IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p7053-d1716939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Sharing Economy Advance Sustainable Production and Consumption? Evidence from the Policies and Business Practices of Dockless Bike Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Shouheng Sun

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yiran Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Dafei Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102617, China
    Research Center of Beijing Modern Industrial Development District, Beijing 102617, China)

  • Qi Wu

    (School of Finance, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China)

Abstract

The sharing economy is considered to be a potentially efficacious approach for promoting sustainable production and consumption (SPC). This study utilizes dockless bike sharing (DBS) in Beijing as a case study to examine how sharing economy policies and business practices advance SPC. It also dynamically quantifies the environmental and economic performance of DBS practices from a life cycle perspective. The findings indicate that effective SPC practices can be achieved through the collaborative efforts of multiple stakeholders, including the government, operators, manufacturers, consumers, recycling agencies, and other business partners, supported by regulatory systems and advanced technologies. The SPC practices markedly improved the sustainability of DBS promotion in Beijing. This is evidenced by the increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction benefits, which have risen from approximately 35.81 g CO 2 -eq to 124.40 g CO 2 -eq per kilometer of DBS travel. Considering changes in private bicycle ownership, this value could reach approximately 150.60 g CO 2 -eq. Although the economic performance of DBS operators has also improved, it remains challenging to achieve profitability, even when considering the economic value of the emission reduction benefits. In certain scenarios, DBS can maximize profits by optimizing fleet size and efficiency, without compromising the benefits of emission reductions. The framework of stakeholder interaction proposed in this study and the results of empirical analysis not only assist regulators, businesses, and the public in better understanding and promoting sustainable production and consumption practices in the sharing economy but also provide valuable insights for achieving a win-win situation of platform profitability and environmental benefits in the SPC practice process.

