IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15975-d1280886.html

Factors Influencing Carbon Emissions in High Carbon Industries in the Zhejiang Province and Decoupling Effect Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Xiao

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Cheng Yong

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Wei Hu

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Hanyun Wang

    (State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co., Ltd., Huzhou Power Supply Company, Huzhou 313099, China)

Abstract

High-carbon emission industries are the most important source of carbon emissions in the Zhejiang Province. Due to the differences in the development level of various industries, it is necessary to adjust the carbon emission reduction strategies of various industries. As the first ecological province in China, the promotion of carbon emission reduction in high-carbon industries in the Zhejiang Province plays an important leading role in the development of low-carbon economy in other industries and other provinces in China. Taking eight high-carbon industries in Zhejiang Province as the research object, this paper uses the LMDI factor decomposition model to deconstruct the influencing factors and effects of carbon emissions in eight industries in the Zhejiang Province from 2010 to 2021. On this basis, the Tapio decoupling model is applied to study the reasons and driving factors of the decoupling between economic growth and carbon emissions. The results showed that: (1) During the study period, the total carbon emissions of eight industries in the Zhejiang Province increased by 24,312,200 t, showing an overall upward trend. (2) The effect of economic growth and population size led to the rapid growth of carbon emissions in eight industries in the Zhejiang Province, and the effect of energy intensity on carbon emission reduction was the most significant; the effect of industry structure presented a trend of first promoting and then inhibiting, and the effect of carbon emission coefficient always inhibited carbon emissions. (3) The population size has restricted decoupling efforts; energy intensity has the greatest impact on the realization of industry decoupling; energy structure and industry structure decoupling efforts are small; the carbon emission coefficient has always influenced decoupling efforts. This research paper will provide suggestions and policies for the development of low-carbon economy in Zhejiang Province.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Xiao & Cheng Yong & Wei Hu & Hanyun Wang, 2023. "Factors Influencing Carbon Emissions in High Carbon Industries in the Zhejiang Province and Decoupling Effect Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15975-:d:1280886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15975/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15975/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, H. & Ang, B.W. & Su, Bin, 2017. "Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of energy and emission intensities: Some methodological issues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 47-63.
    2. Wang, Wenwen & Li, Man & Zhang, Ming, 2017. "Study on the changes of the decoupling indicator between energy-related CO2 emission and GDP in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 11-18.
    3. Fergus Green & Nicholas Stern, 2017. "China's changing economy: implications for its carbon dioxide emissions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 423-442, May.
    4. Chen, Hao & Qi, Shaozhou & Zhang, Jihong, 2022. "Towards carbon neutrality with Chinese characteristics: From an integrated perspective of economic growth-equity-environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    5. Fang Chen & Tao Zhao & Di Wang, 2022. "Research on China Cities’ Total Factor Productivity of Carbon Emission: Based on Decoupling Effect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Zhicong Zhang & Hao Xie & Jubing Zhang & Xinye Wang & Jiayu Wei & Xibin Quan, 2022. "Prediction and Trend Analysis of Regional Industrial Carbon Emission in China: A Study of Nanjing City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Runde Gu & Chunfa Li & Dongdong Li & Yangyang Yang & Shan Gu, 2022. "The Impact of Rationalization and Upgrading of Industrial Structure on Carbon Emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Ang, B.W. & Goh, Tian, 2019. "Index decomposition analysis for comparing emission scenarios: Applications and challenges," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 74-87.
    9. Peng Fang, 2023. "Short-term carbon emission prediction method of green building based on IPAT model," International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 45(1), pages 1-13.
    10. Jaehyeok Kim & Hyungwoo Lim & Ha-Hyun Jo, 2020. "Do Aging and Low Fertility Reduce Carbon Emissions in Korea? Evidence from IPAT Augmented EKC Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lizhan Cao & Hui Wang, 2022. "The Slowdown in China’s Energy Consumption Growth in the “New Normal” Stage: From Both National and Regional Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Liang, Wei & Gan, Ting & Zhang, Wei, 2019. "Dynamic evolution of characteristics and decomposition of factors influencing industrial carbon dioxide emissions in China: 1991–2015," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 93-106.
    3. Yang, Xue & Xu, He & Su, Bin, 2022. "Factor decomposition for global and national aggregate energy intensity change during 2000–2014," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    4. Xiao, Hao & Sun, Ke-Juan & Bi, Hui-Min & Meng, Bo, 2021. "Attribution of changes in an intensity index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Ali Faridzad & Mahta Ghafarian Ghadim, 2023. "CO2 intensity decomposition analysis in the Netherlands' manufacturing industry: an application of monetary and physical indicators," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8799-8817, August.
    6. Ping Zhou & Hailing Li, 2022. "Carbon Emissions from Manufacturing Sector in Jiangsu Province: Regional Differences and Decomposition of Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Zhaoxue Gai & Ying Xu & Guoming Du, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Differentiation and Driving Factors of Carbon Storage in Cultivated Land-Use Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Sapkota, Krishna & Gemechu, Eskinder & Oni, Abayomi Olufemi & Ma, Linwei & Kumar, Amit, 2022. "Greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian oil sands supply chains to China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    9. Ling Yang & Michael L. Lahr, 2019. "The Drivers of China’s Regional Carbon Emission Change—A Structural Decomposition Analysis from 1997 to 2007," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Zhou, Dongdong & Cheng, Shusen, 2019. "Measurement study of the PCI process on the temperature distribution in raceway zone of blast furnace by using digital imaging techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 814-822.
    11. Zheng, Jiali & Mi, Zhifu & Coffman, D'Maris & Milcheva, Stanimira & Shan, Yuli & Guan, Dabo & Wang, Shouyang, 2019. "Regional development and carbon emissions in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 25-36.
    12. Yunpeng Fu & Zixuan Wang, 2024. "The Impact of Industrial Agglomeration on Urban Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Study Based on the Panel Data of China’s Prefecture-Level Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Jianguo Zhou & Baoling Jin & Shijuan Du & Ping Zhang, 2018. "Scenario Analysis of Carbon Emissions of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Qin, Yao & Zhang, Hongmei & Liang, Wei, 2025. "Can dual-pilot policy of innovative city and carbon trading promote carbon productivity? Empirical evidence from dual-pilot city in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Jianguang Hou & Danlin Yu & Hao Song, 2025. "Evolution of Industrial Structure and Economic Growth in Hebei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Shichun Xu & Wenwen Zhang & Qinbin Li & Bin Zhao & Shuxiao Wang & Ruyin Long, 2017. "Decomposition Analysis of the Factors that Influence Energy Related Air Pollutant Emission Changes in China Using the SDA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Qifan Guan, 2023. "Decomposing and Decoupling the Energy-Related Carbon Emissions in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Using the Extended LMDI and Tapio Index Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Torres-Brito, David Israel & Cruz-Aké, Salvador & Venegas-Martínez, Francisco, 2023. "Impacto de los contaminantes por gases de efecto invernadero en el crecimiento económico en 86 países (1990-2019): Sobre la curva inversa de Kuznets [Impact of the Effect of Greenhouse Gas Pollutants on Economic Growth in 86 Countries (1990-2019):," MPRA Paper 119031, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Anita Engels, 2018. "Understanding how China is championing climate change mitigation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, December.
    20. Feng Dong & Xinqi Gao & Jingyun Li & Yuanqing Zhang & Yajie Liu, 2018. "Drivers of China’s Industrial Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Joint PDA and LMDI Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-28, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15975-:d:1280886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.