IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15925-d1279867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Perspective of Bank Employees on the Impact of Green Process Innovation and Perceived Environmental Responsibilities on the Sustainable Performance of the Banking Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Tsai-Ling Liu

    (Department of International Business, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 974301, Taiwan)

  • Tyrone T. Lin

    (Department of International Business, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 974301, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Yen Hsu

    (Department of International Business, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 974301, Taiwan)

Abstract

This research employs a questionnaire survey to examine the influence of the late phase of the pandemic on the sustainability performance of the banking industry in Taiwan. This research focuses on the perceptions of bank employees and explores the mediating role of fintech adoption (FTA) and green finance (GF). A total of 325 valid responses were collected, and structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) AMOS.21 software was applied to analyze the overall model, while the SPSS.21 PROCESS (2017) was applied to analyze the mediating effects. The empirical findings reveal that green process innovation (GI) significantly affects both green finance and banking sector sustainability performance (BSP), perceived environmental responsibility (PER) positively influence GF and FTA, and both FTA and GF positively impact BSP; however, GI had no direct impact on FTA, and FTA had no direct impact on GF. In terms of the mediating effects, PER has a complete mediating effect on BSP through FTA or GF, while GF partially mediates the relationship between GI, PER, and BSP.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsai-Ling Liu & Tyrone T. Lin & Shu-Yen Hsu, 2023. "Exploring the Perspective of Bank Employees on the Impact of Green Process Innovation and Perceived Environmental Responsibilities on the Sustainable Performance of the Banking Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15925-:d:1279867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15925/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15925/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Silva, Muthu & Wang, Pengji & Kuah, Adrian T.H., 2021. "Why wouldn’t green appeal drive purchase intention? Moderation effects of consumption values in the UK and China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 713-724.
    2. Bufan Zhang & Yifeng Wang, 2021. "The Effect of Green Finance on Energy Sustainable Development: A Case Study in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(12), pages 3435-3454, September.
    3. Chieh-Yu Lin & Yi-Hui Ho, 2011. "Determinants of Green Practice Adoption for Logistics Companies in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 67-83, January.
    4. Kammerer, Daniel, 2009. "The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation.: Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2285-2295, June.
    5. Umar, Muhammad & Safi, Adnan, 2023. "Do green finance and innovation matter for environmental protection? A case of OECD economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2021. "CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Yu-Shan Chen & Shyh-Bao Lai & Chao-Tung Wen, 2006. "The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 331-339, September.
    8. Huth, William L. & McEvoy, David M. & Morgan, O. Ashton, 2018. "Controlling an Invasive Species through Consumption: The Case of Lionfish as an Impure Public Good," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 74-79.
    9. Zaremohzzabieh, Zeinab & Ismail, Normala & Ahrari, Seyedali & Abu Samah, Asnarulkhadi, 2021. "The effects of consumer attitude on green purchase intention: A meta-analytic path analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 732-743.
    10. Tsai-Ling Liu & Tyrone T. Lin & Shu-Yen Hsu, 2022. "Continuance Usage Intention toward E-Payment during the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Financial Sustainable Development Perspective Using Perceived Usefulness and Electronic Word of Mouth as Mediators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    2. Feng Zhang & Lei Zhu, 2019. "Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1012-1026, September.
    3. Hua-Hung (Robin) Weng & Ja-Shen Chen & Pei-Ching Chen, 2015. "Effects of Green Innovation on Environmental and Corporate Performance: A Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, April.
    4. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    5. Ru-Jen Lin & Rong-Huei Chen & Thao-Minh Ho, 2013. "Market Demand, Green Innovation, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Hybrid Vehicle Industry," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    6. Cui, Xin & Wang, Chunfeng & Sensoy, Ahmet & Liao, Jing & Xie, Xiaochen, 2023. "Economic policy uncertainty and green innovation: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Jang-Hwan Jo & Tae Woo Roh & Seonghoon Kim & Yeo-Chang Youn & Mi Sun Park & Ki Joo Han & Eun Kyung Jang, 2015. "Eco-Innovation for Sustainability: Evidence from 49 Countries in Asia and Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Bang-Ning Hwang & Chi-Yo Huang & Chih-Hsiung Wu, 2016. "A TOE Approach to Establish a Green Supply Chain Adoption Decision Model in the Semiconductor Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    10. Ahmed Hassan Abdou & Thowayeb H. Hassan & Amany E. Salem & Mohamed Ahmed Elsaied & Ahmed Anwar Elsaed, 2022. "Determinants and Consequences of Green Investment in the Saudi Arabian Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Qi Guoyou & Zeng Saixing & Tam Chiming & Yin Haitao & Zou Hailiang, 2013. "Stakeholders' Influences on Corporate Green Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Manufacturing Firms in China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Alexandra Rese & Anke Kutschke & Daniel Baier, 2016. "Analyzing The Relative Influence Of Supply Side, Demand Side And Regulatory Factors On The Success Of Collaborative Energy Innovation Projects," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-43, February.
    13. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Giudice, Manlio Del & Chierici, Roberto & Graziano, Domenico, 2020. "Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    14. Ayça Kubra Hizarci‐Payne & İlayda İpek & Gülüzar Kurt Gümüş, 2021. "How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1174-1190, February.
    15. Rong-Huei Chen & Ru-Jen Lin & Yen-Ju Lin, 2013. "The Relationships Among Green Operations, Green Innovation, and Environmental Performance," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    16. Mohammad Wasiq & Mustafa Kamal & Nazim Ali, 2023. "Factors Influencing Green Innovation Adoption and Its Impact on the Sustainability Performance of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Francesco Calza & Adele Parmentola & Ilaria Tutore, 2017. "Types of Green Innovations: Ways of Implementation in a Non-Green Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Dayuan Li & Min Huang & Shenggang Ren & Xiaohong Chen & Lutao Ning, 2018. "Environmental Legitimacy, Green Innovation, and Corporate Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1089-1104, July.
    19. Pejman Ebrahimi & Seyed Mozaffar Mirbargkar, 2017. "Green entrepreneurship and green innovation for SME development in market turbulence," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(2), pages 203-228, August.
    20. Lin, Woon Leong & Ho, Jo Ann & Sambasivan, Murali & Yip, Nick & Mohamed, Azali Bin, 2021. "Influence of green innovation strategy on brand value: The role of marketing capability and R&D intensity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15925-:d:1279867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.