IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16172-d1284815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lifecycle Assessment of Two Urban Water Treatment Plants of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Shayan Jamil

    (Earthworks, Calgary, AB T3P 1B9, Canada)

  • Saimar Pervez

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila 47050, Pakistan)

  • Fiza Sarwar

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bahria University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Rameesha Abid

    (Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 44100, Pakistan)

  • Syed Umair Ullah Jamil

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bahria University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Hassan Waseem

    (Department of Biological Sciences, Muslim Youth University, Islamabad 44310, Pakistan
    Department of Chemistry and Biology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 0C3, Canada)

  • Kimberley A. Gilbride

    (Department of Chemistry and Biology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 0C3, Canada)

Abstract

Water treatment technologies are striving to retain their ecological and economic viability despite the rising demand, conventional infrastructure, financial constraints, fluctuating climatic patterns, and highly stringent regulations. This study evaluates the lifecycle environmental impact of urban water treatment systems within the two densely populated South Asian municipalities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The scope of this study includes a process-based Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the entire water treatment system, particularly the resources and materials consumed during the operation of the treatment plant. The individual and cumulative environmental impact was assessed based on the treatment system data and an in-depth lifecycle inventory analysis. Other than the direct emissions to the environment, the electricity used for service and distribution pumping, coagulant use for floc formation, chlorine gas used for disinfection, and caustic soda used for pH stabilization were the processes identified as the most significant sources of emissions to air and water. The water distribution consumed up to 98% of energy resources. The highest global warming impacts (from 0.3 to 0.6 kg CO 2 eq./m 3 ) were assessed as being from the coagulation and distribution processes due to extensive electricity consumption. Direct discharge of the wash and wastewater to the open environment contributed approximately 0.08% of kg-N and 0.002% of kg-P to the eutrophication potential. The outcome of this study resulted in a thorough lifecycle inventory development, including possible alternatives to enhance system sustainability. A definite gap was identified in intermittent sampling at the treatment systems. However, more stringent sampling including the emissions to air can provide a better sustainability score for each unit process.

Suggested Citation

  • Shayan Jamil & Saimar Pervez & Fiza Sarwar & Rameesha Abid & Syed Umair Ullah Jamil & Hassan Waseem & Kimberley A. Gilbride, 2023. "Lifecycle Assessment of Two Urban Water Treatment Plants of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16172-:d:1284815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molinos-Senante, María & Sala-Garrido, Ramón, 2017. "Energy intensity of treating drinking water: Understanding the influence of factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 275-281.
    2. Julian Agyeman & Briony Angus, 2003. "The Role of Civic Environmentalism in the Pursuit of Sustainable Communities," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 345-363.
    3. Molinos-Senante, María & Guzmán, Catalina, 2018. "Reducing CO2 emissions from drinking water treatment plants: A shadow price approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 623-631.
    4. Rayssa Horacio Lopes & Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva & Pétala Tuani Cândido de Oliveira Salvador & Ísis de Siqueira Silva & Léo Heller & Severina Alice da Costa Uchôa, 2022. "Surveillance of Drinking Water Quality Worldwide: Scoping Review Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-9, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berka, Anna L. & Creamer, Emily, 2018. "Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3400-3419.
    2. Molinos-Senante, María & Sala-Garrido, Ramón, 2018. "Evaluation of energy performance of drinking water treatment plants: Use of energy intensity and energy efficiency metrics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1095-1102.
    3. Wu, Yinyin & Yu, Jie & Song, Malin & Chen, Jiandong & Hou, Wenxuan, 2021. "Shadow prices of industrial air pollutant emissions in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 726-736.
    4. Chu, Chu & Ritter, William & Sun, Xiaohui, 2019. "Spatial variances of water-energy nexus in China and its implications for provincial resource interdependence," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 487-502.
    5. Tony G. Reames & Nathaniel S. Wright, 2021. "The Three E’s Revisited: How Do Community-Based Organizations Define Sustainable Communities and Their Role in Pursuit of?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Cui, Lixin & Dong, Ruxue & Mu, Yunguo & Shen, Zhiyang & Xu, Jiatong, 2022. "How policy preferences affect the carbon shadow price in the OECD," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    7. Julia Affolderbach & Christian Schulz, 2016. "Mobile transitions: Exploring synergies for urban sustainability research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1942-1957, July.
    8. Julian Agyeman & Tom Evans, 2003. "Toward Just Sustainability in Urban Communities: Building Equity Rights with Sustainable Solutions," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 590(1), pages 35-53, November.
    9. Manuel Mocholi-Arce & Ramon Sala-Garrido & Maria Molinos-Senante & Alexandros Maziotis, 2022. "Measuring the eco-efficiency of the provision of drinking water by two-stage network data envelopment analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12883-12899, November.
    10. María Molinos-Senante & Ramón Sala-Garrido, 2019. "Assessment of Energy Efficiency and Its Determinants for Drinking Water Treatment Plants Using A Double-Bootstrap Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    11. Alice Paola Pomè & Chiara Tagliaro & Gianandrea Ciaramella, 2021. "A Proposal for Measuring In-Use Buildings’ Impact through the Ecological Footprint Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Shah, Syed Ale Raza & Zhang, Qianxiao & Abbas, Jaffar & Tang, Hui & Al-Sulaiti, Khalid Ibrahim, 2023. "Waste management, quality of life and natural resources utilization matter for renewable electricity generation: The main and moderate role of environmental policy," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    13. Ramon Sala-Garrido & Manuel Mocholi-Arce & Maria Molinos-Senante & Michail Smyrnakis & Alexandros Maziotis, 2021. "Eco-Efficiency of the English and Welsh Water Companies: A Cross Performance Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Pauline Macharia & Maria Wirth & Paul Yillia & Norbert Kreuzinger, 2021. "Examining the Relative Impact of Drivers on Energy Input for Municipal Water Supply in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    15. Rayssa Horacio Lopes & Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva & Ísis de Siqueira Silva & Pétala Tuani Cândido de Oliveira Salvador & Léo Heller & Severina Alice da Costa Uchôa, 2022. "Worldwide Surveillance Actions and Initiatives of Drinking Water Quality: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Suzanne Vallance & Harvey C. Perkins & Jacky Bowring & Jennifer E. Dixon, 2012. "Almost Invisible: Glimpsing the City and its Residents in the Urban Sustainability Discourse," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(8), pages 1695-1710, June.
    17. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Hao, Yaqian, 2021. "Component rearrangement and system replacement for a system with stochastic degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    18. Sala-Garrido, Ramon & Mocholi-Arce, Manuel & Molinos-Senante, Maria & Maziotis, Alexandros, 2021. "Assessing the marginal cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: A parametric approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Andrea Testi & Iacopo Zetti & Elena Tarsi & Cassandra Fontana & Maria Rita Gisotti & Maddalena Rossi, 2023. "Supporting Local Implementation of the European Green Deal through a Place-Based, Participatory Approach: Methodology for a Comprehensive Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Atif Saleem & Philip Saagyum Dare, 2023. "Unmasking the Action-Oriented ESD Approach to Acting Environmentally Friendly," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16172-:d:1284815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.