IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7656-d1140918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Parameters in SDM Application on Citrus Presence in Mediterranean Area

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Antonio Catalano

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia n. 100, 95123 Catania, Italy)

  • Provvidenza Rita D’Urso

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia n. 100, 95123 Catania, Italy)

  • Federico Maci

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia n. 100, 95123 Catania, Italy)

  • Claudia Arcidiacono

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia n. 100, 95123 Catania, Italy)

Abstract

Within the context of Agriculture 4.0, the importance of predicting species distribution is increasing due to climatic change. The use of predictive species distribution models represents an essential tool for land planning and resource conservation. However, studies in the literature on Suitability Distribution Models (SDMs) under specific conditions are required to optimize the model accuracy in a specific context through map inspection and sensitivity analyses. The aim of this study was to optimize the simulation of the citrus distribution probability in a Mediterranean area based on presence data and a random background sample, in relation to several predictors. It was hypothesized that different parameter settings affected the SDM. The objectives were to compare different parameter settings and assess the effect of the number of input points related to species presence. Simulation of citrus occurrence was based on five algorithms: Boosted Regression Tree (BRT), Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt), and Random Forest (RF). The predictors were categorized based on 19 bioclimatic variables, terrain elevation (represented by a Digital Terrain Model), soil physical properties, and irrigation. Sensitivity analysis was carried out by (a) modifying the values of the main models’ parameters; and (b) reducing the input presence points. Fine-tuning the parameters for each model according to the literature in the field produced variations in the selection of predictors. Consequently, probability changed in the maps and values of the accuracy measures modified. Results obtained by using refined parameters showed a reduced overfitting for BRT, yet associated with a decrease in the AUC value from 0.91 to 0.81; minor variations in AUC for GLM (equal to about 0.85) and MARS (about 0.83); a slight AUC reduction for MaxEnt (from 0.86 to 0.85); a slight AUC increase for RF (from 0.88 to 0.89). The reduction in presence points produced a decrease in the surface area for citrus probability of presence in all the models. Therefore, for the case study analyzed, it is suggested to keep input presence points above 250. In these simulations, we also analyzed which covariates and related ranges contributed most to the predicted value of citrus presence, for this case study, for different amounts of input presence points. In RF simulations, for 250 points, isothermality was one of the major predictors of citrus probability of presence (up to 0.8), while at increasing of the input points the contribution of the covariates was more uniform (0.4–0.6) in their range of variation.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Antonio Catalano & Provvidenza Rita D’Urso & Federico Maci & Claudia Arcidiacono, 2023. "Influence of Parameters in SDM Application on Citrus Presence in Mediterranean Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7656-:d:1140918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7656/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7656/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas E Young & Catherine S Jarnevich & Helen R Sofaer & Ian Pearse & Julia Sullivan & Peder Engelstad & Thomas J Stohlgren, 2020. "A modeling workflow that balances automation and human intervention to inform invasive plant management decisions at multiple spatial scales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Wolfgang Cramer & Joël Guiot & Marianela Fader & Joaquim Garrabou & Jean-Pierre Gattuso & Ana Iglesias & Manfred A. Lange & Piero Lionello & Maria Carmen Llasat & Shlomit Paz & Josep Peñuelas & Maria , 2018. "Climate change and interconnected risks to sustainable development in the Mediterranean," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(11), pages 972-980, November.
    3. Oussama Zouabi & Mohamed Kadria, 2016. "The direct and indirect effect of climate change on citrus production in Tunisia: a macro and micro spatial analysis," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 307-324, November.
    4. Jarnevich, Catherine S. & Talbert, Marian & Morisette, Jeffery & Aldridge, Cameron & Brown, Cynthia S. & Kumar, Sunil & Manier, Daniel & Talbert, Colin & Holcombe, Tracy, 2017. "Minimizing effects of methodological decisions on interpretation and prediction in species distribution studies: An example with background selection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 48-56.
    5. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 197-227, June.
