IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8343-d1485699.html

What Type of Public Library Best Supports Agricultural Economic Development? An Empirical Study Based on Rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Dimeng Zhang

    (Hangzhou City University Library, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China)

  • Jiayao Li

    (College of Art and Communication, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 314423, China)

  • Yingchi Ye

    (Future Front Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Rong Zhang

    (Future Front Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yuntao Zou

    (Future Front Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    School of Computer of Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Modernizing agricultural economies requires the infusion of knowledge and industrialization, necessitating the bridging of the “digital divide” and “talent gap” between urban and rural areas. Public libraries, as key knowledge dissemination institutions, play a crucial role in this process. This study aimed to explore how the development of such institutions can align with agricultural economic growth. Using China as a case study, where the Rural Revitalization Strategy has been implemented in recent years, including the extensive construction of rural public libraries and other infrastructure, we empirically analyzed the correlation between county-level public libraries and agricultural economic development from 2012 to 2019. The results show that the number of county-level public libraries and their assets, collection sizes, e-books, and professional staff have a significant positive impact on agricultural economics, while non-professional staff and facilities have a negative impact. It is recommended that future rural public library development should focus on enhancing professional standards and advancing digitalization and mobile internet integration, while being cautious about expanding the physical scale and staffing. This study fills a gap in the research on the correlation between rural public libraries and agricultural economics, and the methodology employed has a certain degree of general applicability. However, the applicability of the conclusions may be limited by China’s unique national conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimeng Zhang & Jiayao Li & Yingchi Ye & Rong Zhang & Yuntao Zou, 2024. "What Type of Public Library Best Supports Agricultural Economic Development? An Empirical Study Based on Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8343-:d:1485699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8343/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8343/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golany, B & Roll, Y, 1989. "An application procedure for DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 237-250.
    2. Catherine Paul & Richard Nehring & David Banker & Agapi Somwaru, 2004. "Scale Economies and Efficiency in U.S. Agriculture: Are Traditional Farms History?," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 185-205, November.
    3. Yuan Wang & Yifang Huang & Yihua Zhang, 2023. "Coupling and Coordinated Development of Digital Economy and Rural Revitalisation and Analysis of Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong Ye & Yaoyao Ding & Rong Zhang & Yuntao Zou, 2025. "A Study on the Correlation Between Urbanization and Agricultural Economy Based on Efficiency Measurement and Quantile Regression: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Wen Zhang & Rong Zhang & Yuntao Zou, 2024. "Urbanization and Cultural Industry Correlation: An Empirical Analysis from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Arsen Benga & Glediana Zeneli (Foto) & María Jesús Delgado‑Rodríguez & Sonia Lucas Santos, 2025. "Company efforts and environmental efficiency: evidence from European railways considering market-based emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 9977-10012, May.
    5. Alessandra Cepparulo & Gilles Mourre, 2020. "How and How Much? The Growth-Friendliness of Public Spending through the Lens," European Economy - Discussion Papers 132, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    6. Peyrache, Antonio & Rose, Christiern & Sicilia, Gabriela, 2020. "Variable selection in Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 644-659.
    7. Fang Zhang & Dengyu Wang & Xi Zhou & Fan Ye, 2024. "Community Resilience Evaluation and Construction Strategies in the Perspective of Public Health Emergencies: A Case Study of Six Communities in Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock & Antonio Estache & Barnabé Walheer, 2013. "Reducing Energy Use without Affecting the Economic Objectives: a Sectoral Analysis," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2013-11, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Richard Simper & Maximilian J.B. Hall & Wenbin B. Liu & Valentin Zelenyuk & Zhongbao Zhou, 2014. "How Relevant is the Choice of Risk Management Control Variable to Non-parametric Bank Profit Efficiency Analysis?," CEPA Working Papers Series WP122014, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    10. Claire Murong Cui & Julie A. Harrison & Frederick Ng & Paul Rouse, 2025. "Accounting choices in data envelopment analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 219-237, April.
    11. Ti-An Chen, 2022. "Business Performance Evaluation for Tourism Factory: Using DEA Approach and Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Wijesiri, Mahinda & Yaron, Jacob & Meoli, Michele, 2017. "Assessing the financial and outreach efficiency of microfinance institutions: Do age and size matter?," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 63-76.
    13. Wenqi Li & Li Zhang & Inhee Lee & Menelaos Gkartzios, 2023. "Overview of Social Policies for Town and Village Development in Response to Rural Shrinkage in East Asia: The Cases of Japan, South Korea and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Nguyen Thi Kim Lien & Luyen Le Anh, 2024. "Adopting SBM-Max and Super SBM-Max to Evaluate the Efficiency of Freight Transportation Arrangement Providers: A Study in Vietnam," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 73-84.
    15. Md. Sohel Rana & Hasanul Banna & Md Aslam Mia & Izlin Binti Ismail & Mohd Nazari Bin Ismail, 2022. "How Productive Are the Microfinance Institutionsin Bangladesh? An Application of Malmquist Productivity Index," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 10(2), pages 155-177, December.
    16. Andrew D. Foster & Mark R. Rosenzweig, 2022. "Are There Too Many Farms in the World? Labor Market Transaction Costs, Machine Capacities, and Optimal Farm Size," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(3), pages 636-680.
    17. Parman, Bryon & Featherstone, Allen & Coffey, Brian, "undated". "Is Efficiency Analysis All There Is With Data Envelopment Analysis," Working Papers 197532, Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    18. Khoshroo, Alireza & Izadikhah, Mohammad & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2022. "Total factor energy productivity considering undesirable pollutant outputs: A new double frontier based malmquist productivity index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. Hsu, Wen-Kai & Huang, Show-Hui & Le, Thu Ngo Ngoc & Huynh, Nguyen Tan & Wang, Ding-Ji, 2025. "Assessing container terminals’ efficiency from the sustainable development perspective: The BWM-GRA-SBM model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 443-455.
    20. Mugera, Amin W. & Langemeier, Michael R., 2011. "Does Farm Size and Specialization Matter for Productive Efficiency? Results from Kansas," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 515-528, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8343-:d:1485699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.