IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2855-d511809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Soil and Crop Characteristics at Sub-Field Level Using Unmanned Aerial System and Geospatial Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Antonis V. Papadopoulos

    (Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Scientific Directorate of Phytopathology, Laboratory of Non-Parasitic Diseases, Kifissia, 14561 Athens, Greece)

  • Dionissios P. Kalivas

    (Department of Natural Resource Management & Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Practicing agriculture is a multiparametric and for this reason demanding task. It involves the management of many factors and thorough strategic planning in a highly variable and uncertain environment. Crop production is a function of agricultural practices as applied in natural resources, such as soil and plants. When referring to conventional agriculture, variability in these resources is neglected, as any field is treated homogenously. On the other hand, site-specific crop management, which was promoted through the advance of technologies, regarding collecting and analyzing data and applying agricultural decisions at a sub-field level, considers field spatial and temporal variations. Localizing inputs in a field rationalizes agricultural waste management and offers promising perspectives towards a circular economy. In this context, two cotton fields in central Greece were selected for this study. During the growing period, reflectance data were acquired, before planting at the end of April, and 100 days after planting at the end of July, with a commercial unmanned aerial system (UAS). The fields were grid sampled for soil (clay content, pH, calcium carbonate percentage, organic matter, total nitrogen, and electrical conductivity) and plant properties (total nitrogen, potassium, iron, copper, and zinc) determination. All data were manipulated through geographical information systems (GIS) and further participated in principal component analysis (PCA) application. PCA revealed important relations and groupings between soil reflectance and organic matter, carbonates, and clay content in both fields (72 to 87% of the total variance in the initial parameters was explained by the extracted components). However, in plant data, the resulting components accounted for less variability in initial data (62 to 72%). PCA resulting scores were introduced in the Fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm, which categorized sub-areas of the fields into two discrete zones per field. Zoning, in the case of soil properties, was accompanied with the statistically important ( p < 0.01) discrimination of the mean values (except for total nitrogen and pH), implicating a promising zonal management scheme. The zone delineation process regarding plant properties yielded areas that did not share statistically significant variations, except for the mean values of iron concentration ( p < 0.01). According to the results, spatial variations were revealed across the fields, mostly in soil properties, which can be directly monitored through aerial reflectance data. The applied methodology can be used in extension services or by agronomists for producing fertilizer application maps. Further, when integrated with a broader spatial decision support system, it can be used by policy makers for adapting circular economy strategies in crop production.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonis V. Papadopoulos & Dionissios P. Kalivas, 2021. "Assessing Soil and Crop Characteristics at Sub-Field Level Using Unmanned Aerial System and Geospatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2855-:d:511809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2855/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2855/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed S. Metwally & Sameh M. Shaddad & Manqiang Liu & Rong-Jiang Yao & Ahmed I. Abdo & Peng Li & Jiaoguo Jiao & Xiaoyun Chen, 2019. "Soil Properties Spatial Variability and Delineation of Site-Specific Management Zones Based on Soil Fertility Using Fuzzy Clustering in a Hilly Field in Jianyang, Sichuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Sanaz Shafian & Nithya Rajan & Ronnie Schnell & Muthukumar Bagavathiannan & John Valasek & Yeyin Shi & Jeff Olsenholler, 2018. "Unmanned aerial systems-based remote sensing for monitoring sorghum growth and development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Lichtenberg, Erik, 2002. "Agriculture and the environment," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 23, pages 1249-1313, Elsevier.
    4. Korhonen, Jouni & Honkasalo, Antero & Seppälä, Jyri, 2018. "Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 37-46.
    5. Madhu Khanna & Onesime Faustin Epouhe & Robert Hornbaker, 1999. "Site-Specific Crop Management: Adoption Patterns and Incentives," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 455-472.
    6. Barros, Murillo Vetroni & Salvador, Rodrigo & de Francisco, Antonio Carlos & Piekarski, Cassiano Moro, 2020. "Mapping of research lines on circular economy practices in agriculture: From waste to energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gheorghe-Gavrilă Hognogi & Ana-Maria Pop & Alexandra-Camelia Marian-Potra & Tania Someșfălean, 2021. "The Role of UAS–GIS in Digital Era Governance. A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-31, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mechthild Donner & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "How to innovate business models for a circular bio‐economy?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1932-1947, May.
    2. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    3. Brausmann, Alexandra & Bretschger, Lucas, 2018. "Economic development on a finite planet with stochastic soil degradation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-19.
    4. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2021. "Cradle to Cradle is a Sustainable Economic Policy for the Better Future," MPRA Paper 111334, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Oct 2021.
    5. B Kelsey Jack, "undated". "Market Inefficiencies and the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies in Developing Countries," CID Working Papers 50, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    6. Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles & Janaina Mascarenhas & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & Adriana Hoffman Trevisan, 2022. "Smoothing the circular economy transition: The role of resources and capabilities enablers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1814-1837, May.
    7. Ephrem Habyarimana & Faheem S Baloch, 2021. "Machine learning models based on remote and proximal sensing as potential methods for in-season biomass yields prediction in commercial sorghum fields," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Davide Bruno & Marinella Ferrara & Felice D’Alessandro & Alberto Mandelli, 2022. "The Role of Design in the CE Transition of the Furniture Industry—The Case of the Italian Company Cassina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Monia Niero & Charlotte L. Jensen & Chiara Farné Fratini & Jens Dorland & Michael S. Jørgensen & Susse Georg, 2021. "Is life cycle assessment enough to address unintended side effects from Circular Economy initiatives?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1111-1120, October.
    10. Nathan D. DeLay & Nathanael M. Thompson & James R. Mintert, 2022. "Precision agriculture technology adoption and technical efficiency," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 195-219, February.
    11. Francesca Gennari, 2023. "The transition towards a circular economy. A framework for SMEs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1423-1457, December.
    12. Gregory S. Amacher & Erkki Koskela & Markku Ollikainen, 2004. "Deforestation, Production Intensity and Land Use under Insecure Property Rights," CESifo Working Paper Series 1128, CESifo.
    13. Jaroslaw Golebiewski & Josu Takala & Oskar Juszczyk & Nina Drejerska, 2019. "Local contribution to circular economy. A case study of a Polish rural municipality," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(3), pages 771-791.
    14. Millar, Neal & McLaughlin, Eoin & Börger, Tobias, 2019. "The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 11-19.
    15. D. D’Amato, 2021. "Sustainability Narratives as Transformative Solution Pathways: Zooming in on the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    16. Li Yu & Peter F. Orazem, 2014. "O-Ring production on U.S. hog farms: joint choices of farm size, technology, and compensation," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(4), pages 431-442, July.
    17. Nikos Chatzistamoulou & Phoebe Koundouri, 2020. "The Economics of Sustainable Development," DEOS Working Papers 2005, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    18. Halkos, George & Managi, Shunsuke, 2023. "New developments in the disciplines of environmental and resource economics," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 513-522.
    19. Larson, James A. & English, Burton C. & Roberts, Roland K. & Cochran, Rebecca L., 2003. "Analysis Of Breakeven Yield Gains And Input Cost Savings For A Cotton Yield Monitoring System," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35081, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    20. Yu Hao & Yingting Wang & Qiuwei Wu & Shiwei Sun & Weilu Wang & Menglin Cui, 2020. "What affects residents' participation in the circular economy for sustainable development? Evidence from China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1251-1268, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2855-:d:511809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.