IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0206250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing workplace digital learning by use of the science of learning

Author

Listed:
  • Kana Okano
  • Jakub R Kaczmarzyk
  • John D E Gabrieli

Abstract

Digital learning is becoming the most commonly used portal for workplace learning, but its effectiveness is not clearly understood. We studied 99 employees on-site in a large company as they watched an already used and required training video. Employees were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (1) a baseline condition of watching the video as in current practice; (2) a spontaneous discussion condition in which participants discussed the video with colleagues immediately after the video without any guidelines; (3) a structured discussion condition in which participants discussed the video with colleagues immediately after the video with an instructor guiding discussion topics; and (4) a testing condition in which test questions were interpolated throughout the video. Memory for the content of the video was measured on a recognition memory test completed 20–35 hours after watching the video. Employees who were in the interpolated-testing or structured discussion conditions had significantly superior memory for the video content (26% and 25% better respectively) relative to typical video viewing; spontaneous discussion did not enhance memory for content. These findings demonstrate that interpolated testing and structured discussion enhance information retention in the workplace and point to how learning science may accelerate workplace learning more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Kana Okano & Jakub R Kaczmarzyk & John D E Gabrieli, 2018. "Enhancing workplace digital learning by use of the science of learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206250
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206250
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0206250&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0206250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maureen J. Lage & Glenn J. Platt & Michael Treglia, 2000. "Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 30-43, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Ferreira dos Santos & Lilia Ribeiro Guerra & Bruno Leal Alves & Selma Ribeiro de Paiva & Ana Lafetá Cabral & Helena C. Castro* & Ana Joffily*, 2018. "Teaching Biotechnology: A Demand Still to be Fully Attended," Journal of Biotechnology Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(4), pages 13-18, 04-2018.
    2. Lisbeth Amhag, 2017. "Mobile-Assisted Seamless Learning Activities in Higher Distance Education," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(3), pages 1-70, August.
    3. Rita A. Balaban & Donna B. Gilleskie & Uyen Tran, 2016. "A quantitative evaluation of the flipped classroom in a large lecture principles of economics course," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 269-287, October.
    4. Becker, Ralf & Proud, Steven, 2018. "Flipping quantitative tutorials," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 59-73.
    5. Fritz Dresselhaus & Jessika A. Bohlmann & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2015. "Assessing the impact of just-in-time methodology, in-lecture activities, and tutor-assisted post-lecture activities in the course experience of first year students in Economics at the University of Pr," Working Papers 562, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    6. Wei Chen & Sadiah Binti Baharom & Sopia Binti Md Yassin, 2023. "Does Flipped Classroom Approach Impact on Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety of First-year Chinese Urban-rural Pre-service Teachers?," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(7), pages 430-430, September.
    7. Jia Suo & Xiuying Hou, 2017. "A Study on the Motivational Strategies in College English Flipped Classroom," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 1-62, May.
    8. Lombardini, Chiara & Lakkala, Minna & Muukkonen, Hanni, 2018. "The impact of the flipped classroom in a principles of microeconomics course: evidence from a quasi-experiment with two flipped classroom designs," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-28.
    9. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    10. Blerta Prevalla Etemi & Huseyin Uzunboylu & Shpetim Latifi & Ulzharkyn Abdigapbarova, 2024. "The Effect of the Flipped Learning Approach on Engineering Students’ Technology Acceptance and Self-Directed Learning Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Hosam El-Sawy, 2018. "Flipping EFL University Classes with Blackboard System," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-31, February.
    12. Patricia Bachiller & Guillermo Badía, 2020. "The Flip Teaching as Tool to Improving Students’ Sustainable Learning Performance in a Financial Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    13. Journal, Arab World English AWEJ & Khalil, Rania M Rafik & Shahu, Khalid, 2017. "Assessment as a Learning Tool in a Flipped English Language Classroom in Higher Education," OSF Preprints xnmne, Center for Open Science.
    14. Mustafa Cevikbas & Gabriele Kaiser, 2022. "Promoting Personalized Learning in Flipped Classrooms: A Systematic Review Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Duncan Watson & Louise Parker, 2016. "The hullaballoo over e-learning? Technology and pluralism in economics," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1159813-115, December.
    16. Todd Broker & Victor Raj & Simone Silva, 2018. "Flipping the Econ Class: Reconsidered," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 18(2), pages 1-21, Fall.
    17. repec:thr:techub:10010:y:2020:i:1:p:142-155 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Hossein Hossein-Mohand & Juan-Manuel Trujillo-Torres & Melchor Gómez-García & Hassan Hossein-Mohand & Antonio Campos-Soto, 2021. "Analysis of the Use and Integration of the Flipped Learning Model, Project-Based Learning, and Gamification Methodologies by Secondary School Mathematics Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Olitsky, Neal H. & Cosgrove, Sarah B., 2016. "The better blend? Flipping the principles of microeconomics classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-11.
    20. Josephson, Anna & DeBoer, Lawrence & Nelson, David & Zissimopoulos, Angelika, 2016. "Reshaped for Higher Order Learning: Student Outcomes in the Redesign of an Undergraduate Macroeconomics Course," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235765, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    21. Pezzino, Mario, 2018. "Online assessment, adaptive feedback and the importance of visual learning for students. The advantages, with a few caveats, of using MapleTA," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 11-28.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0206250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.