IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p774-d1320176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of the Flipped Learning Approach on Engineering Students’ Technology Acceptance and Self-Directed Learning Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Blerta Prevalla Etemi

    (Department of Computing and Information Technologies, Rochester Institute of Technology, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo)

  • Huseyin Uzunboylu

    (Higher Education Planning, Supervision, Accreditation and Coordination Board, Lefkosa 99010, North Cyprus, Turkey
    Department of Primary Education, The Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology, Abai KazNPU, 050010 Almaty, Kazakhstan
    Faculty of Education, University of Kyrenia, Kyrenia 98030, North Cyprus, Turkey)

  • Shpetim Latifi

    (Faculty of Computer Science, AAB College, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo)

  • Ulzharkyn Abdigapbarova

    (Department of Primary Education, The Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology, Abai KazNPU, 050010 Almaty, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

The contemporary landscape of education is witnessing a paradigm shift toward innovative instructional methods, with the flipped learning approach gaining considerable attention. The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of the flipped learning approach on students’ perception and acceptance throughout an entire semester in the ‘Introduction to Programming with Java’ course. The research utilized a research design with a quantitative approach, ultimately aiming to inform educational practice and advance our knowledge of innovative teaching methods in higher education. This study was conducted at a university with 174 students involved, divided into two groups: 87 students in the experimental group and 87 students in the control group. The data collected through the scales were analyzed by using descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques in statistical software. At the end of the measurements, the technology acceptance level and self-directed learning perceptions of engineering students who received education with flipped learning were high. The results suggest that educators should consider students’ readiness for self-directed learning when implementing the flipped learning approach and focus on creating an environment that supports their autonomy and engagement. This research offers valuable guidance for instructors, curriculum designers, and educational policymakers seeking to enhance the effectiveness of flipped learning in higher education courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Blerta Prevalla Etemi & Huseyin Uzunboylu & Shpetim Latifi & Ulzharkyn Abdigapbarova, 2024. "The Effect of the Flipped Learning Approach on Engineering Students’ Technology Acceptance and Self-Directed Learning Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:774-:d:1320176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/774/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/774/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minkyung Gu & Sohyune Sok, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Academic Achievement of Nursing College Students in a Flipped Learning Simulation Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Maureen J. Lage & Glenn J. Platt & Michael Treglia, 2000. "Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 30-43, December.
    3. Gabrielle T. Lee & Tzu-Fen Chang, 2019. "Evaluating the Use of an Online Video Training Program to Supplement a Graduate Course in Applied Behavior Analysis," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 21-32, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Ferreira dos Santos & Lilia Ribeiro Guerra & Bruno Leal Alves & Selma Ribeiro de Paiva & Ana Lafetá Cabral & Helena C. Castro* & Ana Joffily*, 2018. "Teaching Biotechnology: A Demand Still to be Fully Attended," Journal of Biotechnology Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(4), pages 13-18, 04-2018.
    2. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    3. Kana Okano & Jakub R Kaczmarzyk & John D E Gabrieli, 2018. "Enhancing workplace digital learning by use of the science of learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, October.
    4. Duncan Watson & Louise Parker, 2016. "The hullaballoo over e-learning? Technology and pluralism in economics," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1159813-115, December.
    5. Jill Caviglia‐Harris, 2016. "Flipping the Undergraduate Economics Classroom: Using Online Videos to Enhance Teaching and Learning," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 321-331, July.
    6. Smith, Kasee L. & Johnson, Aaron J. & Johnson, Dain R., 2021. "Flipping Together: A Collaborative Approach to a Flipped Class," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2(6), January.
    7. Samah Zakareya & Safa’a Alahmad, 2019. "Inverted Teaching for Improving the Teaching Performance of EFL Student Teachers at Jubail College of Education," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Luyan Zheng & Keok Cheong Lee, 2023. "Examining the Effects of “Small Private Online Course and Flipped-Classroom”-Based Blended Teaching Strategy on First-Year English-Major Students’ Achievements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    9. Gulley, O. David & Jackson, Aaron L., 2016. "A case study on using instructor-recorded videos in an upper level economics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 28-33.
    10. Meginnis, Keila & Campbell, Danny, 2017. "Students’ preferences for attributes of postgraduate economics modules: Evidence from a multi-profile best-worst scaling survey," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 18-27.
    11. Cho Naing & Maxine A. Whittaker & Htar Htar Aung & Dinesh Kumar Chellappan & Amy Riegelman, 2023. "The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    12. Boulatoff, Catherine & Cyrus, Teresa L., 2022. "Improving student outcomes in large introductory courses," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    13. Vahé Nerguizian & Radhi Mhiri & Catherine Mounier & Daniel Lemieux & Adel Omar Dahmane, 2014. "Flipping from Flipped Classroom to Multimodal Mobile Learning (MML)," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0802617, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    14. Hala Dalbani & Safaa Eissa & Sharifah Fatimah Syed-Ahmad & Norah Almusharraf, 2022. "Transitioning to Flipped Classrooms: Instructors’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    15. Aricò, Fabio R. & Lancaster, Simon J., 2018. "Facilitating active learning and enhancing student self-assessment skills," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 6-13.
    16. Patrick Conway & Derek Stimel & Ann E. Davis & Monica Hartmann, 2010. "Case Use in Economics Instruction," Chapters, in: Michael K. Salemi & William B. Walstad (ed.), Teaching Innovations in Economics, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Adam Butt, 2014. "Student Views On The Use Of A Flipped Classroom Approach: Evidence From Australia," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(1), pages 33-43.
    18. Joseph T. Lizier & Michael S. Harré & Melanie Mitchell & Simon DeDeo & Conor Finn & Kristian Lindgren & Amanda L. Lizier & Hiroki Sayama, 2018. "An Interview-Based Study of Pioneering Experiences in Teaching and Learning Complex Systems in Higher Education," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, November.
    19. Samah Ahmad, 2016. "The Flipped Classroom Model to Develop Egyptian EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(9), pages 166-166, September.
    20. Gemma Abió & Manuela Alcáñiz & Marta Gómez-Puig & Gloria Rubert & Mónica Serrano & Alexandrina Stoyanova & Montserrat Vilalta-Bufí, 2016. "“Retaking a course in Economics: Innovative methodologies to simulate academic performance in large groups”," IREA Working Papers 201609, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Apr 2016.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:774-:d:1320176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.