IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4386-d1084554.html

Communicating Moral Responsibility: Stakeholder Capitalism, Types, and Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Saheli Goswami

    (Department of Textiles, Fashion Merchandising and Design, College of Business, University of Rhode Island, 55 Lower College Road, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Gargi Bhaduri

    (Shannon Rogers and Jerry Silverman School of Fashion Merchandising and Design, Kent State University, 218 H Rockwell Hall, Kent, OH 44242, USA)

Abstract

With stakeholder capitalism being the new mantra for corporate moral responsibility, the question of how corporations’ moral commitments inconsistent with their executions would variably influence internal and external stakeholders and for different types of stakeholder capitalism issues remains unanswered. Using a 2 (inconsistency: present/absent) × 2 (stakeholder: internal/external) × 5 (stakeholder-capitalism issues: worker/environment/shareholder/customer/community) between-subjects experiment, this study investigated the variable impact on stakeholders’ corporate hypocrisy perceptions. With data collected from 1296 U.S. stakeholders, ANOVA results revealed that corporate moral responsibility messages-action inconsistency generates hypocrisy among stakeholders such that external stakeholders, namely consumers, experienced higher hypocrisy than internal ones, namely employees. The context of corporate moral responsibility (i.e., the types of stakeholder-capitalism issues) did not moderate resulting perceptions, but these issues directly impacted hypocrisy perceptions. These perceptions varied between external and internal stakeholders for different issues; the highest hypocrisy was recorded for shareholders and workers issues. Thus, the focus of this research was foregrounded on corporations’ moral responsibilities perceived as inconsistent with their execution to present a comparative analysis of different groups of stakeholders’ responses and devise effective solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Saheli Goswami & Gargi Bhaduri, 2023. "Communicating Moral Responsibility: Stakeholder Capitalism, Types, and Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4386-:d:1084554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babu, Nishat & De Roeck, Kenneth & Raineri, Nicolas, 2020. "Hypocritical organizations: Implications for employee social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 376-384.
    2. Lee, Eun Mi & Park, Seong-Yeon & Rapert, Molly I. & Newman, Christopher L., 2012. "Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1558-1564.
    3. Hanna Kim & Won-Moo Hur & Junsang Yeo, 2015. "Corporate Brand Trust as a Mediator in the Relationship between Consumer Perception of CSR, Corporate Hypocrisy, and Corporate Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Rachel LoMonaco-Benzing & Jung Ha-Brookshire, 2016. "Sustainability as Social Contract: Textile and Apparel Professionals’ Value Conflicts within the Corporate Moral Responsibility Spectrum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Jung Ha-Brookshire, 2017. "Toward Moral Responsibility Theories of Corporate Sustainability and Sustainable Supply Chain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 227-237, October.
    6. Yi-Ping Chang & Hsiu-Hua Hu & Chih-Ming Lin, 2021. "Consistency or Hypocrisy? The Impact of Internal Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Qing Miao & Jun Zhou, 2020. "Corporate Hypocrisy and Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Identification and Perceived Importance of CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Gideon Markman & Dan Krause, 2014. "Special Topic Forum on Theory Building Surrounding Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(3), pages 1-1, July.
    9. Appel Mahmud & Donghong Ding & Md. Morshadul Hasan, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    10. Sabrina Scheidler & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Jelena Spanjol & Jan Wieseke, 2019. "Scrooge Posing as Mother Teresa: How Hypocritical Social Responsibility Strategies Hurt Employees and Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 339-358, June.
    11. Jakob, Michael & Kübler, Dorothea & Steckel, Jan Christoph & van Veldhuizen, Roel, 2017. "Clean up your own mess: An experimental study of moral responsibility and efficiency," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 138-146.
    12. Wagner, Tillmann & Korschun, Daniel & Troebs, Cord-Christian, 2020. "Deconstructing corporate hypocrisy: A delineation of its behavioral, moral, and attributional facets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 385-394.
    13. Saheli Goswami & Jung Ha-Brookshire & Wes Bonifay, 2018. "Measuring Perceived Corporate Hypocrisy: Scale Development in the Context of U.S. Retail Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Gideon Markman & Dan Krause, 2014. "Special Topic Forum on Theory Building Surrounding Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(4), pages 100-101, October.
    15. Melea Press & Eric J. Arnould, 2011. "How Does Organizational Identification Form? A Consumer Behavior Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(4), pages 650-666.
