IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5729-d1106745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Residential Parking Policy Derogations on Sustainability of Streets: The Case of Gaziantep, Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Şafak Hengirmen Tercan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gaziantep Campus, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep 27100, Türkiye)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization causes severe parking problems in developing cities. Parking policies cannot be strictly applied in some cases because of varying claims by developers. The variables such as household density, car ownership, and availability of public transport, and the new challenges such as sustainability, climate change, and sustainable mobility still remain insignificant in parking policies. The appropriate parking policies are immediately needed; however, the question is “which policy is appropriate for which city?” In this study, the evolution of residential parking policies is analyzed through the policy analysis process and parking survey methods. In conclusion, maintaining the status quo and not monitoring the applied policy results during the peak period of urbanization caused an irreversible spillover problem. In particular, some exemptions, such as the derogation payment and lack of public district parking lots, increased the pressure on the on-street parking capacity and sustainability of streets. A case study parking survey in a large-city center shows that parking demand is exceeding the capacity by 166% for average daily occupancy on weekdays and 111% on weekends in 2022, compared to 61% in 2015. Five policy alternatives are developed and the “zone parking policy” is concluded to be the most appropriate one for districts while the “mobility level of zones” needs more action at the city level.

Suggested Citation

  • Şafak Hengirmen Tercan, 2023. "Effect of Residential Parking Policy Derogations on Sustainability of Streets: The Case of Gaziantep, Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5729-:d:1106745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5729/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5729/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Zhan, 2013. "Does residential parking supply affect household car ownership? The case of New York City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 18-28.
    2. Mingardo, Giuliano & van Wee, Bert & Rye, Tom, 2015. "Urban parking policy in Europe: A conceptualization of past and possible future trends," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 268-281.
    3. Marsden, Greg, 2006. "The evidence base for parking policies--a review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 447-457, November.
    4. Weinberger, Rachel, 2012. "Death by a thousand curb-cuts: Evidence on the effect of minimum parking requirements on the choice to drive," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 93-102.
    5. Guo, Zhan, 2013. "Home parking convenience, household car usage, and implications to residential parking policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 97-106.
    6. Manville, Michael & Shoup, Donald C, 2010. "Parking requirements as a barrier to housing development: regulation and reform in Los Angeles," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1qr84990, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Paul A. Barter, 2015. "A parking policy typology for clearer thinking on parking reform," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 136-156, July.
    8. Taylor, Elizabeth Jean, 2020. "Parking policy: The politics and uneven use of residential parking space in Melbourne," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Wang, James J. & Liu, Qian, 2014. "Understanding the parking supply mechanism in China: a case study of Shenzhen," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 77-88.
    10. Banister, David, 2008. "The sustainable mobility paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 73-80, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tanase Tasente & Mari-Isabella Stan, 2023. "Collaborative Parking Management in Constanta: The Role of Public Policies and Citizen Participation," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 43(1), pages 37-54, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qian Liu & James Wang & Peng Chen & Zuopeng Xiao, 2017. "How does parking interplay with the built environment and affect automobile commuting in high-density cities? A case study in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(14), pages 3299-3317, November.
    2. Qian Liu & Mingjian Zhu & Zuopeng Xiao, 2019. "Workplace Parking Provision and Built Environments: Improving Context-Specific Parking Standards Towards Sustainable Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Anna Lower & Agnieszka Szumilas, 2021. "Parking Policy as a Tool of Sustainable Mobility-Parking Standards in Poland vs. European Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. De Gruyter, Chris & Davies, Liam & Truong, Long T., 2021. "Examining spatial variations in minimum residential parking requirements in Melbourne," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Christiansen, Petter & Engebretsen, Øystein & Fearnley, Nils & Usterud Hanssen, Jan, 2017. "Parking facilities and the built environment: Impacts on travel behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 198-206.
    6. McAslan, Devon & Sprei, Frances, 2023. "Minimum parking requirements and car ownership: An analysis of Swedish municipalities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 45-58.
    7. Taylor, Elizabeth Jean, 2020. "Parking policy: The politics and uneven use of residential parking space in Melbourne," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Brudner, Amir, 2023. "On the management of residential on-street parking: Policies and repercussions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 94-107.
    9. Scheiner, Joachim & Faust, Nico & Helmer, Johannes & Straub, Michael & Holz-Rau, Christian, 2020. "What's that garage for? Private parking and on-street parking in a high-density urban residential neighbourhood," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Selzer, Sina, 2021. "Car-reduced neighborhoods as blueprints for the transition toward an environmentally friendly urban transport system? A comparison of narratives and mobility-related practices in two case studies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. De Gruyter, Chris & Truong, Long T. & Taylor, Elizabeth J., 2020. "Can high quality public transport support reduced car parking requirements for new residential apartments?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Frances Sprei & Cecilia Hult & Åsa Hult & Anders Roth, 2020. "Review of the Effects of Developments with Low Parking Requirements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, February.
    13. De Gruyter, Chris & Hooper, Paula & Foster, Sarah, 2023. "Do apartment residents have enough car parking? An empirical assessment of car parking adequacy in Australian cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Wang, James J. & Liu, Qian, 2014. "Understanding the parking supply mechanism in China: a case study of Shenzhen," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 77-88.
    15. Zhong Wang & Rui Xu, 2022. "Price Controls and Platform Ecosystem: A Comparative Analysis of Parking Applications between Beijing and London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Budnitz, Hannah & Meelen, Toon & Schwanen, Tim, 2022. "Residential Neighbourhood Charging of Electric Vehicles: an exploration of user preferences," SocArXiv fsv7n, Center for Open Science.
    17. Thumm, Alex Jürgen & Perl, Anthony, 2020. "Puzzling over parking: Assessing the transitional parking requirement in Vancouver, British Columbia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 85-101.
    18. Albalate, Daniel & Gragera, Albert, 2020. "The impact of curbside parking regulations on car ownership," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Weite Lu & Chunqin Zhang & Xunyou Ni & Haiqiang Liu, 2020. "Do the Elderly Need Wider Parking Spaces? Evidence from Experimental and Questionnaire Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Taylor, Dr Elizabeth, 2021. "Free parking for free people: German road laws and rights as constraints on local car parking management," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 23-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5729-:d:1106745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.