IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6981-d1129073.html

Characterization of Tasks and Skills of Workers, Middle and Top Managers in the Industry 4.0 Context

Author

Listed:
  • Diamantino Torres

    (GOVCOPP, Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism (DEGEIT), Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    School of Design, Management and Production Technologies Northern Aveiro (ESAN-UA), University of Aveiro, Santiago de Riba-UI, 3720-511 Oliveira de Azeméis, Portugal)

  • Carina Pimentel

    (Algoritmi Research Unit, Production and Systems Department, School of Engineering, University of Minho, Campus Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • João C. O. Matias

    (GOVCOPP, Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism (DEGEIT), Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

This study intends to make a characterization of the main tasks and skills needed to face the Industry 4.0. Moreover, it gives special attention to the different company’s hierarchical levels. To achieve the goals of this paper, a methodology based on Collaborative Decision Making method was used. Firstly, thirty participants were interviewed to understand their point of views. Next, they were split into Group Works to refine the results. Finally, a Group Concordance took place to create the final list of tasks and skills. The skills were organized into four categories: Technical, Social, Methodological and Personal. The results show different requirements in each level. In the Workers level, due to the presence of more technical tasks, eight of the top ten skills belong to the Technical category. In the Middle Managers level, there are tasks of both leading and analyzing nature and thus the top ten skills needed are split through the four categories. Finally, in the Top Managers level, due to the presence of mainly strategy tasks, the top ten skills are split between the Methodological and Social categories. To the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first studies to use a Collaborative Decision Making methodology to develop a set of tasks and skills that future work environments will demand on the different hierarchical levels of the organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Diamantino Torres & Carina Pimentel & João C. O. Matias, 2023. "Characterization of Tasks and Skills of Workers, Middle and Top Managers in the Industry 4.0 Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6981-:d:1129073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6981/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6981/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan B. Krueger, 1993. "How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence from Microdata, 1984–1989," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(1), pages 33-60.
    2. Anna Kwiotkowska & Bożena Gajdzik & Radosław Wolniak & Jolita Vveinhardt & Magdalena Gębczyńska, 2021. "Leadership Competencies in Making Industry 4.0 Effective: The Case of Polish Heat and Power Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Aimee Chin & Chinhui Juhn & Peter Thompson, 2006. "Technical Change and the Demand for Skills during the Second Industrial Revolution: Evidence from the Merchant Marine, 1891-1912," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 88(3), pages 572-578, August.
    4. Ruben Heradio & David Fernandez-Amoros & Cristina Cerrada & Manuel J. Cobo, 2020. "Group Decision-Making Based on Artificial Intelligence: A Bibliometric Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Maxine Berg & Pat Hudson, 1992. "Rehabilitating the industrial revolution," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 45(1), pages 24-50, February.
    6. Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin & Michel Grundstein & Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux, 2013. "From knowledge sharing to collaborative decision making," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 295-311.
    7. Acemoglu, Daron & Autor, David, 2011. "Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 12, pages 1043-1171, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindner, Attila & Muraközy, Balázs & Reizer, Balázs & Schreiner, Ragnhild, 2022. "Firm-level technological change and skill demand," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117905, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Shigeru Fujita & Madison Perry, 2024. "Nonworking Parents or Hungry Children," Economic Insights, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, vol. 9(4), pages 2-9, December.
    3. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2022. "Three Decades of Research on Innovation and Inequality: Causal Scenarios, Explanatory Factors, and Suggestions," Working Papers 60, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2022.
    4. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    5. David J. Deming, 2017. "The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1593-1640.
    6. Irene Brambilla, 2018. "Digital Technology Adoption and Jobs: A Model of Firm Heterogeneity," Department of Economics, Working Papers 117, Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    7. Wei Guo & Jing Wang & Yue Kang, 2024. "Internet use and inverted U-shaped employment polarization in tourism occupations," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(2), pages 457-476, March.
    8. Riccardo Leoncini, 2017. "Innovation, inequality and the skill premium," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-16, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    9. Joshua D. Hall, 2019. "Measuring the Diffusion of Technologies Through International Trade," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 25(4), pages 445-459, November.
    10. Sergey Alexeev, 2023. "Technical change and wage premiums amongst skilled labour: Evidence from the economic transition," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 189-216, January.
    11. Cheng, Can & Luo, Jiayu & Zhu, Chun & Zhang, Shangfeng, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the skill premium: A numerical analysis of theoretical models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Sergio Salgado, 2019. "Technical Change and Entrepreneurship," 2019 Meeting Papers 634, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    13. Igor Livshits & Ahmad Omar, 2024. "Missed Rent: Path to Eviction or Loan from Landlord?," Economic Insights, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, vol. 9(4), pages 10-18, December.
    14. Sabien Dobbelaere & Mark Vancauteren, 2014. "Market imperfections, skills and total factor productivity : Firm-level evidence on Belgium and the Netherlands," Working Paper Research 267, National Bank of Belgium.
    15. Fonseca, Tiago & de Faria, Pedro & Lima, Francisco, 2019. "Human capital and innovation: the importance of the optimal organizational task structure," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 616-627.
    16. Frey, Carl Benedikt & Osborne, Michael A., 2017. "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 254-280.
    17. Dawei (David) Zhang & Gang Peng & Yuliang Yao & Tyson R. Browning, 2024. "Is a College Education Still Enough? The IT-Labor Relationship with Education Level, Task Routineness, and Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 992-1010, September.
    18. Marcio Cruz & Emmanuel Milet & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2020. "Online exports and the skilled-unskilled wage gap," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, May.
    19. Falck, Oliver & Guo, Yuchen & Langer, Christina & Lindlacher, Valentin & Wiederhold, Simon, 2025. "Firm Training, Automation, and Wages: International Worker-Level Evidence," IWH Discussion Papers 27/2024, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), revised 2025.
    20. Robert Stehrer, 2022. "The Impact of ICT and Intangible Capital Accumulation on Labour Demand Growth and Functional Income Shares," wiiw Working Papers 218, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6981-:d:1129073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.