directed towards sustainability performance. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how the financial and innovation results of companies in polluting sectors interact with sustainability performance scores. For it, we have identified three essential pillars of sustainability: environmental, governance, and social. Using ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions, models were developed for each pillar of sustainability, including corporate financial performance indicators and R&D expenditures. The obtained results provide the insights that a company operating in polluting sector size and turnover significantly interacts with all pillars of sustainability. However, we also found that the corporate debt ratio, earnings ratio, and current liquidity have a significant relation only with environmental and social sustainability indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Raminta Vaitiekuniene & Kristina Sutiene & Rytis Krusinskas, 2024. "Factors Affecting the Sustainability of Corporates in Polluting Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8970-:d:1500232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8970/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8970/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoje Jo & Maretno Harjoto, 2011. "Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 351-383, October.
    2. Yang, Xiangyang & Li, Zijun & Qiu, Zhaoxuan & Wang, Jinmin & Liu, Bei, 2024. "ESG performance and corporate technology innovation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    3. Cheng, Shi & Huang, Shan, 2024. "ESG combined score effects on stock performance of S&P 500-listed firms," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Mergoni, Anna & Dipierro, Anna Rita & Colamartino, Chiara, 2024. "European agricultural sector: The tortuous path across efficiency, sustainability and environmental risk," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Saeed, Asif & Noor, Mah & Soobaroyen, Teerooven & Gull, Ammar Ali, 2024. "Investigating the varying relevance of CSR dimensions on firm leverage: The implications for internationalized firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Sun, Zhennan & Du, Qunyang & Du, Anna Min & Li, Zhongyuan & Yang, Tianle, 2024. "The information environment and ecological environment perspectives: Capital market openness and firm ESG rating divergence," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. DeBoskey, D.G. & Luo, Yan & Wang, Jeff J., 2018. "Do specialized board committees impact the transparency of corporate political disclosure? Evidence from S&P 500 companies," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 8-19.
    8. Liu, Simeng & Wang, Kun Tracy & Walpola, Sonali & Zhu, Nathan Zhenghang, 2024. "CSR contracting and stock price crash risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Li Wang & Hongyu Yang, 2024. "Digital technology innovation and corporate ESG performance: evidence from China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 1-32, December.
    10. Luo, Runmei & Ye, Yong, 2024. "Do firms listen to the ESG voices of minority investors? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    11. Li, Xiaolong & Ozturk, Ilhan & Ullah, Sana & Andlib, Zubaria & Hafeez, Muhammad, 2022. "Can top-pollutant economies shift some burden through insurance sector development for sustainable development?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 326-336.
    12. Khaddage-Soboh, Nada & Yunis, Manal & Imran, Muhammad & Zeb, Faheem, 2024. "Sustainable practices in Malaysian manufacturing: The influence of CSR, transformational leadership, and green organizational culture on environmental performance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 753-768.
    13. Li, Chen & Liu, Zhao & Song, Rong & Zhang, Yue-Jun, 2024. "The impact of green credit guidelines on environmental performance: Firm-level evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Shaorong & Xiong, Ruoyu & Peng, Huan & Tang, Shiyu, 2025. "ESG performance and private enterprise resilience: Evidence from Chinese financial markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Shen, Lin & Zhang, Wen & Ma, Dan, 2025. "ESG practices and financing constraints of Chinese high-carbon enterprises under carbon reduction pressure: The role of credit financing and corporate reputation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Han, Yihan & Pang, Silu & Jiang, Fuxin & Wang, Tao, 2025. "Does “Made in China (2025)” improve innovation quality in robotics? Evidence from PageRank-based patent network," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Cuicui Huang, 2025. "Digital transformation and corporate ESG performance: Research based on a capability-motivation dual framework," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Chen, Yuhang & Zhong, Yilin & Xu, Feng & Zhang, Qinghua, 2025. "Driving environmental, social, and governance excellence: The direct and indirect effects of intelligent transformation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 313-331.
    6. Anzhu Xue & Guang Yang & Hui Wang, 2025. "The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) on the Green Development of Listed Companies in China’s Agricultural and Forestry Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Wen, Bohui & You, Wei & Yuan, Ming, 2025. "The Impact of commercial banks' ESG performance: Difference between provocative and passive risk-taking – Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Cao, Hengshan, 2025. "Technological innovation capability, marketing input intensity and stock price crash risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    9. Xu, Chang & Hu, Jianguang & Li, Lu, 2025. "Functional industrial policy effects of the Belt and Road Initiative: evidence from digital innovation," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3).
    10. Gao, Xiang & He, Xixi & Sun, Chuanwang & Wu, Dongmei & Zhang, Jie, 2025. "Innovation in shouldering green responsibility: ESG performance and green technology innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    11. Yichun Zhang & Xinyi Zhang, 2025. "Analysis of the Influence Mechanism of Digital Transformation on the New Quality Productivity of Enterprises --The Mediating Role of Financing Constraints and ESG Ratings," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Raphael Boahen Adomako & Prince Brefo Boakye & Andrews Salapki, 2025. "Tech-driven governance for sustainability: enhancing environmental disclosure through corporate governance and innovation in emerging market," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(7), pages 1-34, July.
    13. Jing, Li & Qianqiang, Li & Yantai, Chen & Qi, An, 2025. "How digital transformation facilitates ESG performance to heavy polluting enterprises:A panel fsQCA based on national big data comprehensive pilot zones," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Xuejia Zheng & Lei Zhuang, 2025. "The Impact of Environmental Protection Tax on Green Behaviors and ESG Performance of Industrial Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Lei, Xiao & Tu, Qin, 2025. "ESG performance and innovation in listed manufacturing companies–A prospect theory perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    16. Yu Sang & Kannan Loganathan & Priya Sukirthanandan, 2025. "A Study on the Impact of Corporate Digital Transformation on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance: Mechanism Analysis Based on Resource Allocation Efficiency and Technological Gap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-31, April.
    17. Yuan Li & Yongchun Huang & Yupeng Zhao & Zi Ye, 2025. "The Impact of Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on Total Factor Productivity: An Analysis of the Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Jiang, Lisha & Zhou, Wei & Hualiang, Wu & Deng, Wei, 2025. "Impact of business environment uncertainty on ESG performance from the perspective of resource supply and demand based on ESG performance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1012-1030.
    19. Shen, Ling & Yang, Xiaozhong & Ma, Guangcheng, 2025. "Can companies’ participation in ESG ratings improve green innovation efficiency? Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Cai, Yongyi & Xiao, Xuefen & Hu, Yanmei, 2025. "ESG initiatives and investment efficiency in energy industries: The moderating role of regulation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8970-:d:1500232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.