IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7373-d1465000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Energy-Saving Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Green and Low-Carbon Enterprises Based on Three-Stage DEA and Tobit Models

Author

Listed:
  • Fenfang Xu

    (School of Resource and Security Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Teng Shao

    (Domestic Cooperation Office, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Ruili Hu

    (Department of Security, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Minbo Zhang

    (School of Resource and Security Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Implementing the “dual-carbon” objective has profoundly affected China’s businesses, prompting a continuous process of transformation and innovation. Green, low-carbon transformation, upgrading, and sustainable development have emerged as the means to achieve high-quality company growth, with firms playing a crucial role in achieving the “dual-carbon” target. By prioritizing firms’ green, low-carbon, and sustainable growth, not only can their economic efficiency be improved, but it also serves as a vital measure to advance high-quality development. To achieve this objective, it is crucial to analyze the elements that impact the energy-saving effectiveness of businesses to develop optimization tactics that can enhance their competitiveness. This study combines the three-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the Tobit model to assess the energy-saving efficiency of green and low-carbon firms from 2018 to 2022. The analysis focuses on selected samples from various areas and industries. The study investigates the relationship between energy-saving effectiveness and different regional and industrial parameters, considering the distinct attributes of each firm and the key elements that influence its energy-saving performance. The findings indicate that green, low-carbon firms typically demonstrate suboptimal energy-saving efficiency but have considerable room for improvement. Upon considering environmental concerns, it becomes clear that the primary limitation on energy-saving performance is the lower efficiency of the enterprise scale. The energy-saving efficiency of green, low-carbon firms varies significantly across different regions and industries. On average, northern firms in the energy-saving and carbon reduction industry, as well as the resource recycling industry, have higher energy-saving efficiency compared to southern enterprises. In contrast, the environmental protection industry in southern firms demonstrates a better average energy-saving efficiency compared to their northern counterparts. Employee quality, policy support, and automation are key factors that greatly enhance the energy-saving efficiency of firms in both regions. Enterprise size has a beneficial impact on the energy-saving efficiency of southern firms but a negative impact on northern enterprises. Moreover, the industry and financial structures exert a detrimental influence on enhancing the energy-saving efficiency of green and low-carbon firms. Thus, in order to improve the energy-saving effectiveness of businesses, it is essential to utilize the elements that have a positive influence on energy-saving performance and reduce the impact of those that have negative impacts. This strategy will enhance the energy-saving efficiency of businesses and promote the development of an environmentally friendly and low-carbon society.

Suggested Citation

  • Fenfang Xu & Teng Shao & Ruili Hu & Minbo Zhang, 2024. "Research on Energy-Saving Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Green and Low-Carbon Enterprises Based on Three-Stage DEA and Tobit Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7373-:d:1465000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Fried & C. Lovell & S. Schmidt & S. Yaisawarng, 2002. "Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 157-174, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franz R. Hahn, 2007. "Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Europe. Assessing Bank Performance Across Markets," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31499, October.
    2. Jia Li & Yahong Zheng & Bing Liu & Yanyi Chen & Zhihang Zhong & Chenyu Dong & Chaoqun Wang, 2024. "The Synergistic Relationship between Low-Carbon Development of Road Freight Transport and Its Economic Efficiency—A Case Study of Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Zhang, Zumeng & Ding, Liping & Wang, Chaofan & Dai, Qiyao & Shi, Yin & Zhao, Yujia & Zhu, Yuxuan, 2022. "Do operation and maintenance contracts help photovoltaic poverty alleviation power stations perform better?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Jens Kjærsgaard & Niels Vestergaard & Kristiaan Kerstens, 2009. "Ecological Benchmarking to Explore Alternative Fishing Schemes to Protect Endangered Species by Substitution: The Danish Demersal Fishery in the North Sea," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 43(4), pages 573-590, August.
    5. Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Wu, Haitao, 2022. "The role of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on green total factor energy efficiency: Does institutional quality matters? Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Nolwenn Roudaut & Anne Vanhems, 2012. "Explaining firms efficiency in the Ivorian manufacturing sector: a robust nonparametric approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 155-169, April.
    7. Fu, Shuke & Ge, Yingchen & Hao, Yu & Peng, Jiachao & Tian, Jiali, 2024. "Energy supply chain efficiency in the digital era: Evidence from China's listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Miki Tsutsui & Kaoru Tone, 2007. "Separation of uncontrollable factors and time shift effects from DEA scores," GRIPS Discussion Papers 07-09, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    9. Yang, Shang-Ho & Burdine, Kenneth H. & Hu, Wu-Yueh, 2016. "An Alternative Approach to Estimate the Economic Loss of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea (PED) via Data Envelopment Analysis: The Case in Taiwan," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235574, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Pengyu Ren & Zhaoxia Liu, 2021. "Efficiency Evaluation of China’s Public Sports Services: A Three-Stage DEA Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Ke Huang & Martin Dallimer & Lindsay C. Stringer & Anlu Zhang & Ting Zhang, 2021. "Does Economic Agglomeration Lead to Efficient Rural to Urban Land Conversion? An Examination of China’s Metropolitan Area Development Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Huayong Niu & Zhishuo Zhang & Yao Xiao & Manting Luo & Yumeng Chen, 2022. "A Study of Carbon Emission Efficiency in Chinese Provinces Based on a Three-Stage SBM-Undesirable Model and an LSTM Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Yu, Ming-Miin, 2010. "Assessment of airport performance using the SBM-NDEA model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 440-452, December.
    14. Weixin Yang & Lingguang Li, 2017. "Energy Efficiency, Ownership Structure, and Sustainable Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-26, June.
    15. Jiazhan Gao & Guihong Hua & Baofeng Huo, 2025. "Turning “green” into “gold”: A study on the impact of green finance pilot zone policy on energy carbon emission efficiency," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 129-143, February.
    16. Wanke, Peter & Barros, C.P. & Figueiredo, Otávio, 2016. "Efficiency and productive slacks in urban transportation modes: A two-stage SDEA-Beta Regression approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 31-39.
    17. Brown, Rayna, 2006. "Mismanagement or mismeasurement? Pitfalls and protocols for DEA studies in the financial services sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1100-1116, October.
    18. Kozo Harimaya & Kei Tomimura & Nobuyoshi Yamori, 2015. "Efficiencies of Small Financial Cooperatives in Japan: Comparison of Estimation Methods," Discussion Paper Series DP2015-04, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    19. Antonis Adam & Manthos Delis & Pantelis Kammas, 2011. "Public sector efficiency: leveling the playing field between OECD countries," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 163-183, January.
    20. Tavana, Madjid & Ebrahimnejad, Ali & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. & Mansourzadeh, Seyed Mehdi & Matin, Reza Kazemi, 2018. "A hybrid DEA-MOLP model for public school assessment and closure decision in the City of Philadelphia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 70-89.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7373-:d:1465000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.