IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i8p2153-d164322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nitric Acid Pretreatment of Jerusalem Artichoke Stalks for Enzymatic Saccharification and Bioethanol Production

Author

Listed:
  • Urszula Dziekońska-Kubczak

    (Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, Wolczanska 171/173, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

  • Joanna Berłowska

    (Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, Wolczanska 171/173, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

  • Piotr Dziugan

    (Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, Wolczanska 171/173, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

  • Piotr Patelski

    (Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, Wolczanska 171/173, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska

    (Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, Wolczanska 171/173, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

  • Maria Balcerek

    (Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, Wolczanska 171/173, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

This paper evaluated the effectiveness of nitric acid pretreatment on the hydrolysis and subsequent fermentation of Jerusalem artichoke stalks (JAS). Jerusalem artichoke is considered a potential candidate for producing bioethanol due to its low soil and climate requirements, and high biomass yield. However, its stalks have a complexed lignocellulosic structure, so appropriate pretreatment is necessary prior to enzymatic hydrolysis, to enhance the amount of sugar that can be obtained. Nitric acid is a promising catalyst for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass due to the high efficiency with which it removes hemicelluloses. Nitric acid was found to be the most effective catalyst of JAS biomass. A higher concentration of glucose and ethanol was achieved after hydrolysis and fermentation of 5% ( w / v ) HNO 3 -pretreated JAS, leading to 38.5 g/L of glucose after saccharification, which corresponds to 89% of theoretical enzymatic hydrolysis yield, and 9.5 g/L of ethanol. However, after fermentation there was still a significant amount of glucose in the medium. In comparison to more commonly used acids (H 2 SO 4 and HCl) and alkalis (NaOH and KOH), glucose yield (% of theoretical yield) was approximately 47–74% higher with HNO 3 . The fermentation of 5% nitric-acid pretreated hydrolysates with the absence of solid residues, led to an increase in ethanol yield by almost 30%, reaching 77–82% of theoretical yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Urszula Dziekońska-Kubczak & Joanna Berłowska & Piotr Dziugan & Piotr Patelski & Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska & Maria Balcerek, 2018. "Nitric Acid Pretreatment of Jerusalem Artichoke Stalks for Enzymatic Saccharification and Bioethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2153-:d:164322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imman, Saksit & Arnthong, Jantima & Burapatana, Vorakan & Champreda, Verawat & Laosiripojana, Navadol, 2015. "Fractionation of rice straw by a single-step solvothermal process: Effects of solvents, acid promoters, and microwave treatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 663-673.
    2. Rastogi, Meenal & Shrivastava, Smriti, 2017. "Recent advances in second generation bioethanol production: An insight to pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 330-340.
    3. Long, Xiao-Hua & Shao, Hong-Bo & Liu, Ling & Liu, Li-Ping & Liu, Zhao-Pu, 2016. "Jerusalem artichoke: A sustainable biomass feedstock for biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1382-1388.
    4. Ma, Shenghua & Wang, Hui & Wang, Yu & Bu, Huaiyu & Bai, Jinbo, 2011. "Bio-hydrogen production from cornstalk wastes by orthogonal design method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 709-713.
    5. Eyidogan, Muharrem & Canka Kilic, Fatma & Kaya, Durmus & Coban, Volkan & Cagman, Selman, 2016. "Investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technologies in Turkey from the technical and economic point of view," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 885-895.
    6. Kim, Seonghun & Kim, Chul Ho, 2014. "Evaluation of whole Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for consolidated bioprocessing ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 83-91.
    7. Wilson, P. & Glithero, N.J. & Ramsden, S.J., 2014. "Prospects for dedicated energy crop production and attitudes towards agricultural straw use: The case of livestock farmers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 101-110.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Swati Dahiya & Raja Chowdhury & Pradeep Kumar & Sanjoy Ghosh & Asha Srinivasan, 2022. "Recovery of Sugar and Nutrients from Algae and Colocasia esculenta (Taro) Leaves Using Chemical Hydrolysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Urszula Dziekońska-Kubczak & Joanna Berłowska & Piotr Dziugan & Piotr Patelski & Maria Balcerek & Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska & Katarzyna Robak, 2019. "Two-Stage Pretreatment to Improve Saccharification of Oat Straw and Jerusalem Artichoke Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Melendez, Jesus R. & Mátyás, Bence & Hena, Sufia & Lowy, Daniel A. & El Salous, Ahmed, 2022. "Perspectives in the production of bioethanol: A review of sustainable methods, technologies, and bioprocesses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Peyman Abdeshahian & Jesús Jiménez Ascencio & Rafael R. Philippini & Felipe Antonio Fernandes Antunes & Avinash P. Ingle & Mojgan Abdeshahian & Júlio César dos Santos & Silvio Silvério da Silva, 2021. "Fermentative Production of Lasiodiplodan by Lasiodiplodia theobromae CCT3966 from Pretreated Sugarcane Straw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Wei-Hsin Chen & Keat Teong Lee & Hwai Chyuan Ong, 2019. "Biofuel and Bioenergy Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Shangyuan Tang & Yushen Cao & Chunming Xu & Yue Wu & Lingci Li & Peng Ye & Ying Luo & Yifan Gao & Yonghong Liao & Qiong Yan & Xiyu Cheng, 2020. "One-Step or Two-Step Acid/Alkaline Pretreatments to Improve Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Sugar Recovery from Arundo Donax L," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    7. Solarte-Toro, Juan Camilo & Romero-García, Juan Miguel & Martínez-Patiño, Juan Carlos & Ruiz-Ramos, Encarnación & Castro-Galiano, Eulogio & Cardona-Alzate, Carlos Ariel, 2019. "Acid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for energy vectors production: A review focused on operational conditions and techno-economic assessment for bioethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 587-601.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariana Abreu & Luís Silva & Belina Ribeiro & Alice Ferreira & Luís Alves & Susana M. Paixão & Luísa Gouveia & Patrícia Moura & Florbela Carvalheiro & Luís C. Duarte & Ana Luisa Fernando & Alberto Rei, 2022. "Low Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) Energy Crops to Bioenergy and Biofuels—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-68, June.
    2. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    3. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    4. Azman, Nadia Farhana & Abdeshahian, Peyman & Kadier, Abudukeremu & Shukor, Hafiza & Al-Shorgani, Najeeb Kaid Nasser & Hamid, Aidil Abdul & Kalil, Mohd Sahaid, 2016. "Utilization of palm kernel cake as a renewable feedstock for fermentative hydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 700-708.
    5. Eksi, Guner & Karaosmanoglu, Filiz, 2017. "Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1313-1332.
    6. Kumar, G. & Bakonyi, P. & Periyasamy, S. & Kim, S.H. & Nemestóthy, N. & Bélafi-Bakó, K., 2015. "Lignocellulose biohydrogen: Practical challenges and recent progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 728-737.
    7. Melikoglu, Mehmet, 2017. "Geothermal energy in Turkey and around the World: A review of the literature and an analysis based on Turkey's Vision 2023 energy targets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 485-492.
    8. Ndayisenga, Fabrice & Yu, Zhisheng & Zheng, Jianzhong & Wang, Bobo & Liang, Hongxia & Phulpoto, Irfan Ali & Habiyakare, Telesphore & Zhou, Dandan, 2021. "Microbial electrohydrogenesis cell and dark fermentation integrated system enhances biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic agricultural wastes: Substrate pretreatment towards optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Townsend, T.J. & Sparkes, D.L. & Ramsden, S.J. & Glithero, N.J. & Wilson, P., 2018. "Wheat straw availability for bioenergy in England," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 349-357.
    10. Merve Nazli Borand & Asli Isler Kaya & Filiz Karaosmanoglu, 2020. "Saccharification Yield through Enzymatic Hydrolysis of the Steam-Exploded Pinewood," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, September.
    11. Mishra, Archana & Ghosh, Sanjoy, 2020. "Saccharification of kans grass biomass by a novel fractional hydrolysis method followed by co-culture fermentation for bioethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 750-759.
    12. Holmatov, B. & Schyns, J.F. & Krol, M.S. & Gerbens-Leenes, P.W. & Hoekstra, A.Y., 2021. "Can crop residues provide fuel for future transport? Limited global residue bioethanol potentials and large associated land, water and carbon footprints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Gupte, Ameya Pankaj & Basaglia, Marina & Casella, Sergio & Favaro, Lorenzo, 2022. "Rice waste streams as a promising source of biofuels: feedstocks, biotechnologies and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Guan, Xu & Zhou, Zheng & Luo, Ping & Wu, Fengshun & Dong, Shijie, 2019. "Hydrogen generation from the reaction of Al-based composites activated by low-melting-point metals/oxides/salts with water," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Xia, Liangyu & Zhang, Yabo, 2019. "An overview of world geothermal power generation and a case study on China—The resource and market perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 411-423.
    16. Schillo, R. Sandra & Isabelle, Diane A. & Shakiba, Abtin, 2017. "Linking advanced biofuels policies with stakeholder interests: A method building on Quality Function Deployment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 126-137.
    17. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    18. Zabed, H. & Sahu, J.N. & Suely, A. & Boyce, A.N. & Faruq, G., 2017. "Bioethanol production from renewable sources: Current perspectives and technological progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 475-501.
    19. Adams, P.W.R. & Lindegaard, K., 2016. "A critical appraisal of the effectiveness of UK perennial energy crops policy since 1990," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 188-202.
    20. Savvas L. Douvartzides & Aristidis Tsiolikas & Nikolaos D. Charisiou & Manolis Souliotis & Vayos Karayannis & Nikolaos Taousanidis, 2022. "Energy and Exergy-Based Screening of Various Refrigerants, Hydrocarbons and Siloxanes for the Optimization of Biomass Boiler–Organic Rankine Cycle (BB–ORC) Heat and Power Cogeneration Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2153-:d:164322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.