IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13898-d1242826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ebike Sharing vs. Bike Sharing: Demand Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks and Random Forests

Author

Listed:
  • Maren Schnieder

    (Faculty of Business and Law, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK)

Abstract

Background: Conventional bike sharing systems are frequently adding electric bicycles. A major question now arises: Does the bike sharing system have a sufficient number of ebikes available, and are there customers who prefer to use an ebike even though none are available? Methods: Trip data from three different bike sharing systems (Indego in Philadelphia, Santander Cycles in London, and Metro in Los Angeles and Austin) have been used in this study. To determine if an ebike was available at the station when a customer departed, an algorithm was created. Using only those trips that departed while an ebike was available, a random forest classifier and deep neural network classifier were used to predict whether the trip was completed with an ebike or not. These models were used to predict the potential demand for ebikes at times when no ebikes were available. Results: For the system with the highest prediction accuracy, Santander Cycles in London, between 21% and 27% of the trips were predicted to have used an ebike if one had been available. The most important features were temperature, distance, wind speed, and altitude difference. Conclusion: The prediction methods can help bike sharing operators to estimate the current demand for ebikes.

Suggested Citation

  • Maren Schnieder, 2023. "Ebike Sharing vs. Bike Sharing: Demand Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks and Random Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13898-:d:1242826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13898/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13898/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frauke Behrendt & Sally Cairns & David Raffo & Ian Philips, 2021. "Impact of E-Bikes on Cycling in Hilly Areas: Participants’ Experience of Electrically-Assisted Cycling in a UK Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Charles R. Harris & K. Jarrod Millman & Stéfan J. Walt & Ralf Gommers & Pauli Virtanen & David Cournapeau & Eric Wieser & Julian Taylor & Sebastian Berg & Nathaniel J. Smith & Robert Kern & Matti Picu, 2020. "Array programming with NumPy," Nature, Nature, vol. 585(7825), pages 357-362, September.
    3. Stefania Boglietti & Benedetto Barabino & Giulio Maternini, 2021. "Survey on e-Powered Micro Personal Mobility Vehicles: Exploring Current Issues towards Future Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-34, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan Wang & L. Jeff Hong, 2023. "Large-Scale Inventory Optimization: A Recurrent Neural Networks–Inspired Simulation Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 196-215, January.
    2. Léon Faure & Bastien Mollet & Wolfram Liebermeister & Jean-Loup Faulon, 2023. "A neural-mechanistic hybrid approach improving the predictive power of genome-scale metabolic models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Claudia Quinteros-Cartaya & Guillermo Solorio-Magaña & Francisco Javier Núñez-Cornú & Felipe de Jesús Escalona-Alcázar & Diana Núñez, 2023. "Microearthquakes in the Guadalajara Metropolitan Zone, Mexico: evidence from buried active faults in Tesistán Valley, Zapopan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 2797-2818, April.
    4. López Pérez, Mario & Mansilla Corona, Ricardo, 2022. "Ordinal synchronization and typical states in high-frequency digital markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 598(C).
    5. Jessica M. Vanslambrouck & Sean B. Wilson & Ker Sin Tan & Ella Groenewegen & Rajeev Rudraraju & Jessica Neil & Kynan T. Lawlor & Sophia Mah & Michelle Scurr & Sara E. Howden & Kanta Subbarao & Melissa, 2022. "Enhanced metanephric specification to functional proximal tubule enables toxicity screening and infectious disease modelling in kidney organoids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Kiran Krishnamachari & Dylan Lu & Alexander Swift-Scott & Anuar Yeraliyev & Kayla Lee & Weitai Huang & Sim Ngak Leng & Anders Jacobsen Skanderup, 2022. "Accurate somatic variant detection using weakly supervised deep learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Felix Schwinger & Baran Tanriverdi & Matthias Jarke, 2022. "Comparing Micromobility with Public Transportation Trips in a Data-Driven Spatio-Temporal Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Lauren L. Porter & Allen K. Kim & Swechha Rimal & Loren L. Looger & Ananya Majumdar & Brett D. Mensh & Mary R. Starich & Marie-Paule Strub, 2022. "Many dissimilar NusG protein domains switch between α-helix and β-sheet folds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Matthew Rosenblatt & Link Tejavibulya & Rongtao Jiang & Stephanie Noble & Dustin Scheinost, 2024. "Data leakage inflates prediction performance in connectome-based machine learning models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Jackie Grant & Mark Hindmarsh & Sergey E. Koposov, 2022. "The distribution of loss to future USS pensions due to the UUK cuts of April 2022," Papers 2206.06201, arXiv.org.
    11. Sayedali Shetab Boushehri & Katharina Essig & Nikolaos-Kosmas Chlis & Sylvia Herter & Marina Bacac & Fabian J. Theis & Elke Glasmacher & Carsten Marr & Fabian Schmich, 2023. "Explainable machine learning for profiling the immunological synapse and functional characterization of therapeutic antibodies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Shukla, Mohak & Thakur, Ajay D., 2022. "An Enquiry on similarities between Renormalization Group and Auto-Encoders using Transfer Learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P1).
    13. Duc Nguyen Huu & Van Nguyen Ngoc, 2021. "Analysis Study of Current Transportation Status in Vietnam’s Urban Traffic and the Transition to Electric Two-Wheelers Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Draženko Glavić & Ana Trpković & Marina Milenković & Sreten Jevremović, 2021. "The E-Scooter Potential to Change Urban Mobility—Belgrade Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.
    15. Khaled Akkad & David He, 2023. "A dynamic mode decomposition based deep learning technique for prognostics," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2207-2224, June.
    16. Romain Fournier & Zoi Tsangalidou & David Reich & Pier Francesco Palamara, 2023. "Haplotype-based inference of recent effective population size in modern and ancient DNA samples," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Tiziana Campisi & Anastasios Skoufas & Alexandros Kaltsidis & Socrates Basbas, 2021. "Gender Equality and E-Scooters: Mind the Gap! A Statistical Analysis of the Sicily Region, Italy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    18. Laura Portell & Sergi Morera & Helena Ramalhinho, 2022. "Door-to-Door Transportation Services for Reduced Mobility Population: A Descriptive Analytics of the City of Barcelona," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Caroline Haimerl & Douglas A. Ruff & Marlene R. Cohen & Cristina Savin & Eero P. Simoncelli, 2023. "Targeted V1 comodulation supports task-adaptive sensory decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Jonas Bunsen & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2022. "An Introductory Review of Input-Output Analysis in Sustainability Sciences Including Potential Implications of Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13898-:d:1242826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.