IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8531-d1490005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Analysis and Temporal Governance of Safety Risks: Evidence from Underground Construction Accident Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Xiuyu Wu

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China)

  • Pengkai Sun

    (School of Business, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract

Due to the complexity and dynamics of underground construction projects, safety risk management has experienced significant challenges restricting the sustainable development of underground space. The research on risk causal chains and risk coupling has yet to reveal the dynamic interactive characteristics of these risk factors and their temporal relationships over time. This study utilized a complex system view for safety risk analysis, using 37 accident investigation reports of underground construction projects. Combined with two novel and emerging analytical methods, temporal qualitative comparative analysis and crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis, this study discusses the temporal relationship of risk factors to the cause of accidents and explores the multi-actor coupling characteristics of management risk. The findings indicate that (1) compared with general construction projects, underground construction should pay more attention to management safety risks because they have an obvious time lag effect expressed in all accident causation paths, namely, preceding management risk, management risk, and machine/material risk cross-concurrently, and management risk initiation and (2) underground construction project management risks have three key main paths, namely, single-actor-dominated management deficiency (supervisors, owners, and subcontractors that cause management risks as a single-core actor) and dual-actor-dominated management deficiency (owner and subcontractor as dual core actors of management risk). Multi-actor-dominated management deficiency (owners, subcontractors, and supervisors are the multiple core actors of management risk). This study thus developed a temporal governance framework of underground construction safety risks based on the synergy of multi-actors and proposed risk governance strategies, such as synergistic multi-actor governance, to consider the temporal relationship of safety risk. This study further reveals the temporal and coupling characteristics of safety risks to enrich the risk casual chain theory and risk coupling theory and establish a systematic risk analysis framework for new guidance for safety and risk management for underground construction projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiuyu Wu & Pengkai Sun, 2024. "Dynamic Analysis and Temporal Governance of Safety Risks: Evidence from Underground Construction Accident Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8531-:d:1490005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rui Cheng & Jiaming Wang & Pin-Chao Liao, 2021. "Temporal Visual Patterns of Construction Hazard Recognition Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Dul, Jan, 2016. "Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1516-1523.
    3. Zhiqiang Xie & Fengshan Jiang & Jiarui Xu & Zhengang Zhai & Jianglong He & Daoyang Zheng & Junyu Lian & Zhiqun Hou & Lei Zhao & Yanxia Wang & Yuyun Feng, 2023. "A Narrative of Urban Underground Pipeline System Disasters in China in 2021: Spatial and Temporal Distribution, Causal Analysis, and Response Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Antoine J.‐P. Tixier & Matthew R. Hallowell & Balaji Rajagopalan, 2017. "Construction Safety Risk Modeling and Simulation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1917-1935, October.
    5. Qiao, Wanguan, 2021. "Analysis and measurement of multifactor risk in underground coal mine accidents based on coupling theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    6. Feng Xiong & Yaxin Shao & Haotian Fan & Yi Xie, 2023. "Analysis of the Motivation behind Corporate Social Responsibility Based on the csQCA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Issam Laguir & Rebecca Stekelorum & Lamia Laguir & Raffaele Staglianò, 2021. "Managing corporate social responsibility in the bank sector: A fuzzy and disaggregated approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1324-1334, July.
    2. Bhardwaj, U. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Casualty analysis methodology and taxonomy for FPSO accident analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    3. Szerb, László & Komlósi, Éva, 2025. "A hazai kis- és középvállalkozások növekedési konfigurációi [Growth configurations among Hungarian SMEs]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 842-874.
    4. Baihui Jin & Wei Li, 2023. "External Factors Impacting Residents’ Participation in Waste Sorting Using NCA and fsQCA Methods on Pilot Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Liang, Xiaoning & Frösén, Johanna, 2020. "Examining the link between marketing controls and firm performance: The mediating effect of market-focused learning capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 545-556.
    6. Anh Thi Nguyen & Alrence S. Halibas & Robert McClelland & Nguyen Hoang Thuan, 2024. "Configurational analysis of conditions influencing customers’ channel switching intention in omnichannel retailing: a fuzzy-set analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 141-178, February.
    7. Kosmidou, Vasiliki & Holt, Daniel T., 2022. "The relationship between family management and performance: A configurational approach in exploring the role of socioemotional wealth and generational stage," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    8. Mousavi, Milad & Shen, Xuesong & Zhang, Zhigang & Barati, Khalegh & Li, Binghao, 2025. "IoT-Bayes fusion: Advancing real-time environmental safety risk monitoring in underground mining and construction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    9. Villani, Elisa & Linder, Christian & Lechner, Christian & Muller, Lina, 2021. "How do non-innovative firms start innovation and build legitimacy? The case of professional service firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 614-625.
    10. Chuanming Sun & Guoxin Tan & Xingyu Chai & Haiqing Zhang, 2023. "Analysis on the Satisfaction of Public Cultural Service by Township Residents: A Qualitative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Liu, Chengfei & Wang, Enyuan & Li, Zhonghui & Zang, Zesheng & Li, Baolin & Yin, Shan & Zhang, Chaolin & Liu, Yubing & Wang, Jinxin, 2025. "Research on multi-factor adaptive integrated early warning method for coal mine disaster risks based on multi-task learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    12. Olya, Hossein G.T. & Al-ansi, Amr, 2018. "Risk assessment of halal products and services: Implication for tourism industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 279-291.
    13. Jingyan Liu & Yiyan Yang, 2023. "Improving high‐tech enterprises' new product development performance through digital transformation: A configurational analysis based on fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 3878-3892, October.
    14. Houssein Ballouk & Sami Ben Jabeur & Sabri Boubaker & Salma Mefteh-Wali, 2024. "The effect of social media on bank performance: an fsQCA approach," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 477-495, March.
    15. Padma Charan Mishra & Rashmi Ranjan Panigrahi & Avinash K. Shrivastava, 2024. "Geo-environmental factors’ influence on mining operation: an indirect effect of managerial factors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 14639-14663, June.
    16. Ayten Yagmur & Sergen Gürsoy & Ilhan Gunbayı, 2024. "Mixed-methods analysis of multidimensional conditions for the Human Development Index: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (FsQCA) study," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 26(1), pages 214-234, April.
    17. Drăgan, George Bogdan & Ben Arfi, Wissal & Tiberius, Victor & Ammari, Aymen & Khvatova, Tatiana, 2025. "Navigating the green wave: Understanding behavioral antecedents of sustainable cryptocurrency investment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    18. René Vásquez-Ordóñez, Luis & Lassala, Carlos & Ulrich, Klaus & Ribeiro-Navarrete, Samuel, 2023. "Efficiency factors in the financing of renewable energy projects through crowdlending," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    19. Almenar-Llongo, Vicent & Muñoz de Prat, Javier & Orero-Blat, Maria, 2021. "Qualitative analysis for joint ventures as an entry mode in foreign direct investment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 324-332.
    20. Ángel Peiró-Signes & Óscar Trull & Marival Segarra-Oña & J. Carlos García-Díaz, 2020. "Attitudes Towards Statistics in Secondary Education: Findings from fsQCA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8531-:d:1490005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.