IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6193-d1115595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons Learned and Challenges of Biopesticide Usage for Locust Management—The Case of China

Author

Listed:
  • Hongmei Li

    (MARA-CABI Joint Laboratory for Bio-Safety, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100193, China
    CABI, East and South-East Asia Centre, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Mariam A. T. J. Kadzamira

    (CABI UK Centre, Egham TW20 9TY, UK)

  • Adewale Ogunmodede

    (CABI UK Centre, Egham TW20 9TY, UK)

  • Elizabeth Finch

    (CABI UK Centre, Egham TW20 9TY, UK)

  • Jingquan Zhu

    (National Agro-Tech Extension and Service Center, Beijing 100125, China)

  • Dannie Romney

    (CABI Africa Centre, Nairobi P.O. Box 633-00621, Kenya)

  • Belinda Luke

    (CABI UK Centre, Egham TW20 9TY, UK)

Abstract

Using qualitative methods, this study assessed the stakeholders and management processes involved in locust outbreaks in China, including factors influencing the use of biopesticides. Study findings show that China has an integrated national locust response protocol, which involves various institutions from all administrative levels of the government. The process is inherently highly complex but efficient, with multisectoral agencies working closely together to prevent and/or manage locust outbreaks. In addition, the process has been successful in combating recent outbreaks, due to dedicated government funding, decisive administrative and technical actions, and the empowerment of local government administration. This is the case with the county level acting as a ‘first-responder’ that is capacitated financially and technically to respond to a locust invasion in their jurisdiction. Additionally, study findings show that despite the availability of biopesticides in local markets, their use is dampened by inadequate information about market availability, negative perceptions by decision makers about their efficacy, and concerns about their costs, as well as limited knowledge of their application techniques. Actions are therefore needed by relevant authorities to enhance stakeholder awareness of biopesticide market availability, efficacy, and field application processes. Future areas of research should focus on modelling the expected impact and cost effectiveness of chemicals vs. biopesticides, thus increasing the evidence base for promoting biopesticide use.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongmei Li & Mariam A. T. J. Kadzamira & Adewale Ogunmodede & Elizabeth Finch & Jingquan Zhu & Dannie Romney & Belinda Luke, 2023. "Lessons Learned and Challenges of Biopesticide Usage for Locust Management—The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6193-:d:1115595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6193/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6193/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abubakr A. M. Salih & Marta Baraibar & Kenneth Kemucie Mwangi & Guleid Artan, 2020. "Author Correction: Climate change and locust outbreak in East Africa," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(10), pages 971-971, October.
    2. Abubakr A. M. Salih & Marta Baraibar & Kenneth Kemucie Mwangi & Guleid Artan, 2020. "Climate change and locust outbreak in East Africa," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(7), pages 584-585, July.
    3. Wilson, Clevo & Tisdell, Clem, 2001. "Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 449-462, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ke Liu & Zhenhong Qi & Li Tan & Caiyan Yang & Canwei Hu, 2023. "Mixed Use of Chemical Pesticides and Biopesticides among Rice–Crayfish Integrated System Farmers in China: A Multivariate Probit Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Landmann, Tobias & Agboka, Komi M. & Klein, Igor & Abdel-Rahman, Elfatih M. & Kimathi, Emily & Mudereri, Bester T. & Malenge, Benard & Mohamed, Mahgoub M. & Tonnang, Henri E.Z., 2023. "Towards early response to desert locust swarming in eastern Africa by estimating timing of hatching," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    2. Takahiro Nakashima & Shoko Ishikawa, 2022. "Exploring Farmers’ Expectation toward Farm-Gate Price of Rice in Japan by Positive Mathematical Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Elizabeth Presler-Marshall & Workneh Yadete & Nicola A. Jones & Yitagesu Gebreyehu, 2022. "Making the “Unthinkable” Thinkable: Fostering Sustainable Development for Youth in Ethiopia’s Lowlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Mohammad Al-Saidi & Suhair A. Gayoum Saad & Nadir Ahmed Elagib, 2023. "From scenario to mounting risks: COVID-19’s perils for development and supply security in the Sahel," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6295-6318, July.
    5. Bernard Barasa & Cosmas Walyaula Watsusi & Paul Makoba Gudoyi & Noah Lutaaya & Loy Turyabanawe Gumisiriza & John Paul Magaya, 2023. "Desert Locust Invasion in Uganda: Effects on Household Food Consumption and Effective Control Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Antoci, Angelo & Galdi, Giulio & Russu, Paolo, 2022. "Environmental degradation and comparative advantage reversal," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    7. Fetene, G.M. & Getehun, T.D., 2018. "Agricultural Technology Adoption for Food and Nutrition Security: Evidence from Ethiopia," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277332, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Ghimire, Narishwar & Woodward, Richard T., 2013. "Under- and over-use of pesticides: An international analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 73-81.
    9. Thomas Vendryes, 2014. "Peasants Against Private Property Rights: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 971-995, December.
    10. Jacquet, Florence & Butault, Jean-Pierre & Guichard, Laurence, 2011. "An economic analysis of the possibility of reducing pesticides in French field crops," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1638-1648, July.
    11. Clement A. Tisdell, 2014. "Sustainable agriculture," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz & Eric Neumayer & Matthew Agarwala (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 32, pages 517-531, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Yuichiro Amekawa & Surat Hongsibsong & Nootchakarn Sawarng & Sumeth Yadoung & Girma Gezimu Gebre, 2021. "Producers’ Perceptions of Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard and Their Pesticide Use: The Case of Q-GAP for Cabbage Farming in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    13. Chèze, Benoît & David, Maia & Martinet, Vincent, 2020. "Understanding farmers' reluctance to reduce pesticide use: A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Magrini, Marie-Benoit & Anton, Marc & Cholez, Célia & Corre-Hellou, Guenaelle & Duc, Gérard & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Pelzer, Elise & Voisin, Anne-Sophie & Walrand, Stéphane, 2016. "Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-162.
    15. Asfaw, Solomon & Mithofer, Dagmar & Waibel, Hermann, 2008. "EU private agrifood standards in African high-value crops: pesticide use and farm-level productivity," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44145, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Aparna Rao & Risa Morimoto, 2020. "An Analysis of the use of Chemical Pesticides and their Impact on Yields, Farmer Income and Agricultural Sustainability: The Case for Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia," Working Papers 234, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    17. Margaux Lapierre & Alexandre Sauquet & Julie Subervie, 2019. "Providing technical assistance to peer networks to reduce pesticide use in Europe: Evidence from the French Ecophyto plan," Working Papers hal-02190979, HAL.
    18. Shuo Lei & Lu Zhang & Chunfei Hou & Yongwei Han, 2023. "Internet Use, Subjective Well-Being, and Environmentally Friendly Practices in Rural China: An Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    19. Hemant G. Tripathi & Harriet E. Smith & Steven M. Sait & Susannah M. Sallu & Stephen Whitfield & Astrid Jankielsohn & William E. Kunin & Ndumiso Mazibuko & Bonani Nyhodo, 2021. "Impacts of COVID-19 on Diverse Farm Systems in Tanzania and South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Korir, Josphat Kiplang'at, 2016. "Factors Influencing Intensity Of Adoption Of Integrated Pest Management Package And Pesticide Misuse In The Control Of Mango Fruit Fly In Embu East Sub-County, Kenya," Research Theses 276445, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6193-:d:1115595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.