IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2252-d1046747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Purchase Intention of E-Commerce Poverty Alleviation Products Based on Perceived Justice Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Wang

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Guangming Li

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Rongmei Jiang

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

This study is to empirically test whether and how perceived justice affects consumers’ purchase intention regarding e-commerce poverty alleviation products (ECPAP). Based on social exchange theory, self-regulation attitude theory, and the analysis of other relevant literature, this study proposes a model of perceived justice affecting purchase intention regarding ECPAP, in which emotional attitude is the mediator and consumers’ perceived self-serving motivation (CPSSM) is the moderating variable. Three-hundred and eighteen valid observations were collected using the questionnaire method, and these data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 and AMOS 22.0. The results showed that all three dimensions of perceived justice significantly and positively affect the purchase intention of ECPAP, and this effect is negatively moderated by CPSSM. In addition, an emotional attitude partially mediates the linkage between perceived justice and the intention to purchase ECPAP. The findings not only enrich the research on perceived justice and e-commerce poverty alleviation, but also provide management implications for promoting the benign sales of ECPAP from the perspective of merchants and related subjects. To a certain extent, the above findings can also be extended to other countries’ poverty reduction and rural construction work.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Wang & Guangming Li & Rongmei Jiang, 2023. "Research on Purchase Intention of E-Commerce Poverty Alleviation Products Based on Perceived Justice Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2252-:d:1046747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2252/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2252/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvia Platania & Kyle Maurice Woosnam & Manuel Alector Ribeiro, 2021. "Factors Predicting Individuals’ Behavioural Intentions for Choosing Cultural Tourism: A Structural Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Guoyin Xu & Tong Zhao & Rong Wang, 2022. "Research on the Efficiency Measurement and Spatial Spillover Effect of China’s Regional E-Commerce Poverty Alleviation from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Zhiyuan Yu & Kun Zhang, 2022. "The Determinants of Purchase Intention on Agricultural Products via Public-Interest Live Streaming for Farmers during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2021. "CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Zhijie Song & Chang Liu & Rui Shi, 2022. "How Do Fresh Live Broadcast Impact Consumers’ Purchase Intention? Based on the SOR Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Zasuwa, Grzegorz, 2016. "Do the ends justify the means? How altruistic values moderate consumer responses to corporate social initiatives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3714-3719.
    8. Becker-Olsen, Karen L. & Cudmore, B. Andrew & Hill, Ronald Paul, 2006. "The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 46-53, January.
    9. Mathur, Pragya & Sarin Jain, Shalini, 2020. "Not all that glitters is golden: The impact of procedural fairness perceptions on firm evaluations and customer satisfaction with favorable outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 357-367.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucia Reisch & Clive L Spash & Sabine Bietz, 2008. "Sustainable Consumption and Mass Communication: A German Experiment," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2008-12, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    2. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Kalina Grzesiuk, 2017. "Communicating a Company’s CSR Activities Through Social Networks: A Theoretical Framework," Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, vol. 20(4), pages 89-104, December.
    4. S. Hansen & Benjamin Dunford & Alan Boss & R. Boss & Ingo Angermeier, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Benefits of Employee Trust: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 29-45, August.
    5. Yucel-Aybat, Ozge & Hsieh, Meng-Hua, 2021. "Consumer mindsets matter: Benefit framing and firm–cause fit in the persuasiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 418-427.
    6. Anran Zhang & Alex Scodellaro & Bo Pang & Hui-Yi Lo & Zhengliang Xu, 2020. "Attribution and Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing: The Interplay between Cause–Brand Fit and Corporate Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Renée Hannah A. Niro, 2023. "Antecedents of Real Estate Investment Intention among Filipino Millennials and Gen Z: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-35, September.
    8. Elsy Lediana & Tomy Perdana & Yosini Deliana & Tuhpawana P. Sendjaja, 2023. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention of Youth for Agriculture Start-Up: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Hao Dong & Yang Zhang & Tianqing Chen, 2023. "A Study on Farmers’ Participation in Environmental Protection in the Context of Rural Revitalization: The Moderating Role of Policy Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Cabeza-Ramírez, L. Javier & Sánchez-Cañizares, Sandra M. & Santos-Roldán, Luna M. & Fuentes-García, Fernando J., 2022. "Impact of the perceived risk in influencers' product recommendations on their followers' purchase attitudes and intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Mobin Fatma, 2022. "Consumer Formation of CSR Image: Role of Altruistic Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-9, November.
    12. Henri Kuokkanen & William Sun, 2020. "Companies, Meet Ethical Consumers: Strategic CSR Management to Impact Consumer Choice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 403-423, October.
    13. Bowon Suh & Shinyoung Kang & Hyeyoung Moon, 2022. "Estimating the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Customers’ Dining-Out Activities in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Drăgan, George Bogdan & Ben Arfi, Wissal & Tiberius, Victor & Ammari, Aymen, 2023. "Gravitating exogenous shocks to the next normal through entrepreneurial coopetive interactions: A PLS-SEM and fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Elena Druică & Rodica Ianole-Călin & Andreea-Ionela Puiu, 2023. "When Less Is More: Understanding the Adoption of a Minimalist Lifestyle Using the Theory of Planned Behavior," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Martina Morando & Silvia Platania, 2022. "Luxury Tourism Consumption in the Accommodation Sector: The Mediation Role of Destination Brand Love for Potential Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Shahid Nawaz & Yun Jiang & Muhammad Zahid Nawaz & Syeda Farzana Manzoor & Ruixue Zhang, 2021. "Mindful Consumption, Ego-Involvement, and Social Norms Impact on Buying SHC: Role of Platform Trust and Impulsive Buying Tendency," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    18. Saha, Sajeeb & Ranjan, Kumar Rakesh & Pappu, Ravi & Akhlaghpour, Saeed, 2023. "Corporate giving and its impact on consumer evaluations: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Balween Kaur & Veer P. Gangwar & Ganesh Dash, 2022. "Green Marketing Strategies, Environmental Attitude, and Green Buying Intention: A Multi-Group Analysis in an Emerging Economy Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Duygu Turker & Ozge Can & Gizem Aras‐Beger, 2023. "How authenticity of corporate social responsibility affects organizational attractiveness: Stakeholder perceptions of organizational ideology," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1680-1697, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2252-:d:1046747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.