Suggested Citation

  • Shouheng Sun & Yiran Wang & Dafei Yang & Qi Wu, 2025. "How Does Sharing Economy Advance Sustainable Production and Consumption? Evidence from the Policies and Business Practices of Dockless Bike Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-29, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7053-:d:1716939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7053/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7053/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ye, Fei & Ni, Debing & Li, Kevin W., 2021. "Competition between manufacturers and sharing economy platforms: An owner base and sharing utility perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Shouheng Sun, 2021. "How Does the Collaborative Economy Advance Better Product Lifetimes? A Case Study of Free-Floating Bike Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Dirk Schneckenberg & Steffen Roth & Vivek Velamuri, 2023. "Deparadoxification and value focus in sharing ventures: Concealing paradoxes in strategic decision-making," Post-Print hal-04056130, HAL.
    4. Langshaw, Liam & Ainalis, Daniel & Acha, Salvador & Shah, Nilay & Stettler, Marc E.J., 2020. "Environmental and economic analysis of liquefied natural gas (LNG) for heavy goods vehicles in the UK: A Well-to-Wheel and total cost of ownership evaluation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Limei Liu & Zhe Liu & Yi Yang & Biao Shi & Xingbao Liu, 2023. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Abandoned-Bike-Sharing Recycling: Impact of Recycling Subsidy Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Zhenfeng Liu & Ya Xiao & Jian Feng, 2021. "Manufacturer’s Sharing Servitization Transformation and Product Pricing Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Sun, Qingqing & Chen, Hong & Long, Ruyin & Yang, Jiahui, 2023. "Who will pay for the “bicycle cemetery”? Evolutionary game analysis of recycling abandoned shared bicycles under dynamic reward and punishment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 917-929.
    8. Yuchen Gao & Jingrui Chen, 2019. "The Risk Reduction and Sustainable Development of Shared Transportation: The Chinese Online Car-hailing Policy Evaluation in the Digitalization Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, May.
    9. João Filipe Teixeira & Cecília Silva & Frederico Moura e Sá, 2021. "Empirical evidence on the impacts of bikesharing: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 329-351, May.
    10. Andrei Boar & Ramon Bastida & Frederic Marimon, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review. Relationships between the Sharing Economy, Sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Hui Li & Kannan Srinivasan, 2019. "Competitive Dynamics in the Sharing Economy: An Analysis in the Context of Airbnb and Hotels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 365-391, May.
    12. Schneckenberg, Dirk & Roth, Steffen & Velamuri, Vivek K., 2023. "Deparadoxification and value focus in sharing ventures: Concealing paradoxes in strategic decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. Huiqi Guan & Xin Geng & Haresh Gurnani, 2023. "Peer‐to‐peer sharing platforms with quality differentiation: Manufacturer's strategic decision under sharing economy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(2), pages 485-500, February.
    14. Chambers, Peter, 2020. "O Bike in Melbourne: A plea for more scepticism about disruption and capital, based on what we can know about one dockless bike scheme," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 72-80.
    15. Giovannipaolo Ferrari & Yingxin Tan & Paolo Diana & Maria Palazzo, 2024. "The Platformisation of Cycling—The Development of Bicycle-Sharing Systems in China: Innovation, Urban and Social Regeneration and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Zhao, De & Ong, Ghim Ping & Wang, Wei & Hu, Xiao Jian, 2019. "Effect of built environment on shared bicycle reallocation: A case study on Nanjing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 73-88.
    17. Kailai Wang & Xiaodong Qian & Dillon Taylor Fitch & Yongsung Lee & Jai Malik & Giovanni Circella, 2023. "What travel modes do shared e-scooters displace? A review of recent research findings," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 5-31, January.
    18. Laa, Barbara & Emberger, Günter, 2020. "Bike sharing: Regulatory options for conflicting interests – Case study Vienna," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 148-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Wang & Liang Yan & Fangli Ruan, 2022. "A Combined IO-DEMATEL Analysis for Evaluating Sustainable Effects of the Sharing Related Industries Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Yongfei Li & Jiangtao Wang & Bin Wang & Clark Luo, 2024. "A Study of Quantum Game for Low-Carbon Transportation with Government Subsidies and Penalties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Sayem Ahmed & Tazim Ahmed & Humaira Nafisa Ahmed & Syed Mithun Ali & Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez & Golam Kabir, 2025. "Modeling the nexus of data analytics, sustainability practices and quality management: Evidence of key enablers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 881-908, January.
    4. Dan Wang & Liang Yan & Fangli Ruan & Xiaohuang Zeng, 2022. "An Abductive Analysis of Debates on the Impact of the Sharing Economy: A Systematic Review in a Sustainable Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Teixeira, João Filipe & Silva, Cecília & Moura e Sá, Frederico, 2023. "Factors influencing modal shift to bike sharing: Evidence from a travel survey conducted during COVID-19," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    6. Pablo Luque & Daniel A. Mántaras & Luciano Sanchez, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence Applied to Evaluate Emissions and Energy Consumption in Commuter Railways: Comparison of Liquefied Natural Gas as an Alternative Fuel to Diesel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Wang, Yingjia & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Luo, Suyuan, 2024. "Sustainability versus exclusivity in the sharing economy: Should leftover luxury fashion products be destroyed?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Szilvia Molnár & László Szőllősi, 2020. "Sustainability and Quality Aspects of Different Table Egg Production Systems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Hui Li & Yijin Kim & Kannan Srinivasan, 2022. "Market Shifts in the Sharing Economy: The Impact of Airbnb on Housing Rentals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8015-8044, November.
    10. Pablo Pérez-Gosende & Josefa Mula & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero, 2020. "Overview of Dynamic Facility Layout Planning as a Sustainability Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Wei Chen & Karen Xie & Jianwei Liu & Yong Liu, 2019. "How Incumbents Beat Disruptors? Evidence from Hotels’ Responses to Home-sharing Rivals," Working Papers 19-11, NET Institute.
    12. Slavin Viktor & Shuba Yevheniy & Caban Jacek & Matijosius Jonas & Rimkus Alfredas & Korpach Anatolii & Gutarevych Serhiy, 2022. "The Performance of a Car with Various Engine Power Systems – Part II," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 141-151, January.
    13. Rosario Silva & Oksana Gerwe, 2024. "Micro Entry Theory: Understanding the Drivers and Effects of the Entry of Micro Players in the Context of Digital Platforms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(6), pages 2633-2661, September.
    14. Ji, Shujuan & Liu, Xiaojie & Wang, Yuanqing, 2024. "The role of road infrastructures in the usage of bikeshare and private bicycle," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 234-246.
    15. Bai, Jiaru & Tang, Christopher S., 2022. "Can two competing on-demand service platforms be profitable?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    16. John Wiredu & Qian Yang & Agyemang Kwasi Sampene & Bright Akwasi Gyamfi & Simplice A. Asongu, 2024. "The effect of green supply chain management practices on corporate environmental performance: Does supply chain competitive advantage matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2578-2599, March.
    17. Cindy Helinski & Gerhard Schewe, 2022. "The Influence of Consumer Preferences and Perceived Benefits in the Context of B2C Fashion Renting Intentions of Young Women," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Yiling Deng & Pengjun Zhao, 2023. "The determinants of shared bike use in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Handy, Susan L. & Volker, Jamey M. B., 2025. "Assessment of Options for Quantifying Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) from Mitigation Measures," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt29r3h971, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    20. Zhicheng Weng & Pinliang Luo, 2021. "Supervision of the Default Risk of Online Car-Hailing Platform from an Evolutionary Game Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7053-:d:1716939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.