IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p8155-d1480634.html

Intelligent Development, Knowledge Breadth, and High-Tech Enterprise Innovation: The Moderating Role of Knowledge Absorptive Capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Zhang

    (School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
    Business School, Henan University of Engineering, Zhengzhou 451191, China)

  • Duoxun Ba

    (Tourism College, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Innovation serves as the cornerstone for high-quality development in high-tech enterprises, with intelligent development emerging as a central aspect of innovation efforts. However, how intelligent development promotes the innovative development of high-tech enterprises is still a topic of continuous debate and exploration. By integrating enterprise innovation theory and knowledge-based theory, this paper constructs a theoretical framework to examine the influence of intelligent development on high-tech enterprise innovation. Through an analysis of 694 listed high-tech enterprises on China’s manufacturing A-share market from 2013 to 2021, we empirically investigated the effects of mediating mechanisms and moderating effects of intelligent development on high-tech enterprise innovation. The results show that intelligent development significantly boosts high-tech enterprise innovation. Knowledge breadth plays a mediating role in the relationship between intelligent development and high-tech enterprise innovation, indicating that intelligent development promotes high-tech enterprise innovation by enhancing knowledge breadth. Additionally, knowledge absorptive capacity can strengthen the impact of knowledge breadth on high-tech enterprise innovation, that is, the stronger the knowledge absorptive capacity, the greater the impact of knowledge breadth on high-tech enterprise innovation. The conclusion of this paper provides a theoretical basis and practical guidance for high-tech enterprises regarding how to better use intelligent technology for innovation. Relevant enterprises can strengthen their knowledge management and mobility strategies and fully utilize the potential of intelligent technology to achieve more innovative and competitive development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Zhang & Duoxun Ba, 2024. "Intelligent Development, Knowledge Breadth, and High-Tech Enterprise Innovation: The Moderating Role of Knowledge Absorptive Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8155-:d:1480634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8155/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8155/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerard George & Reddi Kotha & Yanfeng Zheng, 2008. "Entry into Insular Domains: A Longitudinal Study of Knowledge Structuration and Innovation in Biotechnology Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1448-1474, December.
    2. Arthur Lewbel, 1997. "Constructing Instruments for Regressions with Measurement Error when no Additional Data are Available, with an Application to Patents and R&D," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1201-1214, September.
    3. Xie, Xuemei & Zou, Hailiang & Qi, Guoyou, 2018. "Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in high-tech companies: A multi-mediating analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 289-297.
    4. Mariani, Marcello M. & Machado, Isa & Magrelli, Vittoria & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2023. "Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    5. Huang, Kuo-Feng & Lin, Ku-Ho & Wu, Lei-Yu & Yu, Pang-Hsiang, 2015. "Absorptive capacity and autonomous R&D climate roles in firm innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 87-94.
    6. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Askay, David & Eshraghi, Ali & Smith, Preston, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and knowledge management: A partnership between human and AI," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 87-99.
    7. Mariani, Marcello M. & Nambisan, Satish, 2021. "Innovation Analytics and Digital Innovation Experimentation: The Rise of Research-driven Online Review Platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Han, Jie & Jiang, Cailou & Liu, Rong, 2023. "Does intelligent transformation trigger technology innovation in China's NEV enterprises?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    9. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Caroline Bingxin Li, 2012. "How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9), pages 1090-1102, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zu, Xu & Ni, Guangxian & Hu, Ruifeng, 2025. "AI technology innovation, knowledge management and corporate environmental sustainability: Evidence from Chinese patent data," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. An, Meng & Lin, Jiabao & Luo, Xin (Robert), 2024. "The impact of human AI skills on organizational innovation: The moderating role of digital organizational culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Zouaghi, Ferdaous & Sánchez, Mercedes & Martínez, Marian García, 2018. "Did the global financial crisis impact firms' innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high and low tech industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 92-104.
    4. Wang, Shaofeng & Zhang, Hao, 2024. "Green entrepreneurship success in the age of generative artificial intelligence: The interplay of technology adoption, knowledge management, and government support," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Xie, Xuemei & Zou, Hailiang & Qi, Guoyou, 2018. "Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in high-tech companies: A multi-mediating analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 289-297.
    6. Papazoglou, Michalis E. & Spanos, Yiannis E., 2018. "Bridging distant technological domains: A longitudinal study of the determinants of breadth of innovation diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1713-1728.
    7. Magistretti, Stefano & Dell’Era, Claudio & Candi, Marina & Swan, Scott K. & Bianchi, Mattia & Calabretta, Giulia & Stigliani, Ileana & Verganti, Roberto, 2025. "Unpacking experimentation in design thinking: Contributions to innovation performance and the moderating role of digital technologies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Fu, Yu & Chen, Yijun & Zhang, Yulin & Wang, Menghan & Yu, Yuanchun, 2026. "Corporate productivity transformation under the innovation paradigm: The role and impact of artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Shafique, Muhammad & Hagedoorn, John, 2022. "Look at U: Technological scope of the acquirer, technological complementarity with the target, and post-acquisition R&D output," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Garcia Martinez, Marian & Zouaghi, Ferdaous & Sanchez Garcia, Mercedes, 2017. "Capturing value from alliance portfolio diversity: The mediating role of R&D human capital in high and low tech industries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 55-67.
    11. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Mariani, Marcello & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2023. "Examining the role of intellectual capital on knowledge sharing in digital platform-based MNEs and its impact on firm performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. SUN, Yu-tao & ZHANG, Chen & WANG, Jin-min, 2022. "How to Benefit from Balancing External Knowledge Acquisition? A Chinese EIT Industry Case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. Zhongyuan Sun & Xuelong Wu & Ying Dong & Xuming Lou, 2025. "How Does Artificial Intelligence Application Enable Sustainable Breakthrough Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.
    14. Jiang, Zihao & Shi, Jiarong & Liu, Zhiying, 2025. "Digital transformation, knowledge management, and ambidextrous innovation in the high-speed train industry in China: The role of TMT’s digital knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Meng Liu & Yikai Luo & Xingkai Luo, 2025. "Shadow banking development and corporate green innovation: evidence from A-share listed manufacturing companies in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Jiaxing Du & Han Cai & Xiu Jin, 2024. "Exploring the Association Between Artificial Intelligence Management and Green Innovation: Expanding the Research Field for Sustainable Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Mariani, Marcello & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2024. "Generative artificial intelligence in innovation management: A preview of future research developments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Meixia Wang & Huiping Wang, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Knowledge search and innovation performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1060-1070, December.
    19. Roberts, Nicholas, 2015. "Absorptive capacity, organizational antecedents, and environmental dynamism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2426-2433.
    20. Ma, Dechao & Wu, Weiwei, 2024. "Does artificial intelligence drive technology convergence? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8155-:d:1480634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.