IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15349-d1268441.html

Examining the Effects of “Small Private Online Course and Flipped-Classroom”-Based Blended Teaching Strategy on First-Year English-Major Students’ Achievements

Author

Listed:
  • Luyan Zheng

    (School of Foreign Languages, Heze University, Heze 274000, China)

  • Keok Cheong Lee

    (Faculty of Education, City University Malaysia, Petaling Jaya 46100, Malaysia)

Abstract

Blended teaching, characterized as a combination of online instruction and face-to-face teaching is effective in maintaining high student retention, promoting learners’ motivation and saving costs in EFL teaching. However, as low learning efficiency can lead to a reduced performance related to students’ blended learning, it is necessary to study the effectiveness of blended teaching. This study aims to examine the effects of the “SPOC and Flipped classroom”-based blended teaching strategy on first-year English-major students’ achievements in five English language skills compared with those of the traditional face-to-face classroom teaching strategy. For this research, a quasi-experiment was conducted for one semester, employing an “SPOC and Flipped classroom”-based blended teaching strategy in two undergraduate classes for first-year English-major students. A total of 64 students majoring in English at a Chinese university in Shandong province participated in the quasi-experiment and were divided into the control class (N = 32, (intact group), with 6 men and 26 women) and the experimental class (N = 32, (intact group), with 4 men and 28 women). Intervention was performed in the experimental class, while a typical face-to-face classroom teaching strategy was employed in the control class. Findings of students’ overall achievements showed that the blended teaching strategy based on the SPOC and flipped-classroom approach was more effective in improving students’ achievements than face-to-face classroom teaching. Findings of students’ achievements in each of the five English language skills showed that the “SPOC and Flipped”-based blended teaching strategy was effective in enhancing students’ listening, reading, translating, and writing, but was not effective in speaking. Furthermore, students’ genders and regional backgrounds were considered as moderating variables of students’ achievements, and findings indicated that gender had no significantly positive effect on students’ achievements in the blended teaching intervention. However, a significant difference in achievements between the students from urban and rural areas was observed, which indicated that regional background had significantly positive effect on students’ achievements in blended teaching. The findings of the research implied that the implementation of well-designed blended learning that uses effective strategies could significantly improve students’ achievements in English language skills, but that there would be different results among students of different skill levels and regional backgrounds. Moreover, as the quality of EFL blended teaching improves, students’ academic performance will be enhanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Luyan Zheng & Keok Cheong Lee, 2023. "Examining the Effects of “Small Private Online Course and Flipped-Classroom”-Based Blended Teaching Strategy on First-Year English-Major Students’ Achievements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15349-:d:1268441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15349/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15349/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maureen J. Lage & Glenn J. Platt & Michael Treglia, 2000. "Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 30-43, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Peng, 2024. "Make Lectures Match How We Learn: The Nonlinear Teaching Approach to Economics," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2024/12, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Ferreira dos Santos & Lilia Ribeiro Guerra & Bruno Leal Alves & Selma Ribeiro de Paiva & Ana Lafetá Cabral & Helena C. Castro* & Ana Joffily*, 2018. "Teaching Biotechnology: A Demand Still to be Fully Attended," Journal of Biotechnology Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(4), pages 13-18, 04-2018.
    2. Lisbeth Amhag, 2017. "Mobile-Assisted Seamless Learning Activities in Higher Distance Education," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(3), pages 1-70, August.
    3. Rita A. Balaban & Donna B. Gilleskie & Uyen Tran, 2016. "A quantitative evaluation of the flipped classroom in a large lecture principles of economics course," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 269-287, October.
    4. Zhou, Peng, 2024. "Make Lectures Match How We Learn: The Nonlinear Teaching Approach to Economics," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2024/12, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    5. Becker, Ralf & Proud, Steven, 2018. "Flipping quantitative tutorials," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 59-73.
    6. Fritz Dresselhaus & Jessika A. Bohlmann & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2015. "Assessing the impact of just-in-time methodology, in-lecture activities, and tutor-assisted post-lecture activities in the course experience of first year students in Economics at the University of Pretoria," ERSA Working Paper Series 562, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    7. Wei Chen & Sadiah Binti Baharom & Sopia Binti Md Yassin, 2023. "Does Flipped Classroom Approach Impact on Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety of First-year Chinese Urban-rural Pre-service Teachers?," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(7), pages 430-430, September.
    8. Jia Suo & Xiuying Hou, 2017. "A Study on the Motivational Strategies in College English Flipped Classroom," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 1-62, May.
    9. Lombardini, Chiara & Lakkala, Minna & Muukkonen, Hanni, 2018. "The impact of the flipped classroom in a principles of microeconomics course: evidence from a quasi-experiment with two flipped classroom designs," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-28.
    10. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    11. Kana Okano & Jakub R Kaczmarzyk & John D E Gabrieli, 2018. "Enhancing workplace digital learning by use of the science of learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, October.
    12. Blerta Prevalla Etemi & Huseyin Uzunboylu & Shpetim Latifi & Ulzharkyn Abdigapbarova, 2024. "The Effect of the Flipped Learning Approach on Engineering Students’ Technology Acceptance and Self-Directed Learning Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Hosam El-Sawy, 2018. "Flipping EFL University Classes with Blackboard System," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-31, February.
    14. Patricia Bachiller & Guillermo Badía, 2020. "The Flip Teaching as Tool to Improving Students’ Sustainable Learning Performance in a Financial Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    15. Journal, Arab World English AWEJ & Khalil, Rania M Rafik & Shahu, Khalid, 2017. "Assessment as a Learning Tool in a Flipped English Language Classroom in Higher Education," OSF Preprints xnmne, Center for Open Science.
    16. Mustafa Cevikbas & Gabriele Kaiser, 2022. "Promoting Personalized Learning in Flipped Classrooms: A Systematic Review Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Duncan Watson & Louise Parker, 2016. "The hullaballoo over e-learning? Technology and pluralism in economics," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1159813-115, December.
    18. Todd Broker & Victor Raj & Simone Silva, 2018. "Flipping the Econ Class: Reconsidered," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 18(2), pages 1-21, Fall.
    19. Kevin Deane & Julia Chukwuma, 2025. "Introducing Economics Students to Marxist Political Economy: Mental and Physical Health in the Workplace," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 57(3), pages 485-494, September.
    20. Henria May Ybañez & Jonel H. Donaire & Jhea Escabusa & John Paul Hernandez & Normina Malik & Norlia Macaligis & Danica Amancio & Alkhaser V. Sappayani, 2024. "“Students’ Preparedness on the Implementation of Flipped Teaching Approach in Davao Central Collegeâ€," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(5), pages 937-947, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15349-:d:1268441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.