IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6018-d1112136.html

Switch or Stay? Applying a Push–Pull–Mooring Framework to Evaluate Behavior in E-Grocery Shopping

Author

Listed:
  • Terrylina A. Monoarfa

    (Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia)

  • Ujang Sumarwan

    (Department of Family and Consumer Science, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Arif I. Suroso

    (School of Business, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Ririn Wulandari

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta 11650, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study investigates the antecedents of the intention to switch to e-grocery shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic, which is critical in recommending that e-grocery shopping service providers improve their competitiveness by responding to customer expectations. This study proposes a push–pull–mooring framework to describe the influence of dissatisfaction on the physical market, the attractiveness of e-grocery, and switching costs as factors that drive switching intentions. This study surveyed 252 Indonesians aware of the existence of an e-grocery mobile application, and applied structural equation modeling as an analytical method to explain causal relationships between variables thought to influence switching intentions to e-grocery shopping. The results showed that the attractiveness of e-grocery had a significant effect on switching intention. Likewise, switching costs ultimately drive customer intention to switch to e-grocery shopping. However, dissatisfaction is not a driving factor directly affecting switching costs and intentions. Finally, e-grocery services cannot replace the local tradition of Indonesian people who prefer to shop for groceries in physical markets. Nevertheless, these findings provide theoretical and practical contributions to retail grocery businesses that have integrated conventional and digital services as a future strategy that drives business sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Terrylina A. Monoarfa & Ujang Sumarwan & Arif I. Suroso & Ririn Wulandari, 2023. "Switch or Stay? Applying a Push–Pull–Mooring Framework to Evaluate Behavior in E-Grocery Shopping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6018-:d:1112136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6018/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6018/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moh Farid Najib & Adila Sosianika, 2018. "Retail service quality scale in the context of Indonesian traditional market," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(1), pages 19-31.
    2. Clulow, Valerie & Reimers, Vaughan, 2009. "How do consumers define retail centre convenience?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 125-132.
    3. Driediger, Fabian & Bhatiasevi, Veera, 2019. "Online grocery shopping in Thailand: Consumer acceptance and usage behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 224-237.
    4. Singh, Reema & Rosengren, Sara, 2020. "Why do online grocery shoppers switch? An empirical investigation of drivers of switching in online grocery," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Elahe Kordi Ghasrodashti, 2018. "Explaining brand switching behavior using pull–push–mooring theory and the theory of reasoned action," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 293-304, July.
    6. Midgley, David F & Dowling, Grahame R, 1978. "Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(4), pages 229-242, March.
    7. Suk Won Lee & Hye Jin Sung & Hyeon Mo Jeon, 2019. "Determinants of Continuous Intention on Food Delivery Apps: Extending UTAUT2 with Information Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Umair Akram & Melinda Timea Fülöp & Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Dan Ioan Topor & Sorinel Căpușneanu, 2021. "Impact of Digitalization on Customers’ Well-Being in the Pandemic Period: Challenges and Opportunities for the Retail Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Xuhui Wang & Frida Pacho & Jia Liu & Redempta Kajungiro, 2019. "Factors Influencing Organic Food Purchase Intention in Developing Countries and the Moderating Role of Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Yokoyama, Narimasa & Azuma, Nobukazu & Kim, Woonho, 2022. "Moderating effect of customer's retail format perception on customer satisfaction formation: An empirical study of mini-supermarkets in an urban retail market setting," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Mariantonietta Fiore & Antonino Galati, 2020. "How the Covid-19 Pandemic Is Changing Online Food Shopping Human Behaviour in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Léon Van Hove, 2021. "Adoption and usage of E-grocery shopping: A context-specific UTAUT2 model," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/324918, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    14. Maruyama, Masayoshi & Wu, Lihui & Huang, Lin, 2016. "The modernization of fresh food retailing in China: The role of consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 33-39.
