IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8647-d1493245.html

Selection of Green Recycling Suppliers for Shared Electric Bikes: A Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Method Based on the Basic Uncertain Information Generalized Power Weighted Average Operator and Basic Uncertain Information-Based Best–Middle–Worst TOPSIS Model

Author

Listed:
  • Limei Liu

    (School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)

  • Fei Shao

    (School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)

  • Chen He

    (School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)

Abstract

This study introduces a novel multi-criteria group evaluation approach grounded in the theory of basic uncertain information (BUI) to facilitate the selection of green recycling suppliers for shared electric bikes. Firstly, a comprehensive index system of green recycling suppliers is established, encompassing recycling capacity, environmental sustainability, financial strength, maintenance capabilities, and policy support, to provide a solid foundation for the scientific selection process. Secondly, the basic uncertain information generalized power weighted average (BUIGPWA) operator is proposed to aggregate group evaluation information with BUI pairs, and some related properties are investigated. Furthermore, the basic uncertain information-based best–middle–worst TOPSIS (BUI-BMW-TOPSIS) model incorporating the best, middle, and worst reference points to enhance decision-making accuracy is proposed. Ultimately, by integrating the BUIGPWA operator for group information aggregation with the BUI-BMW-TOPSIS model to handle multi-criteria decision information, a novel multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) method is constructed to evaluate green recycling suppliers for shared electric bikes. Case analyses and comparative analyses demonstrate that compared with the BUIWA operator, the BUIGPWA operator yields more reliable results because of its consideration of the degree of support among decision-makers. Furthermore, in contrast to the traditional TOPSIS method, the BUI-BMW-TOPSIS model incorporates the credibility of information provided by decision-makers, leading to more trustworthy outcomes. Notably, variations in attribute weights significantly impact the decision-making results. In summary, our methods excel in handling uncertain information and complex multi-criteria group decisions, boosting scientific rigor and reliability, and supporting optimization and sustainability of shared electric bike green recycling suppliers.

