IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3467-d1067699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advances in Agroindustrial Waste as a Substrate for Obtaining Eco-Friendly Microbial Products

Author

Listed:
  • Álvaro Astudillo

    (Doctoral Program in Sciences of Natural Resources, University of La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile)

  • Olga Rubilar

    (Chemical Engineering Department, University of La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4780000, Chile
    Biotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4780000, Chile)

  • Gabriela Briceño

    (Biotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4780000, Chile)

  • María Cristina Diez

    (Chemical Engineering Department, University of La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4780000, Chile
    Biotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4780000, Chile)

  • Heidi Schalchli

    (Biotechnological Research Center Applied to the Environment (CIBAMA-BIOREN), University of La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4780000, Chile)

Abstract

Recycled agroindustrial waste has been of great interest during the last decade as a low-cost and sustainable substrate for fermentation processes. The types of products, yields, and potential applications depend mainly on the waste composition, which varies in terms of proteins, carbohydrates, and/or polyphenolic compounds. The most commonly reported microbial products are enzymes, pigments, biosurfactants, antibiotics, and phenolic compounds for different industrial applications. Advances in research on novel wastes as nutrient sources and the optimization of fermentation processes can help these materials transition from laboratory applications to an industrial level. This review explores reports published in the last five years (2017–2022) on different types of agroindustrial waste and their utilization in the production of useful microbial products. The present scenario and future scope of agroindustrial waste as substrates for submerged and solid-state fermentation processes are also discussed. The information was analyzed considering two main topics: (i) agroindustrial waste as substrates for fermentation processes and (ii) high-added value products obtained by microbial conversion. This review contributes to future research endeavors to discover the key factors that will allow us to reach the market with sustainable microbial products.

Suggested Citation

  • Álvaro Astudillo & Olga Rubilar & Gabriela Briceño & María Cristina Diez & Heidi Schalchli, 2023. "Advances in Agroindustrial Waste as a Substrate for Obtaining Eco-Friendly Microbial Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3467-:d:1067699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander, Peter & Brown, Calum & Arneth, Almut & Finnigan, John & Moran, Dominic & Rounsevell, Mark D.A., 2017. "Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 190-200.
    2. Barros, Murillo Vetroni & Salvador, Rodrigo & de Francisco, Antonio Carlos & Piekarski, Cassiano Moro, 2020. "Mapping of research lines on circular economy practices in agriculture: From waste to energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandra Sophia Lozano Pérez & Valentina Romero Mahecha & Carlos Alberto Guerrero Fajardo, 2025. "Hydrothermal Valorization of Peapods and Coffee Cherry Waste: Comparative Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Acid Catalysis and Evaluation of Biomass’ Influence on Catalytic Efficiency," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Daniela-Mihaela Grigore & Maria-Luiza Mircea & Elena Narcisa Pogurschi, 2025. "Toward Sustainable Broiler Production: Evaluating Microbial Protein as Supplementation for Conventional Feed Proteins," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed, Kamaldeen & Batung, Evans & Kansanga, Moses Mosonsieyiri & Luginaah, Isaac, 2024. "Alcohol misuse as a social determinant of food insecurity among smallholder farmers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    2. Rodrigo Salvador & Reinalda Blanco Pereira & Gabriel Fernandes Sales & Vanessa Campana Vergani Oliveira & Anthony Halog & Antonio C. Francisco, 2022. "Current Panorama, Practice Gaps, and Recommendations to Accelerate the Transition to a Circular Bioeconomy in Latin America and the Caribbean," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 281-312, March.
    3. Aurélie Bechoff & Apurba Shee & Brighton M. Mvumi & Patrick Ngwenyama & Hawi Debelo & Mario G. Ferruzzi & Loveness K. Nyanga & Sarah Mayanja & Keith I. Tomlins, 2022. "Estimation of nutritional postharvest losses along food value chains: A case study of three key food security commodities in sub-Saharan Africa," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(3), pages 571-590, June.
    4. Rachel Mazac & Kajsa Resare Sahlin & Iisa Hyypiä & Fanny Keränen & Mari Niva & Nora Berglund & Iryna Herzon, 2025. "Does “better” mean “less”? Sustainable meat consumption in the context of natural pasture-raised beef," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 1637-1651, September.
    5. Silvio Franco & Clara Cicatiello, 2018. "Food waste due to over-nutrition in the Italians? dietary habits," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 159-180.
    6. Bernhard Wohner & Erik Pauer & Victoria Heinrich & Manfred Tacker, 2019. "Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste: An Overview of Drivers and Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Nan-Hua Nadja Yang & Ana Carolina Bertassini & Jéssica Alves Justo Mendes & Mateus Cecílio Gerolamo, 2021. "The ‘3CE2CE’ Framework—Change Management Towards a Circular Economy: Opportunities for Agribusiness," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 697-718, September.
    8. Ji-Qin Ren & Ya-Wen Yang & Yuan-Ying Chi, 2022. "Research on Straw-Based High-Quality Energy in China under the Background of Carbon Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    9. van Dooren, C. & Keuchenius, C. & de Vries, J.H.M. & de Boer, J. & Aiking, H., 2018. "Unsustainable dietary habits of specific subgroups require dedicated transition strategies: Evidence from the Netherlands," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 44-57.
    10. Rudolf Messner & Carol Richards & Hope Johnson, 2020. "The “Prevention Paradox”: food waste prevention and the quandary of systemic surplus production," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(3), pages 805-817, September.
    11. Kirsty Joanna Blair & Dominic Moran & Peter Alexander, 2024. "Worldviews, values and perspectives towards the future of the livestock sector," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(1), pages 91-108, March.
    12. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić, 2021. "Innovative circular business models in the olive oil sector for sustainable mediterranean agrifood systems," Post-Print hal-03158870, HAL.
    13. Min, Shi & Wang, Xiaobing & Yu, Xiaohua, 2021. "Does dietary knowledge affect household food waste in the developing economy of China?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Yue, Qiong & Guo, Ping & Wu, Hui & Wang, Youzhi & Zhang, Chenglong, 2022. "Towards sustainable circular agriculture: An integrated optimization framework for crop-livestock-biogas-crop recycling system management under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. He Zhang & Ashish Asutosh & Wei Hu, 2018. "Implementing Vertical Farming at University Scale to Promote Sustainable Communities: A Feasibility Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Jessica Aschemann‐Witzel & Ana Giménez & Alice Grønhøj & Gastón Ares, 2020. "Avoiding household food waste, one step at a time: The role of self‐efficacy, convenience orientation, and the good provider identity in distinct situational contexts," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 581-606, June.
    17. Sabrina Arcuri, 2019. "Food poverty, food waste and the consensus frame on charitable food redistribution in Italy," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 263-275, June.
    18. Ramezani, Mohammad & Khazaei, Moein & Gholian-Jouybari, Fatemeh & Sandoval-Correa, Alejandro & Bonakdari, Hossein & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2024. "Turquoise hydrogen and waste optimization: A Bi-objective closed-loop and sustainable supply chain model for a case in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. repec:ags:areint:341531 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. G. Venkatesh, 2022. "Circular Bio-economy—Paradigm for the Future: Systematic Review of Scientific Journal Publications from 2015 to 2021," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 231-279, March.
    21. Antonis V. Papadopoulos & Dionissios P. Kalivas, 2021. "Assessing Soil and Crop Characteristics at Sub-Field Level Using Unmanned Aerial System and Geospatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3467-:d:1067699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.