    6. Uzma Ashraf & Hassan Ali & Muhammad Nawaz Chaudry & Irfan Ashraf & Adila Batool & Zafeer Saqib, 2016. "Predicting the Potential Distribution of Olea ferruginea in Pakistan incorporating Climate Change by Using Maxent Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "Rejoinder on: A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 264-268, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Domenico Trifilò & Provvidenza Rita D’Urso & Claudia Arcidiacono, 2023. "A Methodology for Classifying Attractive Sources Related to Airport Birdstrike by Using Geospatial Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hou, Lei & Elsworth, Derek & Zhang, Fengshou & Wang, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Jianbo, 2023. "Evaluation of proppant injection based on a data-driven approach integrating numerical and ensemble learning models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Ma, Zhikai & Huo, Qian & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Tao, 2023. "Voltage-temperature aware thermal runaway alarming framework for electric vehicles via deep learning with attention mechanism in time-frequency domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    3. Patrick Krennmair & Timo Schmid, 2022. "Flexible domain prediction using mixed effects random forests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1865-1894, November.
    4. Jie Shi & Arno P. J. M. Siebes & Siamak Mehrkanoon, 2023. "TransCORALNet: A Two-Stream Transformer CORAL Networks for Supply Chain Credit Assessment Cold Start," Papers 2311.18749, arXiv.org.
    5. Bourdouxhe, Axel & Wibail, Lionel & Claessens, Hugues & Dufrêne, Marc, 2023. "Modeling potential natural vegetation: A new light on an old concept to guide nature conservation in fragmented and degraded landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    6. Manuel J. García Rodríguez & Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Francisco Ortega Fernández & Joaquín M. Villanueva Balsera, 2019. "Public Procurement Announcements in Spain: Regulations, Data Analysis, and Award Price Estimator Using Machine Learning," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-20, November.
    7. Borup, Daniel & Christensen, Bent Jesper & Mühlbach, Nicolaj Søndergaard & Nielsen, Mikkel Slot, 2023. "Targeting predictors in random forest regression," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 841-868.
    8. Yiyi Huo & Yingying Fan & Fang Han, 2023. "On the adaptation of causal forests to manifold data," Papers 2311.16486, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    9. Akshita Bassi & Aditya Manchanda & Rajwinder Singh & Mahesh Patel, 2023. "A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of compressive strength of rice husk ash-based concrete," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(1), pages 209-238, August.
    10. Sachin Kumar & Zairu Nisha & Jagvinder Singh & Anuj Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Sensor network driven novel hybrid model based on feature selection and SVR to predict indoor temperature for energy consumption optimisation in smart buildings," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(6), pages 3048-3061, December.
    11. Yong-Chao Su & Cheng-Yu Wu & Cheng-Hong Yang & Bo-Sheng Li & Sin-Hua Moi & Yu-Da Lin, 2021. "Machine Learning Data Imputation and Prediction of Foraging Group Size in a Kleptoparasitic Spider," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Diogenis A. Kiziridis & Anna Mastrogianni & Magdalini Pleniou & Elpida Karadimou & Spyros Tsiftsis & Fotios Xystrakis & Ioannis Tsiripidis, 2022. "Acceleration and Relocation of Abandonment in a Mediterranean Mountainous Landscape: Drivers, Consequences, and Management Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Escribano, Álvaro & Wang, Dandan, 2021. "Mixed random forest, cointegration, and forecasting gasoline prices," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1442-1462.
    14. Hunish Bansal & Basavraj Chinagundi & Prashant Singh Rana & Neeraj Kumar, 2022. "An Ensemble Machine Learning Technique for Detection of Abnormalities in Knee Movement Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Yigit Aydede & Jan Ditzen, 2022. "Identifying the regional drivers of influenza-like illness in Nova Scotia with dominance analysis," Papers 2212.06684, arXiv.org.
    16. Siyoon Kwon & Hyoseob Noh & Il Won Seo & Sung Hyun Jung & Donghae Baek, 2021. "Identification Framework of Contaminant Spill in Rivers Using Machine Learning with Breakthrough Curve Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-26, January.
    17. Lotfi Boudabsa & Damir Filipovi'c, 2022. "Ensemble learning for portfolio valuation and risk management," Papers 2204.05926, arXiv.org.
    18. Yan, Ran & Wang, Shuaian & Du, Yuquan, 2020. "Development of a two-stage ship fuel consumption prediction and reduction model for a dry bulk ship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    19. Daniel Boller & Michael Lechner & Gabriel Okasa, 2021. "The Effect of Sport in Online Dating: Evidence from Causal Machine Learning," Papers 2104.04601, arXiv.org.
    20. Mohamed Kais Msakni & Anders Risan & Peter Schütz, 2023. "Using machine learning prediction models for quality control: a case study from the automotive industry," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-28, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7656-:d:1140918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.