IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14880-d1260012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Transportation Carbon Emission Peak Prediction and Judgment System in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanming Sun

    (College of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
    International Cooperation Center of National Development and Reform Commission, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Yile Yang

    (College of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Shixian Liu

    (College of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Qingli Li

    (International Cooperation Center of National Development and Reform Commission, Beijing 100038, China)

Abstract

The transportation sector is a major contributor to carbon emissions, and managing its carbon peak is essential for China to reach the 2030 carbon peak target. This paper uses the autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA) to design baseline scenarios and “double carbon” scenarios (carbon peak and carbon neutrality) based on the accounting of transportation carbon emissions in 30 provinces and cities in China to facilitate regional differentiation and forecast the development trend of transportation carbon emissions. Using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, a comprehensive transportation carbon emission research and judgment system has been developed based on the forecast results. The research indicates a substantial increase in carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions from transport in China over the past 15 years, with an average growth rate of 5.9%, from 387.42 mt in 2005 to 917.00 mt in 2019. In the scenario prediction analysis, the overall carbon emission of the “two-carbon” scenario exhibits varying levels of reduction compared with the baseline scenario. According to the comprehensive research and judgment system, when the comprehensive evaluation index corresponding to the turning point year of transportation carbon emissions is greater than 0.85, and the index remains above 0.85 after the turning point, it can be judged that a region has achieved the peak of transportation carbon dioxide emissions under 95% possibility. It shows that China ’ s policies and strategies for carbon and emission reduction have played a significant role in transportation, but the low-carbon transformation and development still face great challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanming Sun & Yile Yang & Shixian Liu & Qingli Li, 2023. "Research on Transportation Carbon Emission Peak Prediction and Judgment System in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14880-:d:1260012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14880/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14880/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junwei Gao & Lingying Pan, 2022. "A System Dynamic Analysis of Urban Development Paths under Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Targets: A Case Study of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Zhou, Guanghui & Chung, William & Zhang, Xiliang, 2013. "A study of carbon dioxide emissions performance of China's transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 302-314.
    3. Changzheng Zhu & Meng Wang & Yarong Yang, 2020. "Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Regional Carbon Emissions in the Chinese Transportation Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Yunlong Liu & Leiyu Chen & Chengfeng Huang, 2022. "Study on the Carbon Emission Spillover Effects of Transportation under Technological Advancements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Fernández-Dacosta, Cora & Shen, Li & Schakel, Wouter & Ramirez, Andrea & Kramer, Gert Jan, 2019. "Potential and challenges of low-carbon energy options: Comparative assessment of alternative fuels for the transport sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 590-606.
    6. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Differences in regional emissions in China's transport sector: Determinants and reduction strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 459-470.
    7. Yanming Sun & Shixian Liu & Lei Li, 2022. "Grey Correlation Analysis of Transportation Carbon Emissions under the Background of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, April.
    8. Yong Wang & Yu Zhou & Lin Zhu & Fei Zhang & Yingchun Zhang, 2018. "Influencing Factors and Decoupling Elasticity of China’s Transportation Carbon Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, May.
    9. Byers, Edward A. & Gasparatos, Alexandros & Serrenho, André C., 2015. "A framework for the exergy analysis of future transport pathways: Application for the United Kingdom transport system 2010–2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 849-862.
    10. Tang, Bao-Jun & Li, Xiao-Yi & Yu, Biying & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2019. "Sustainable development pathway for intercity passenger transport: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ling Hou & Huichao Chen, 2024. "The Prediction of Medium- and Long-Term Trends in Urban Carbon Emissions Based on an ARIMA-BPNN Combination Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanming Sun & Shixian Liu & Lei Li, 2022. "Grey Correlation Analysis of Transportation Carbon Emissions under the Background of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Shuai Zhang & Xiaoman Zhao & Changwei Yuan & Xiu Wang, 2020. "Technological Bias and Its Influencing Factors in Sustainable Development of China’s Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Du, Huibin & Chen, Zhenni & Peng, Binbin & Southworth, Frank & Ma, Shoufeng & Wang, Yuan, 2019. "What drives CO2 emissions from the transport sector? A linkage analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 195-204.
    4. Changyou Zhang & Wenyu Zhang & Weina Luo & Xue Gao & Bingchen Zhang, 2021. "Analysis of Influencing Factors of Carbon Emissions in China’s Logistics Industry: A GDIM-Based Indicator Decomposition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Tianxiang Lv & Xu Wu, 2019. "Using Panel Data to Evaluate the Factors Affecting Transport Energy Consumption in China’s Three Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Quan Wu & Wei Cheng & Zuoxiong Zheng & Guangjun Zhang & Haicheng Xiao & Chuan Wen, 2023. "Research on the Carbon Credit Exchange Strategy for Scrap Vehicles Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Liu, Zhao & Zhou, Si-Ming & Qin, Chang-Xiong & Zhang, Huan, 2018. "The impact of China's Central Rise Policy on carbon emissions at the stage of operation in road sector," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 159-173.
    8. Wang, Xianzhu & Huang, He & Hong, Jingke & Ni, Danfei & He, Rongxiao, 2020. "A spatiotemporal investigation of energy-driven factors in China: A region-based structural decomposition analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Li, Jianglong & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 366-378.
    11. Wu, Tian & Shen, Qu & Xu, Ming & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2018. "Development and application of an energy use and CO2 emissions reduction evaluation model for China's online car hailing services," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 298-307.
    12. Hafezi, Reza & Akhavan, AmirNaser & Pakseresht, Saeed & Wood, David A., 2019. "A Layered Uncertainties Scenario Synthesizing (LUSS) model applied to evaluate multiple potential long-run outcomes for Iran's natural gas exports," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 646-659.
    13. Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin & Yuan, Zhiyi & Yan, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Xiliang, 2018. "Development and application of China provincial road transport energy demand and GHG emissions analysis model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 313-328.
    14. Robaina, Margarita & Neves, Ana, 2021. "Complete decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions intensity in the transport sector in Europe," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. AlSabbagh, Maha & Siu, Yim Ling & Guehnemann, Astrid & Barrett, John, 2017. "Integrated approach to the assessment of CO2e-mitigation measures for the road passenger transport sector in Bahrain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 203-215.
    16. Jialin Liu & Yi Zhu & Qun Zhang & Fangyan Cheng & Xi Hu & Xinhong Cui & Lang Zhang & Zhenglin Sun, 2020. "Transportation Carbon Emissions from a Perspective of Sustainable Development in Major Cities of Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Desantes, J.M. & Novella, R. & Pla, B. & Lopez-Juarez, M., 2021. "Impact of fuel cell range extender powertrain design on greenhouse gases and NOX emissions in automotive applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    18. Ke Liu & Xinyue Xie & Mingxue Zhao & Qian Zhou, 2022. "Carbon Emissions in the Yellow River Basin: Analysis of Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors Based on a Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) Decomposition Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Behrouz Arabi & Susila Munisamy Doraisamy & Ali Emrouznejad & Alireza Khoshroo, 2017. "Eco-efficiency measurement and material balance principle: an application in power plants Malmquist Luenberger Index," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 221-239, August.
    20. Ling Shen & Fengming Tao & Songyi Wang, 2018. "Multi-Depot Open Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows Based on Carbon Trading," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14880-:d:1260012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.