IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4263-d1397291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Battery Electric Vehicles: Travel Characteristics of Early Adopters

Author

Listed:
  • Yunwen Feng

    (Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA)

  • Jean-Daniel Saphores

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA)

  • Hilary Nixon

    (Mineta Transportation Institute, San José State University, San Jose, CA 95192, USA)

  • Monica Ramirez Ibarra

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA)

Abstract

Do U.S. households with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) drive less or more than U.S. households with internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs)? Answering this question is important to policymakers and transportation planners concerned with reducing vehicle miles traveled and the emissions of greenhouse gases from transportation. So far, this question has not been answered satisfactorily, possibly because of the relatively low number of EVs in the U.S. until recently, but also because of methodological issues. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by analyzing data from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). We apply propensity score matching (PSM), a quasi-experimental method, to examine the differences in self-reported annual mileage and calculated daily mileage for various trip purposes among households with only BEVs (BEV-only), households with both BEVs and ICEVs (BEV+), and households without BEVs (non-BEV households). Our findings indicate that households with BEVs drive fewer annual miles than non-BEV households, but typically travel no less than they do for daily activities. This apparent discrepancy is likely due to taking fewer longer trips because the public charging infrastructure was still in its infancy in 2017, and its reliability was questionable. As technological progress is helping to overcome current battery limitations, policymakers may consider measures for fostering fast charging technologies while pondering new measures to fund both the charging infrastructure and the road network.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunwen Feng & Jean-Daniel Saphores & Hilary Nixon & Monica Ramirez Ibarra, 2024. "Battery Electric Vehicles: Travel Characteristics of Early Adopters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4263-:d:1397291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4263/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4263/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gong, Huiming & Zou, Yuan & Yang, Qingkai & Fan, Jie & Sun, Fengchun & Goehlich, Dietmar, 2018. "Generation of a driving cycle for battery electric vehicles：A case study of Beijing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 901-912.
    2. Cui, Dingsong & Wang, Zhenpo & Liu, Peng & Wang, Shuo & Zhang, Zhaosheng & Dorrell, David G. & Li, Xiaohui, 2022. "Battery electric vehicle usage pattern analysis driven by massive real-world data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt70f4r9wc is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Yang, Xiong & Zhuge, Chengxiang & Shao, Chunfu & Huang, Yuantan & Hayse Chiwing G. Tang, Justin & Sun, Mingdong & Wang, Pinxi & Wang, Shiqi, 2022. "Characterizing mobility patterns of private electric vehicle users with trajectory data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    5. Priessner, Alfons & Sposato, Robert & Hampl, Nina, 2018. "Predictors of electric vehicle adoption: An analysis of potential electric vehicle drivers in Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 701-714.
    6. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt1jh8127j is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Chao-Yang Wang & Teng Liu & Xiao-Guang Yang & Shanhai Ge & Nathaniel V. Stanley & Eric S. Rountree & Yongjun Leng & Brian D. McCarthy, 2022. "Fast charging of energy-dense lithium-ion batteries," Nature, Nature, vol. 611(7936), pages 485-490, November.
    8. Brady, John & O’Mahony, Margaret, 2016. "Development of a driving cycle to evaluate the energy economy of electric vehicles in urban areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 165-178.
    9. White, Lee V. & Sintov, Nicole D., 2017. "You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 94-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rafael C. Neto & Camila M. Bandeira & Gustavo M. S. Azevedo & Leonardo R. Limongi & Márcio R. S. de Carvalho & José F. C. Castro & Pedro A. C. Rosas & Augusto C. Venerando & Newmar Spader & Emilio Bue, 2024. "Mobile Charging Stations: A Comprehensive Review of Converter Topologies and Market Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-38, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruyu Xie & Liren An & Nosheena Yasir, 2022. "How Innovative Characteristics Influence Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Electric Vehicle: A Moderating Role of Lifestyle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Yang, Xiong & Peng, Zhenhan & Wang, Pinxi & Zhuge, Chengxiang, 2023. "Seasonal variance in electric vehicle charging demand and its impacts on infrastructure deployment: A big data approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    3. Peng, Ruoqing & Tang, Justin Hayse Chiwing G. & Yang, Xiong & Meng, Meng & Zhang, Jie & Zhuge, Chengxiang, 2024. "Investigating the factors influencing the electric vehicle market share: A comparative study of the European Union and United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    4. Cui, Yuepeng & Xu, Hao & Zou, Fumin & Chen, Zhihui & Gong, Kuangmin, 2021. "Optimization based method to develop representative driving cycle for real-world fuel consumption estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Qiao, Qinyu & Zhao, Fuquan & Liu, Zongwei & He, Xin & Hao, Han, 2019. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Electric Vehicles in China: Combining the vehicle cycle and fuel cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 222-233.
    6. Zhang, Jin & Wang, Zhenpo & Liu, Peng & Zhang, Zhaosheng & Li, Xiaoyu & Qu, Changhui, 2019. "Driving cycles construction for electric vehicles considering road environment: A case study in Beijing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Wu, Ziyang & Wang, Can & Wolfram, Paul & Zhang, Yaxin & Sun, Xin & Hertwich, Edgar, 2019. "Assessing electric vehicle policy with region-specific carbon footprints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Ball-Burack, Ari & Sun, Ruixiao & Stack, Stephen & Ou, Shiqi (Shawn) & Bose, Ranjan & Yang, Hung-Chia, 2025. "Assessing the behavioral realism of energy system models in light of the consumer adoption literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    9. Wang, Shengyou & Zhuge, Chengxiang & Shao, Chunfu & Wang, Pinxi & Yang, Xiong & Wang, Shiqi, 2023. "Short-term electric vehicle charging demand prediction: A deep learning approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    10. Jia, Wenjian & Ma, Zhuanglin & Zhao, Yangyang & Luo, Mingjie, 2025. "Understanding the role of electric vehicle perception in shaping EV adoption intention," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 255-264.
    11. Cui, Yuepeng & Zou, Fumin & Xu, Hao & Chen, Zhihui & Gong, Kuangmin, 2022. "A novel optimization-based method to develop representative driving cycle in various driving conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    12. Yang, Zaoli & Li, Qin & Yan, Yamin & Shang, Wen-Long & Ochieng, Washington, 2022. "Examining influence factors of Chinese electric vehicle market demand based on online reviews under moderating effect of subsidy policy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    13. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    14. Zhang, Chengquan & Kitamura, Hiroshi & Goto, Mika, 2024. "Feasibility of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) implementation in Japan: A regional analysis of the electricity supply and demand adjustment market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    15. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Wang, Jiaxing & Matsumoto, Shigeru, 2022. "Can subsidy programs lead consumers to select “greener” products?: Evidence from the Eco-car program in Japan," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Christian Wankmüller & Maximilian Kunovjanek & Robert Gennaro Sposato & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Wang, Zhenpo & Zhang, Dayu & Liu, Peng & Lin, Ni & Zhang, Zhaosheng & She, Chengqi, 2024. "An online inconsistency evaluation and abnormal cell identification method for real-world electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    19. Jung-Chieh Lee & Ting Li & Lihui Zhang, 2025. "Environmental concerns and green trust in continuous green fintech use: an expectation-confirmation model with insights from Ant Forest," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Khan, Waqas & Somers, Ward & Walker, Shalika & de Bont, Kevin & Van der Velden, Joep & Zeiler, Wim, 2023. "Comparison of electric vehicle load forecasting across different spatial levels with incorporated uncertainty estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4263-:d:1397291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.