IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v14y2025i6p92-d1667265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydrothermal Valorization of Peapods and Coffee Cherry Waste: Comparative Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Acid Catalysis and Evaluation of Biomass’ Influence on Catalytic Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandra Sophia Lozano Pérez

    (Departamento de Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 No. 45-02 Ed, Química, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

  • Valentina Romero Mahecha

    (Departamento de Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 No. 45-02 Ed, Química, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

  • Carlos Alberto Guerrero Fajardo

    (Departamento de Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 No. 45-02 Ed, Química, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

Abstract

Hydrothermal processing has emerged as a promising clean technology for managing the substantial amounts of agro-industrial waste generated worldwide. This study aims to introduce a clean technology approach to biomass valorization processes by exploring the hydrothermal conversion of two distinct biomass feedstocks, peapods and coffee cherries, into valuable platform chemicals through the use of homogeneous acid catalysts. The hydrothermal valorization experiments were conducted in a 500 mL reactor at 180 °C for 1 h with a 1:20 biomass–acid solution ratio, utilizing a set of organic and inorganic acids as catalysts. The chemical compositions of the biomass feedstocks were analyzed, revealing significant differences in their cellulose (20.2 wt% in peapods; 27.6 wt% in coffee cherries), hemicellulose (17.4 wt% in peapods; 12.5 wt% in coffee cherries), and lignin (5.0 wt% in peapods; 13.7 wt% in coffee cherries) contents. Without the use of catalysts, peapods yielded 45.128 wt% platform chemicals, outperforming coffee cherries, which produced 32.598 wt%. The introduction of various acid catalysts influenced the yields and selectivity of platform chemicals. Sulfuric acid enhanced sugar production, yielding 62.936 wt% from peapods and 51.236 wt% from coffee cherries. Hydrochloric acid selectively favored sugar production but resulted in decreased overall yields. Nitric acid facilitated the conversion of both biomass types, yielding 35.223 wt% from coffee cherries and 40.315 wt% from peapods. Adipic acid achieved the highest overall yields, with 53.668 wt% for coffee cherries and 65.165 wt% for peapods, while also increasing levulinic acid production. Acetic acid significantly increased sugar yields, which reached 50.427 wt% with peapods. The findings highlight the potential of hydrothermal valorization as a clean technology for biomass conversion and underscores the importance of tailoring catalyst selection and process conditions to optimize the valorization of biomass feedstocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandra Sophia Lozano Pérez & Valentina Romero Mahecha & Carlos Alberto Guerrero Fajardo, 2025. "Hydrothermal Valorization of Peapods and Coffee Cherry Waste: Comparative Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Acid Catalysis and Evaluation of Biomass’ Influence on Catalytic Efficiency," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:92-:d:1667265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/6/92/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/6/92/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Álvaro Astudillo & Olga Rubilar & Gabriela Briceño & María Cristina Diez & Heidi Schalchli, 2023. "Advances in Agroindustrial Waste as a Substrate for Obtaining Eco-Friendly Microbial Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Solarte-Toro, Juan Camilo & Chacón-Pérez, Yessica & Piedrahita-Rodríguez, Sara & Poveda Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro & Teixeira, José António & Moustakas, Konstantinos & Alzate, Carlos Ariel Cardona, 2020. "Effect of dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment on the physicochemical properties and enzymatic hydrolysis of coffee cut-stems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Florin-Constantin Mihai & Sedat Gündoğdu & Laura A. Markley & Arianna Olivelli & Farhan R. Khan & Claire Gwinnett & Jutta Gutberlet & Natalia Reyna-Bensusan & Paula Llanquileo-Melgarejo & Christia Mei, 2021. "Plastic Pollution, Waste Management Issues, and Circular Economy Opportunities in Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-48, December.
