IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2008-d1042539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rabbit Meat—Production, Consumption and Consumers’ Attitudes and Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Shahida Anusha Siddiqui

    (Department of Biotechnology and Sustainability, Technical University of Munich, Essigberg 3, 94315 Straubing, Germany
    German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

  • Francesca Gerini

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, P.le delle Cascine 18, 50144 Firenze, Italy)

  • Ali Ikram

    (University Institute of Food Science and Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Farhan Saeed

    (Department of Food Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Xi Feng

    (Department of Nutrition, Food Science and Packaging, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192, USA)

  • Yanping Chen

    (Department of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture & Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

Rabbit meat could play an important role in health, the rural economy, and sustainable development. Rabbit meat has excellent nutritional features, such as high protein content, low-fat content, and a high percentage of unsaturated fatty acids, low cholesterol and sodium levels. In addition, rabbit meat production contributes to maintaining economic activities in rural marginal areas. However, the consumption of rabbit meat is still limited due to several factors such as the higher cost of commercial food that is slowing down rabbits’ breeding. Socio-demographic characteristics, attitudes, and nationality of consumers influence the demand and consumption of rabbit meat. The social and economic changes of the past years are leading to an increased interest in rabbit meat products with convenience characteristics. Consumers are also increasingly paying attention to animal husbandry methods for health concerns and ethical reasons. This paper presents an overview of rabbit meat focusing on production, nutritional composition, consumers’ preferences, and marketing. The review proposes strategies that, coupled with information campaigns could improve consumers’ knowledge of the positive characteristics of rabbit meat, which would contribute to the market development.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahida Anusha Siddiqui & Francesca Gerini & Ali Ikram & Farhan Saeed & Xi Feng & Yanping Chen, 2023. "Rabbit Meat—Production, Consumption and Consumers’ Attitudes and Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2008-:d:1042539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2008/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2008/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruben Sanchez-Sabate & Joan Sabaté, 2019. "Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-37, April.
    2. Muriithi, Beatrice W. & Matz, Julia Anna, 2015. "Welfare effects of vegetable commercialization: Evidence from smallholder producers in Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 80-91.
    3. Jean Adanguidi, 2020. "Analysis of Consumer Demand and Preference for Rabbit Meat in Benin," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joshi, Niraj Prakash & Piya, Luni, 2021. "Impact of Availing Important Inputs, Technical Assistance and Loans on the Extent of Vegetable Commercialization in Nepal," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315257, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Irina Chernukha & Elena Kotenkova & Svetlana Derbeneva & Daniil Khvostov, 2021. "Bioactive Compounds of Porcine Hearts and Aortas May Improve Cardiovascular Disorders in Humans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Giger, Markus & Mutea, Emily & Kiteme, Boniface & Eckert, Sandra & Anseeuw, Ward & Zaehringer, Julie G., 2020. "Large agricultural investments in Kenya’s Nanyuki Area: Inventory and analysis of business models," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Hernando Barreto Riaño & John Willmer Escobar & Rodrigo Linfati & Virna Ortiz-Araya, 2022. "Disciplinary Categorization of the Cattle Supply Chain—A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-44, November.
    5. Matthys, Marie-Luise & Acharya, Sushant & Khatri, Sanjaya, 2021. "“Before cardamom, we used to face hardship”: Analyzing agricultural commercialization effects in Nepal through a local concept of the Good Life," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Youngdeok Lee & Kittichai Watchravesringkan, 2022. "How to Promote Eco-Apparel? Effects of Eco-Labels and Message Framing," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(2), pages 1-69, December.
    7. Justus Ochieng & Beatrice Knerr & George Owuor & Emily Ouma, 2016. "Commercialisation of Food Crops and Farm Productivity: Evidence from Smallholders in Central Africa," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 458-482, October.
    8. Orkhan Sariyev & Tim K. Loos & Ling Yee Khor, 2021. "Intra-household decision-making, production diversity, and dietary quality: a panel data analysis of Ethiopian rural households," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(1), pages 181-197, February.
    9. Muricho, Geoffrey & Manda, Damiano & Sule, Fredrick & Kassie, Menale, 2017. "Smallholder Agricultural Commercialization and Poverty: Empirical Evidence of Panel Data from Kenya," 91st Annual Conference, April 24-26, 2017, Royal Dublin Society, Dublin, Ireland 258618, Agricultural Economics Society.
    10. Andy McKay & Chiara Cazzuffi & Emilie Perge, 2018. "The impact of commercialization of rice on household welfare in rural Vietnam," WIDER Working Paper Series 130, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Ewa Halicka & Joanna Kaczorowska & Krystyna Rejman & Agata Szczebyło, 2021. "Parental Food Choices and Engagement in Raising Children’s Awareness of Sustainable Behaviors in Urban Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Yingjie Lai & Chaemoon Yoo & Xiaomin Zhou & Younghwan Pan, 2023. "Elements of Food Service Design for Low-Carbon Tourism-Based on Dine-In Tourist Behavior and Attitudes in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Akrong, Rexford & Kotu, Bekele Hundie, 2021. "Economic Analysis of Youth Participation in Agripreneurship in Benin," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315090, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Jörg Rieger & Florian Freund & Frank Offermann & Inna Geibel & Alexander Gocht, 2023. "From fork to farm: Impacts of more sustainable diets in the EU‐27 on the agricultural sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 764-784, September.
    15. Ogutu, Sylvester Ochieng & Qaim, Matin, 2019. "Commercialization of the small farm sector and multidimensional poverty," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 281-293.
    16. Bianca Blum & Bernhard K. J. Neumärker, 2021. "Lessons from Globalization and the COVID-19 Pandemic for Economic, Environmental and Social Policy," World, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-26, June.
    17. Justus, Ochieng & Knerr, Beatrice & Owuor, George & Ouma, Emily, 2015. "Agricultural commercialization and household food security: The case of smallholders in Great Lakes Region of Central Africa," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212588, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Ochieng, Dennis O. & Veettil, Prakashan C. & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Farmers’ preferences for supermarket contracts in Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 100-111.
    19. Montalbano, P. & Pietrelli, R. & Salvatici, L., 2018. "Participation in the market chain and food security: The case of the Ugandan maize farmers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 81-98.
    20. German, Laura A. & Bonanno, Anya M. & Foster, Laura Catherine & Cotula, Lorenzo, 2020. "“Inclusive business” in agriculture: Evidence from the evolution of agricultural value chains," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2008-:d:1042539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.