IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2749-d1364419.html

Pyrolysis as a Method for Processing of Waste from Production of Cultivated Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)

Author

Listed:
  • Bogdan Saletnik

    (Department of Bioenergetics, Food Analysis and Microbiology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, College of Natural Science, Rzeszow University, Ćwiklińskiej 2D, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Marcin Fiedur

    (Department of Bioenergetics, Food Analysis and Microbiology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, College of Natural Science, Rzeszow University, Ćwiklińskiej 2D, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Radosław Kwarciany

    (Department of Bioenergetics, Food Analysis and Microbiology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, College of Natural Science, Rzeszow University, Ćwiklińskiej 2D, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Zaguła

    (Department of Bioenergetics, Food Analysis and Microbiology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, College of Natural Science, Rzeszow University, Ćwiklińskiej 2D, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Marcin Bajcar

    (Department of Bioenergetics, Food Analysis and Microbiology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, College of Natural Science, Rzeszow University, Ćwiklińskiej 2D, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland)

Abstract

Because of the current energy crisis, researchers are looking into new potential substrates for production of biofuels and for possible ways to enhance their parameters. In line with such efforts, the current study focuses on the feasibility of processing waste from the production of cultivated tobacco. The aim of this study was to assess the potential of tobacco waste as a raw material for the production of solid biofuels, such as biochar produced through pyrolysis, and to determine its basic physicochemical properties, compared to other materials used for the production of green fuels. The analyses showed calorific values of 16.16 MJ kg −1 for the raw biomass and those in the range of 24.16–27.32 MJ kg −1 for the products of pyrolysis conducted at temperatures of 400–500 °C and with a heating time in the range of 5 to 15 min. To address the safety-related issues, the study also measured the explosion index (Kst max), which, in the raw biomass, amounted to 72.62 bar s −1 and in the biochar was in the range between 82.42 and 88.11 bar s −1 . The registered maximum explosion pressure was 7.37 bar in the case of raw biomass, whereas in the biochars, the value ranged from 8.09 to 8.94 bar. The findings show that tobacco waste has parameters comparable to those identified in the case of other solid biofuels, whereas the process of pyrolysis enhances the energy-related parameters without increasing the explosion class of the product.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogdan Saletnik & Marcin Fiedur & Radosław Kwarciany & Grzegorz Zaguła & Marcin Bajcar, 2024. "Pyrolysis as a Method for Processing of Waste from Production of Cultivated Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2749-:d:1364419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Pietrzak, Michał Bernard & Kiełkowska, Urszula & Skrzatek, Mateusz & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Piechota, Grzegorz, 2022. "The assessment of renewable energy in Poland on the background of the world renewable energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    2. Buhari Doğan & Oana M. Driha & Daniel Balsalobre Lorente & Umer Shahzad, 2021. "The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Jakub Styks & Marek Wróbel & Jarosław Frączek & Adrian Knapczyk, 2020. "Effect of Compaction Pressure and Moisture Content on Quality Parameters of Perennial Biomass Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Phuakpunk, Kiattikhoon & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai, 2022. "Pyrolysis kinetic parameters investigation of single and tri-component biomass: Models fitting via comparative model-free methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 494-507.
    5. Fernández-Dacosta, Cora & Shen, Li & Schakel, Wouter & Ramirez, Andrea & Kramer, Gert Jan, 2019. "Potential and challenges of low-carbon energy options: Comparative assessment of alternative fuels for the transport sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 590-606.