    4. Urszula Dziekońska-Kubczak & Joanna Berłowska & Piotr Dziugan & Piotr Patelski & Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska & Maria Balcerek, 2018. "Nitric Acid Pretreatment of Jerusalem Artichoke Stalks for Enzymatic Saccharification and Bioethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Rakshit Jakhar & Lucyna Samek & Katarzyna Styszko, 2023. "A Comprehensive Study of the Impact of Waste Fires on the Environment and Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asif Iqbal & Abdullah Yasar & Abdul-Sattar Nizami & Rafia Haider & Faiza Sharif & Imran Ali Sultan & Amtul Bari Tabinda & Aman Anwer Kedwaii & Muhammad Murtaza Chaudhary, 2022. "Municipal Solid Waste Collection and Haulage Modeling Design for Lahore, Pakistan: Transition toward Sustainability and Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-39, December.
    2. Solarte-Toro, Juan Camilo & Romero-García, Juan Miguel & Martínez-Patiño, Juan Carlos & Ruiz-Ramos, Encarnación & Castro-Galiano, Eulogio & Cardona-Alzate, Carlos Ariel, 2019. "Acid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for energy vectors production: A review focused on operational conditions and techno-economic assessment for bioethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 587-601.
    3. Shangyuan Tang & Yushen Cao & Chunming Xu & Yue Wu & Lingci Li & Peng Ye & Ying Luo & Yifan Gao & Yonghong Liao & Qiong Yan & Xiyu Cheng, 2020. "One-Step or Two-Step Acid/Alkaline Pretreatments to Improve Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Sugar Recovery from Arundo Donax L," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Ghulamullah Maitlo & Imran Ali & Hubdar Ali Maitlo & Safdar Ali & Imran Nazir Unar & Muhammad Bilal Ahmad & Darya Khan Bhutto & Ramesh Kumar Karmani & Shamim ur Rehman Naich & Raja Umer Sajjad & Sikan, 2022. "Plastic Waste Recycling, Applications, and Future Prospects for a Sustainable Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.
    5. Swati Dahiya & Raja Chowdhury & Pradeep Kumar & Sanjoy Ghosh & Asha Srinivasan, 2022. "Recovery of Sugar and Nutrients from Algae and Colocasia esculenta (Taro) Leaves Using Chemical Hydrolysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Sun, Chihe & Chen, Huan & Madadi, Meysam & Song, Guojie & Meng, Xianzhi & Zhuang, Xinshu & Song, Xueping & Tan, Xuesong & Sun, Fubao & Ragauskas, Arthur J., 2024. "Understanding the role of porous particle characteristics and water state distribution at multi-scale variation on cellulase hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    7. Ekta Sharma & Aishwarya Ramachandran & Pariva Dobriyal & Srishti Badola & Heather Koldewey & Syed Ainul Hussain & Ruchi Badola, 2025. "Mapping the Distribution and Discharge of Plastic Pollution in the Ganga River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Rahaf Ajaj & Wisam Abu Jadayil & Hamna Anver & Eman Aqil, 2022. "A Revision for the Different Reuses of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Water Bottles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Katarzyna Grzesik & Magdalena Zabochnicka & Robert Oleniacz & Ryszard Kozakiewicz, 2025. "Quantifying Resource and Energy Losses from Waste Fires in Poland: A Barrier to Circular Economy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Cristina Iacoboaea & Andrei Damian & Ioana Nenciu & Mihaela Aldea & Oana Luca & Mihai Șercăianu & Ancuța Neagu & Emanuel Răuță, 2025. "Towards Inclusive Waste Management in Marginalized Urban Areas: An Expert-Guided Framework and Its Pilot in Reșița, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Urszula Dziekońska-Kubczak & Joanna Berłowska & Piotr Dziugan & Piotr Patelski & Maria Balcerek & Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska & Katarzyna Robak, 2019. "Two-Stage Pretreatment to Improve Saccharification of Oat Straw and Jerusalem Artichoke Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Melendez, Jesus R. & Mátyás, Bence & Hena, Sufia & Lowy, Daniel A. & El Salous, Ahmed, 2022. "Perspectives in the production of bioethanol: A review of sustainable methods, technologies, and bioprocesses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Wei-Hsin Chen & Keat Teong Lee & Hwai Chyuan Ong, 2019. "Biofuel and Bioenergy Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Nor Isnaeni Dwi Arista & Dwini Handayani & Ninin Ernawati, 2023. "Is It Possible to Implement the Same Circular-Economy Concept in Rural and Urban Areas? Study on Willingness to Pay for Household Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Beauty Dzawanda & Tariro Letty Maderera & Mark Makomborero Matsa, 2025. "Prospects for Circular Economy Adoption in an Urban Open Market: Case Study of Mtapa Open Market, Gweru," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 675-698, February.
    16. Peyman Abdeshahian & Jesús Jiménez Ascencio & Rafael R. Philippini & Felipe Antonio Fernandes Antunes & Avinash P. Ingle & Mojgan Abdeshahian & Júlio César dos Santos & Silvio Silvério da Silva, 2021. "Fermentative Production of Lasiodiplodan by Lasiodiplodia theobromae CCT3966 from Pretreated Sugarcane Straw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:92-:d:1667265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.