    15. Kuo, Ren-Zong, 2020. "Why do people switch mobile payment service platforms? An empirical study in Taiwan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Birch, Dawn & Memery, Juliet & De Silva Kanakaratne, Maheshan, 2018. "The mindful consumer: Balancing egoistic and altruistic motivations to purchase local food," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 221-228.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zihan Guan & Xiaoran Shi & Huajing Ying & Ruhui Xue & Xiaojiao Qiao, 2024. "An empirical study on traditional offline retailer’s switching intention towards community-based group buying program: A push–pull-mooring model," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Mohamad Shahril Mohamad Besir & Saadiah Juliana Saadun & Siti Noraini Mohd. Tobi & Nor Zaihan Mat Hasan & Mohd Faris Fikri, 2024. "Help! I Have Been Thinking to Do It Lately: Workplace Mistreatment and Suicidal Ideation Among Internship Students in Klang Valley," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(3), pages 776-786.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khalek, Sk Abu & Dey, Debasmita & Chakraborty, Anirban & Samanta, Tamal, 2025. "“From expectations to frustrations†: Dissecting negative experiences to understand negative word-of-mouth in online grocery services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Mariantonietta Fiore & Antonino Galati, 2020. "How the Covid-19 Pandemic Is Changing Online Food Shopping Human Behaviour in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Alaimo, Leonardo Salvatore & Fiore, Mariantonietta & Galati, Antonino, 2022. "Measuring consumers’ level of satisfaction for online food shopping during COVID-19 in Italy using POSETs," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    4. Soyoung An & Thomas Eck & Huirang Yim, 2023. "Understanding Consumers’ Acceptance Intention to Use Mobile Food Delivery Applications through an Extended Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Hasan Al-Banna & Izra Berakon, 2024. "From bank to P2P lending: switching intention of SME’s: evidence from Indonesia," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 568-581, June.
    6. Natarajan, Thamaraiselvan & Balasubramanian, Senthil Arasu & Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2017. "Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 8-22.
    7. Arias-Oliva, Mario & Pelegrín-Borondo, Jorge & Lara-Palma, Ana María & Juaneda-Ayensa, Emma, 2020. "Emerging cyborg products: An ethical market approach for market segmentation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    8. Simone Braun & Dunia Osman, 2024. "Online grocery shopping adoption versus non-adoption among the over-50s in Germany," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 825-862, June.
    9. Gyutae Lee & Yunsik Kim, 2022. "Effects of Resistance Barriers to Service Robots on Alternative Attractiveness and Intention to Use," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    10. Kumar, Avinash & Chakraborty, Shibashish & Bala, Pradip Kumar, 2023. "Text mining approach to explore determinants of grocery mobile app satisfaction using online customer reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Siyu Gao & Bilin Shao, 2022. "Why Do Consumers Switch to Biodegradable Plastic Consumption? The Effect of Push, Pull and Mooring on the Plastic Consumption Intention of Young Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Léon Van Hove, 2021. "Adoption and usage of E-grocery shopping: A context-specific UTAUT2 model," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/324918, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Pranpreya Sriwannawit & Ulf Sandström, 2015. "Large-scale bibliometric review of diffusion research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1615-1645, February.
    14. Frishammar, Johan & Essén, Anna & Bergström, Frida & Ekman, Tilda, 2023. "Digital health platforms for the elderly? Key adoption and usage barriers and ways to address them," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    15. Mohamed Bouteraa & Brahim Chekima & Nelson Lajuni & Ayesha Anwar, 2023. "Understanding Consumers’ Barriers to Using FinTech Services in the United Arab Emirates: Mixed-Methods Research Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Kita, Pavol & Čvirik, Marián, 2024. "Retailer processes centred on the food market as the main determinate of business models in the context of retail size," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Iwona Kowalczuk & Dagmara Stangierska & Jerzy Gębski & Agnieszka Tul-Krzyszczuk & Edyta Zmudczyńska, 2021. "Digital Consumers in the Foodservices Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Eun-Jung Kim & Jinkyung Jenny Kim & Sang-Ho Han, 2021. "Understanding Student Acceptance of Online Learning Systems in Higher Education: Application of Social Psychology Theories with Consideration of User Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    19. Elodie Attié & Lars Meyer-Waarden, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy calculus theories," Post-Print hal-04065165, HAL.
    20. Ioanna Roussou & Emmanouil Stiakakis & Angelo Sifaleras, 2019. "An empirical study on the commercial adoption of digital currencies," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 223-259, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6018-:d:1112136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.