IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7320-d1135130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Influence of Entrepreneurial Apprehension and Entrepreneurial Strategic Orientation on Breakthrough Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Qiliang Wang

    (College of Business, Quzhou University, Quzhou 324000, China)

  • Qingquan Jiang

    (School of Economics & Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China)

  • Hongxia Yu

    (School of Economics & Management, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China)

Abstract

At present, there are few studies on breakthrough innovation (BI) involving entrepreneurial apprehension (EA). The purpose of this study is to identify how entrepreneurial apprehension affects breakthrough innovation. Based on the theory of planned behavior, the paper constructs a theoretical conceptual model of the influence of entrepreneurial apprehension and entrepreneurial strategic orientation (ESO) on breakthrough innovation and proposes corresponding research hypotheses, while using SPSS to conduct regression analysis of 216 valid questionnaires from high-tech enterprises in Yangtze River Delta. The results show that entrepreneurial apprehension can promote breakthrough innovation, but that entrepreneurial strategic orientation plays a partially mediating role in the process of entrepreneurial apprehension influencing breakthrough innovation. The incorporation of entrepreneurial apprehension into the study of breakthrough innovation complements and improves on the theory of entrepreneurial motivation for breakthrough innovation, and the study of entrepreneurial apprehension effectively expands the content of entrepreneurship theory. The paper concludes with the most important managerial implications and outlook for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiliang Wang & Qingquan Jiang & Hongxia Yu, 2023. "Analysis of the Influence of Entrepreneurial Apprehension and Entrepreneurial Strategic Orientation on Breakthrough Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7320-:d:1135130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7320/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7320/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsui-Yii Shih, 2018. "Determinants of Enterprises Radical Innovation and Performance: Insights into Strategic Orientation of Cultural and Creative Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Muhammad Adamu, 2019. "Potential entrepreneurs transition from corporate organisations: the relationships of organisational culture and entrepreneurial motivation," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 330-348.
    3. Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, Gregory G., 2001. "Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 429-451, September.
    4. John E. Ettlie & William P. Bridges & Robert D. O'Keefe, 1984. "Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 682-695, June.
    5. Akçomak, I. Semih & ter Weel, Bas, 2009. "Social capital, innovation and growth: Evidence from Europe," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 544-567, July.
    6. Huishuang Su & Xintong Qu & Shuo Tian & Qiang Ma & Ling Li & Yong Chen, 2022. "Artificial intelligence empowerment: The impact of research and development investment on green radical innovation in high‐tech enterprises," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 489-502, May.
    7. Zhou, Kevin Zheng & Li, Caroline Bingxin, 2010. "How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 224-231, March.
    8. Alfred Osta & Bassem Maamari, 2020. "Openness in research and development: co-patenting impact on breakthrough innovations in the pharmaceutical industry," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(3), pages 395-408.
    9. David J. Teece, 2012. "Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(8), pages 1395-1401, December.
    10. Khanmohammadi, Ehsan & Malmir, Behnam & Safari, Hossein & Zandieh, Mostafa, 2019. "A new approach to strategic objectives ranking based on fuzzy logarithmic least squares method and fuzzy similarity technique," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    11. Ansari, Shahzad (Shaz) & Krop, Pieter, 2012. "Incumbent performance in the face of a radical innovation: Towards a framework for incumbent challenger dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1357-1374.
    12. Xiaoting Yang & Jie Yang & Ning An, 2022. "Social Networks, Social Responsibility, and Sustainable Development of Chinese Corporations in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, January.
    13. Ranjay Gulati & Phanish Puranam, 2009. "Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies Between Formal and Informal Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 422-440, April.