Suggested Citation

  • Limei Liu & Fei Shao & Chen He, 2024. "Selection of Green Recycling Suppliers for Shared Electric Bikes: A Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Method Based on the Basic Uncertain Information Generalized Power Weighted Average Operator and Basic Uncertain Information-Based Best–Middle–Wor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8647-:d:1493245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8647/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8647/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maren Schnieder, 2023. "Ebike Sharing vs. Bike Sharing: Demand Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks and Random Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Li, Qiumeng & Fuerst, Franz & Luca, Davide, 2023. "Do shared E-bikes reduce urban carbon emissions?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi & Hadi Badri Ahmadi & Himanshu Gupta & James J. H. Liou, 2023. "Supplier selection to support environmental sustainability: the stratified BWM TOPSIS method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 321-344, March.
    4. Limei Liu & Zhe Liu & Yi Yang & Biao Shi & Xingbao Liu, 2023. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Abandoned-Bike-Sharing Recycling: Impact of Recycling Subsidy Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nitin Sahu & Garima Mittal, 2026. "Resilient supplier selection under operational and disruption risks: A multi-stage framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(3), pages 2617-2654, April.
    2. Aobdia, Daniel & Köchling, Gerrit & Limbach, Peter & Yoon, Aaron, 2025. "Emissions restatements after the SEC's request for public input on climate-related disclosures: Evidence from carbon disclosure project filings," CFR Working Papers 25-11, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    3. Dhulfiqar Hakeem Dhayef & Sawsan S. A. Al-Zubaidi & Luma A. H. Al-Kindi & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2026. "Similarity coefficient and TOPSIS methods for designing flexible machine cell layout: a case study of electrical and electronic industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 358(2), pages 615-644, March.
    4. Mohiuddin, Hossain & Bunch, David S. & Fukushige, Tatsuya & Fitch-Polse, Dillon T. & Handy, Susan L., 2025. "What factors influence the adoption and use of dockless electric bike-share? A case study from the Sacramento region," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Allison McCurdy & Elizabeth E. Perry & Jessica E. Leahy & Kimberly J. Coleman & Joshua Doyle & Lydia A. Kiewra & Shelby A. Marocco & Tatiana A. Iretskaia & Madison M. Janes & Mikael Deliyski, 2024. "Gaining Traction on Social Aspects of E-Biking: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Shen, Yongchang & Ma, Jinglong & Chen, Xue-Li & Wang, Yihong & Song, Malin, 2026. "Uncovering carbon reduction Potential: How does consumption structure upgrading influence household carbon emissions? Evidence from CFPS microdata," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 209(PB).
    7. G. Reza Nasiri & Elnaz Miandoabchi & Mohaddeseh Javadi, 2025. "Developing a Two-Stage Decision-Making Method for Selecting and Clustering Suppliers Based on the Resilience Criteria," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 7-34, February.
    8. Ren, Jian & Ye, Ke Ting & Li, Fei Yan & Chen, Shuang, 2025. "Information aggregation and psychological risk dual-driven venture capital decision: A decision model based on extended fuzzy sets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PD).
    9. Gabriel Koman & Dominika Toman & Radoslav Jankal & Silvia Krúpová, 2024. "Public Transport Infrastructure with Electromobility Elements at the Smart City Level to Support Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Mohammad Kanan & Ansa Rida Dilshad & Sadaf Zahoor & Amjad Hussain & Muhammad Salman Habib & Amjad Mehmood & Zaher Abusaq & Allam Hamdan & Jihad Asad, 2023. "An Empirical Study of the Implementation of an Integrated Ergo-Green-Lean Framework: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Zhang, Yongping & Fu, Wenyan & Yan, Jiaxin & Chao, Hao & Kong, Hui, 2025. "The effect of dockless e-bike-sharing on reducing carbon emissions: A dynamic investigation of two small Chinese cities between 2020 and 2022," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    12. Yang, Ying & Zhan, Jiahao & Xu, Mujian & Liu, Yang & Qu, Xiaobo, 2026. "Toward climate-neutral urban mobility: understanding shared e-scooter carbon emission patterns through multi-city evidence in Europe," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Ken Polin & Tan Yigitcanlar & Tracy Washington & Mark Limb, 2024. "Unpacking Smart Campus Assessment: Developing a Framework via Narrative Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Mohammed Alghassab, 2023. "A Computational Case Study on Sustainable Energy Transition in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Li, Yanlin & Tsang, Y.P. & Lee, C.K.M. & Zhang, Qintian & Chen, Zhen-Song, 2025. "Service area identification for robotaxi deployment: A GIS-based spatio-temporal multi-criteria decision support framework," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 497-512.
    16. Shi, Lin & Jiang, Yiliang & Chen, Faan & Zhu, Kaiyi & Nielsen, Chris P. & Wang, Yuejiao & Tian, Fang & Wu, Jiaorong & Chen, Xiaohong, 2025. "Built environment, car ownership and PM2.5: Stronger causal estimates from a quasi-experiment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Arıöz, Yağmur & Yılmaz, İbrahim & Yıldızbaşı, Abdullah, 2025. "Unlocking circularity: A stakeholder theory approach to the 10Rs in the solar PV supply chain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    18. Cailou Jiang & Yue Zhang, 2023. "Does Extended Producer Responsibility System Promote Green Technological Innovation in China’s Power Battery Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Shouheng Sun & Yiran Wang & Dafei Yang & Qi Wu, 2025. "How Does Sharing Economy Advance Sustainable Production and Consumption? Evidence from the Policies and Business Practices of Dockless Bike Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-29, August.
    20. Seyed Hamid Hashemi Petrudi & Hadi Badri Ahmadi & Yasaman Azareh & James J. H. Liou, 2024. "Developing a structural model for supply chain viability: a case from a developing country," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 324-339, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8647-:d:1493245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.