IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1923-d1041271.html

CRITIC-TOPSIS Based Evaluation of Smart Community Governance: A Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiyao Yin

    (Technology and Information Center, Shenzhen Urban Public Safety and Technology Institute, Shenzhen 518000, China)

  • Jueqi Wang

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Chenyang Wang

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Linxiu Wang

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Zhangyu Chang

    (Technology and Information Center, Shenzhen Urban Public Safety and Technology Institute, Shenzhen 518000, China)

Abstract

As the basic unit of a smart city, the smart community has received considerable attention and problems in community governance have appeared simultaneously. Previous studies of smart community governance have failed to encompass all aspects, especially the evaluation tools for ensuring its outcomes. Therefore, this paper developed a comprehensive evaluation framework based on the CRITIC-TOPSIS method combined with the identified evaluation indicators. Seven smart communities from four cities in China were selected as cases to show how this evaluation framework could be applied to decision-making. The results indicated that the evaluation indicator ”Mediation of Conflict” had the highest weight while ”The participation of social enterprises in governance” had the lowest weight. Furthermore, the Yucun community presented the highest governance performance among these seven smart communities. Several strategies are proposed for improving the level of smart community governance, such as devoting significant resources to develop infrastructure in smart communities, facilitating communication among multiple participants, and increasing funding for the implementation of smart communities. This research contributes both to the innovation of community governance evaluation and to the improvement of smart communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiyao Yin & Jueqi Wang & Chenyang Wang & Linxiu Wang & Zhangyu Chang, 2023. "CRITIC-TOPSIS Based Evaluation of Smart Community Governance: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1923-:d:1041271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Jiandong & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin, 2017. "Decomposing inequality in energy-related CO2 emissions by source and source increment: The roles of production and residential consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 698-710.
    2. Wang, Chengjiang & Wang, Li & Wang, Juan & Sun, Shiwen & Xia, Chengyi, 2017. "Inferring the reputation enhances the cooperation in the public goods game on interdependent lattices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 18-29.
    3. Wang, Zhaohua & Wang, Xiaomeng & Guo, Dongxue, 2017. "Policy implications of the purchasing intentions towards energy-efficient appliances among China’s urban residents: Do subsidies work?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 430-439.
    4. Zhaohua Wang & Yi Li & Ke Wang & Zhimin Huang, 2017. "Environment-adjusted operational performance evaluation of solar photovoltaic power plants: A three stage efficiency analysis," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 104, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    5. Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Yi & Wang, Ke & Huang, Zhimin, 2017. "Environment-adjusted operational performance evaluation of solar photovoltaic power plants: A three stage efficiency analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1153-1162.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cankun Li & Jiang Chang & Shiyuan Zhou & Shanshan Feng, 2025. "Ecosystem Health Assessment of Coal Mining Subsidence Wetlands Using the DPSIR Model: A Case Study in Yingshang County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Tiantian Gu & Enyang Hao & Chenyang Wang & Shiyao Zhu & Yongchao Wang, 2025. "CRITIC-PROMETHEE II-Based Evaluation of Smart Community Services: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 3286-3320, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olawale Ogunrinde & Ekundayo Shittu, 2023. "Benchmarking performance of photovoltaic power plants in multiple periods," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 489-503, September.
    2. Nakamoto, Yuya & Eguchi, Shogo & Takayabu, Hirotaka, 2024. "Efficiency and benchmarks for photovoltaic power generation amid uncertain conditions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Li, Jiaxin & Wang, Zihan & Cheng, Xin & Shuai, Jing & Shuai, Chuanmin & Liu, Jing, 2020. "Has solar PV achieved the national poverty alleviation goals? Empirical evidence from the performances of 52 villages in rural China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. Ronewa Collen Nemalili & Lordwell Jhamba & Joseph Kiprono Kirui & Caston Sigauke, 2023. "Nowcasting Hourly-Averaged Tilt Angles of Acceptance for Solar Collector Applications Using Machine Learning Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Nakamoto, Yuya & Eguchi, Shogo, 2024. "How do seasonal and technical factors affect generation efficiency of photovoltaic power plants?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Kamran Ali & Laiq Khan & Qudrat Khan & Shafaat Ullah & Saghir Ahmad & Sidra Mumtaz & Fazal Wahab Karam & Naghmash, 2019. "Robust Integral Backstepping Based Nonlinear MPPT Control for a PV System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Wu, Yunna & Ke, Yiming & Zhang, Ting & Liu, Fangtong & Wang, Jing, 2018. "Performance efficiency assessment of photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects in China: A three-phase data envelopment analysis model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 599-610.
    8. Zhang, Tiantian & Nakagawa, Kei & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi, 2023. "Evaluating solar photovoltaic power efficiency based on economic dimensions for 26 countries using a three-stage data envelopment analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    9. Chen, Xin & Zhou, Wenjia, 2023. "Performance evaluation of aquavoltaics in China: Retrospect and prospect," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Haoran Zhao & Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2018. "Operational Efficiency of Chinese Provincial Electricity Grid Enterprises: An Evaluation Employing a Three-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Li, Jiaxin & Peng, Jiachao & Shuai, Chuanmin & Wang, Zihan & Huang, Fubin & Khayyam, Muhammad, 2022. "Does the solar PV program enhance the social empowerment of China's rural poor?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    12. Sun, Chuanwang & Liu, Xiaohong & Li, Aijun, 2018. "Measuring unified efficiency of Chinese fossil fuel power plants: Intermediate approach combined with group heterogeneity and window analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 8-18.
    13. Huaimo You & Hong Fang & Xu Wang & Siran Fang, 2018. "Environmental Efficiency of Photovoltaic Power Plants in China—A Comparative Study of Different Economic Zones and Plant Types," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Santos, Marllen & González, Mario, 2019. "Factors that influence the performance of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 643-651.
    15. Izhar Ul Haq & Qudrat Khan & Safeer Ullah & Shahid Ahmed Khan & Rini Akmeliawati & Mehmood Ashraf Khan & Jamshed Iqbal, 2022. "Neural network-based adaptive global sliding mode MPPT controller design for stand-alone photovoltaic systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-29, January.
    16. Li, Mengdi & Han, Chuanfeng & Meng, Lingpeng & Liu, Pihui & Shao, Zhiguo, 2025. "Spatiotemporal dynamics and driving factors of the coupling coordination between solar photovoltaic efficiency and installed capacity in China (2015–2023)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    17. Carreno-Madinabeitia, Sheila & Ibarra-Berastegi, Gabriel & Sáenz, Jon & Ulazia, Alain, 2021. "Long-term changes in offshore wind power density and wind turbine capacity factor in the Iberian Peninsula (1900–2010)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    18. Zhang, Chunxiao & Shen, Chao & Yang, Qianru & Wei, Shen & Lv, Guoquan & Sun, Cheng, 2020. "An investigation on the attenuation effect of air pollution on regional solar radiation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 570-578.
    19. Yu, Bolin & Fang, Debin & Meng, Jingxuan, 2021. "Analysis of the generation efficiency of disaggregated renewable energy and its spatial heterogeneity influencing factors: A case study of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    20. Jing Yang & Changhui Yang & Xiaojia Wang & Manli Cheng & Jingjing Shang, 2020. "Efficiency Measurement and Factor Analysis of China’s Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation Considering Regional Differences Based on a FAHP–DEA Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1923-:d:1041271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.