    14. Mary Tripsas, 2009. "Technology, Identity, and Inertia Through the Lens of “The Digital Photography Company”," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 441-460, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhongyuan Sun & Xuelong Wu & Ying Dong & Xuming Lou, 2025. "How Does Artificial Intelligence Application Enable Sustainable Breakthrough Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Hui Guang & Ying Liu & Jiao Feng & Nan Wang, 2024. "Smart Manufacturing and Enterprise Breakthrough Innovation: Co-Existence Test of “U-Shaped” and Inverted “U-Shaped” Relationships in Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Bo Fan & Yunfei Shao & Zhichun Dong & Xiangrong Zhou, 2025. "Ambidextrous Alliances, Complementary Assets, and Firms’ Breakthrough Innovations: Evidence from High-Tech Firms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodrigo-Alarcón, Job & García-Villaverde, Pedro M. & Ruiz-Ortega, María J. & Parra-Requena, Gloria, 2018. "From social capital to entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 195-209.
    2. Zach, Florian J. & Nicolau, Juan L. & Sharma, Abhinav, 2020. "Disruptive innovation, innovation adoption and incumbent market value: The case of Airbnb," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. repec:sgm:pzwzuw:v:14:i:62:y:2016:p:24-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Sarkar, Soumodip & Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy & Clegg, Stewart R., 2018. "Incumbent capability enhancement in response to radical innovations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 353-365.
    5. Rogier van de Wetering & Tom Hendrickx & Sjaak Brinkkemper & Sherah Kurnia, 2021. "The Impact of EA-Driven Dynamic Capabilities, Innovativeness, and Structure on Organizational Benefits: A Variance and fsQCA Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Saeed Khanagha & Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari & Sotirios Paroutis & Luciano Oviedo, 2022. "Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of Cisco and fog computing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 476-506, March.
    7. Prajogo, Daniel I., 2016. "The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 241-249.
    8. Nadine Kammerlander & Andreas König & Melanie Richards, 2018. "Why Do Incumbents Respond Heterogeneously to Disruptive Innovations? The Interplay of Domain Identity and Role Identity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1122-1165, November.
    9. Buccieri, Dominic & Javalgi, Raj G. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2020. "International new venture performance: Role of international entrepreneurial culture, ambidextrous innovation, and dynamic marketing capabilities," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    10. Michael Sheppard, 2023. "The behavioural gap between entrepreneurial SME’s and high growth: evidence from Canada," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 427-449, March.
    11. Dubey, Rameshwar & Bryde, David J. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Graham, Gary & Foropon, Cyril & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2023. "Dynamic digital capabilities and supply chain resilience: The role of government effectiveness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    12. Crespo, Nuno Fernandes & Simões, Vitor Corado & Fontes, Margarida, 2022. "Uncovering the factors behind new ventures’ international performance: Capabilities, alertness and technological turbulence," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 344-359.
    13. GuiDeng Say & Gurneeta Vasudeva, 2020. "Learning from Digital Failures? The Effectiveness of Firms’ Divestiture and Management Turnover Responses to Data Breaches," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 117-142, June.
    14. Ferreras-Méndez, José Luis & Olmos-Peñuela, Julia & Salas-Vallina, Andrés & Alegre, Joaquín, 2021. "Entrepreneurial orientation and new product development performance in SMEs: The mediating role of business model innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. Abebe, Michael A. & Angriawan, Arifin, 2014. "Organizational and competitive influences of exploration and exploitation activities in small firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 339-345.
    16. Samuel Adomako, 2018. "The Moderating Effects Of Adaptive And Intellectual Resource Capabilities On The Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation And Financial Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-35, April.
    17. Pinar Ozcan & Douglas Hannah, 2020. "Social Origins of Great Strategies Advertising Suppliers to Realize Disruptive Social Media Technology," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 193-217, September.
    18. Sheikh Farhan Ashraf & Cai Li & Muhammad Umair Wattoo & Majid Murad & Babak Mahmood, 2024. "Green horizons: Unleashing green innovation through green business strategies and competencies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4233-4251, July.
    19. Paul E. Bierly III & Paula S. Daly, 2007. "Alternative Knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(4), pages 493-516, July.
    20. Engelen, Andreas & Kube, Harald & Schmidt, Susanne & Flatten, Tessa Christina, 2014. "Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1353-1369.
    21. Claudia D’Annunzio & Mariela Carattoli & Dolores Dupleix, 2015. "Dynamic Capabilities Associated with a Firm’s Growth in Developing Countries. A Comparative Study of Argentinean SMEs in the Software and Tourism Industries," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(4), pages 25-62.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7320-:d:1135130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.