    16. Nishat Babu & Kenneth de Roeck & Nicolas Raineri, 2020. "Hypocritical organizations: Implications for employee social responsibility," Post-Print hal-03796007, HAL.
    17. Hua Jiang & Yang Cheng & Keonyoung Park & Wei Zhu, 2022. "Linking CSR Communication to Corporate Reputation: Understanding Hypocrisy, Employees’ Social Media Engagement and CSR-Related Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacobs, Nele & Swoboda, Bernhard, 2025. "How perceived stakeholder orientations affect consumers’ perceived firm innovativeness across nations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cen April Yue & Baobao Song & Weiting Tao & Minjeong Kang, 2024. "Irresponsible to others but responsible to me: Testing employees' responses to external corporate social irresponsibility and internal corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5427-5445, November.
    2. Jintao Lu & Chunyan Wang & Dima Jamali & Yangyang Gao & Chong Zhang & Mengshang Liang, 2022. "A novel framework to unearth corporate hypocrisy: Connotation, formation mechanism, manifestation, and contagion effect," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 1136-1156, October.
    3. Zhibin Tao & Jiaxiao Chao, 2024. "Unveiling the influence of corporate greenwashing on employees' pro‐environmental behavior: A cross‐cultural study from China, United Kingdom, Republic of Korea, and Japan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 6103-6130, November.
    4. Asif Nawaz & Shuaib Ahmed Soomro & Qurat‐ul‐ain Talpur, 2026. "Environmental Actions and Leadership Integrity: Unpacking Symbolic and Substantive Pro‐Environmental Behavior Impact on Organizational Perception," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 3-16, January.
    5. M. M. Sulphey & K. Mohamed Jasim, 2025. "Can Paradoxical Leadership Revert Silence Imposed by Corporate Hypocrisy and Organizational Inertia Bring in Voice Behavior: An Examination Using SEM," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
    6. Kenneth de Roeck & Nicolas Raineri & David Jones & Sabrina Scheidler, 2024. "Giving the benefit of the doubt: Investigating the insurance-like effect of CSR in mitigating negative employee reactions to psychological contract breach," Post-Print hal-04238140, HAL.
    7. Maria Jose Murcia & Maria Dolores del Rio & Maria Carmela Annosi, 2025. "The Procession Goes Inside: Employees' Dissonance Reduction Strategies in Response to Corporate Hypocrisy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 6106-6119, September.
    8. Yiming Wang & Yuhua Xie & Mingwei Liu & Yongxing Guo & Duojun He, 2024. "Silent Majority: How Employees’ Perceptions of Corporate Hypocrisy are Related to their Silence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 315-334, November.
    9. Juhua Xu & Eun-Kyoung Han, 2021. "How Temporal Order of Inconsistent CSR Information Affects Consumer Perceptions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Nie, Jun & Song, Tiannuo & Qian, Xinyi, 2025. "Does corporate social responsibility gap hinder corporate innovation?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Lucas Amaral Lauriano & Juliane Reinecke & Michael Etter, 2022. "When Aspirational Talk Backfires: The Role of Moral Judgements in Employees’ Hypocrisy Interpretation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(4), pages 827-845, December.
    12. Xingqiang Du & Yiqi Zhang & Shaojuan Lai & Hexin Tao, 2024. "How Do Auditors Value Hypocrisy? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(3), pages 501-533, May.
    13. Xiang, Yilin & Chen, Lu & Zhang, Zhenya & Sun, Xinyu, 2024. "Does perceived greenwashing promote or inhibit ethical voice? Effects of moral disengagement and perceived competitive pressure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Priyanka Aggarwal & Reetesh Kumar Singh, 2022. "Synthesizing the affinity between employees' internal‐external CSR perceptions and work outcomes: A meta‐analytic investigation," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 1053-1101, October.
    15. Jennifer L. Robertson & A. Wren Montgomery & Timur Ozbilir, 2023. "Employees' response to corporate greenwashing," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4015-4027, November.
    16. Renxiang He & Hongtao Chen & Xiang Zhu, 2025. "Corporate hypocrisy and ESG rating divergence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 1122-1146, January.
    17. Hong‐yan Li & Xianxian Duan & Qiang Fu, 2025. "Enhancing organizational attractiveness through CSR consistency: Examining the impact of corporate hypocrisy, conceptual fluency, and proactive communication in HR recruitment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 253-268, January.
    18. Hongdan Zhao & Jing Xu & Yuanhua Chen & Wenyuan Sun, 2020. "The Employee Attributions of Corporate Hypocrisy in Corporate Social Responsibility: An Explore Research Based on Grounded Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    19. Nawaz, Asif & Gilal, Faheem Gul & Channa, Khalil Ahmed & Gilal, Rukhsana Gul, 2023. "Going deep into a leader's integrity: A systematic review and the way forward," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 845-863.
    20. Yasser Yassin & Markus Beckmann, 2025. "CSR and employee outcomes: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 595-641, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4386-:d:1084554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.