    6. Adam Kleofas Berbeć & Mariusz Matyka, 2020. "Biomass Characteristics and Energy Yields of Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) Cultivated in Eastern Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrycja Pochwatka & Alina Kowalczyk-Juśko & Marek Pituła & Andrzej Mazur & Iryna Vaskina & Jacek Dach, 2025. "Energetic Potential of Tobacco Waste Within Combustion or Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daria Sosnina & Andrey Altynov & Maria Kirgina & Ilya Bogdanov, 2024. "Production of Motor Fuel Components by Processing Vegetable Oils Using a CoMo/Al 2 O 3 Hydrotreating Catalyst and a ZSM-5 Zeolite Catalyst," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Czekała, Wojciech & Łukomska, Aleksandra & Pulka, Jakub & Bojarski, Wiktor & Pochwatka, Patrycja & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Oniszczuk, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "Waste-to-energy: Biogas potential of waste from coffee production and consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Quinten De Wettinck & Karolien De Bruyne & Wouter Bam & C'esar A. Hidalgo, 2025. "Economic Complexity Alignment and Sustainable Development," Papers 2509.17919, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    5. Kristiana Dolge & Dagnija Blumberga, 2023. "Transitioning to Clean Energy: A Comprehensive Analysis of Renewable Electricity Generation in the EU-27," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Francisco García-Lillo & Eduardo Sánchez-García & Bartolomé Marco-Lajara & Pedro Seva-Larrosa, 2023. "Renewable Energies and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Juhász, Sándor & Wachs, Johannes & Kaminski, Jermain & Hidalgo, César A., 2026. "The software complexity of nations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(3).
    8. Bharath, G. & Karthikeyan, G. & Kumar, Anuj & Prakash, J. & Venkatasubbu, Devanand & Kumar Nadda, Ashok & Kumar Gupta, Vijai & Abu Haija, Mohammad & Banat, Fawzi, 2022. "Surface engineering of Au nanostructures for plasmon-enhanced electrochemical reduction of N2 and CO2 into urea in the visible-NIR region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    9. Ngo Thai Hung, 2022. "Effect of economic indicators, biomass energy on human development in China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(5), pages 829-852, August.
    10. Baek, Seungju & Lee, Sanguk & Shin, Myunghwan & Lee, Jongtae & Lee, Kihyung, 2022. "Analysis of combustion and exhaust characteristics according to changes in the propane content of LPG," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    11. Jakub Styks & Marek Wróbel, 2024. "Modular Open Chamber Stand for Biomass Densification Using the Example of Miscanthus × Giganteus Greef Et Deu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Doğan, Buhari & Khalfaoui, Rabeh & Bergougui, Brahim & Ghosh, Sudeshna, 2025. "Unveiling the impact of the digital economy on the interplay of energy transition, environmental transformation, and renewable energy adoption," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Xin Dai & Tianshan Ma & Enyi Zhou, 2023. "New Energy Commuting Optimization under Low-Carbon Orientation: A Case Study of Xi’an Metropolitan Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Usman Mehmood, 2024. "Analyzing the Role of Political Risk, GDP, and Eco-Innovations Towards CO2 Emissions in South Asian Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 2121-2135, March.
    15. Lee, Chi-Chuan & Fang, Yuzhu, 2025. "Climate finance for energy security: An empirical analysis from a global perspective," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 963-978.
    16. Mirela Panait & Ștefan Iacob & Cătălin Voica & Viorela Iacovoiu & Daniela Iov & Carmen Mincă & Cristian Teodorescu, 2024. "Navigating through the Storm—The Challenges of the Energy Transition in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Zeynep Clulow & David M. Reiner, 2022. "Democracy, Economic Development and Low-Carbon Energy: When and Why Does Democratization Promote Energy Transition?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Nibas Chandra Deb & Jayanta Kumar Basak & Bhola Paudel & Sijan Karki & Dae-yeong Kang & Seong-woo Jeon & Eun-wan Seo & Junghoo Kook & Myeong-yong Kang & Hyeon-tae Kim, 2024. "Estimation of Energy Balance throughout the Growing–Finishing Stage of Pigs in an Experimental Pig Barn," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Yang, Shiying & Jiao, Fan & Liu, Taixiu & Weng, Yixin & Long, Yibiao & Liu, Qibin, 2025. "Efficient, low-carbon H2 and CO production system based on solar methane carbon cyclic reforming: energy, exergy, and environmental assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    20. Sakariyahu, Rilwan & Lawal, Rodiat & Etudaiye-Muhtar, Oyebola Fatima & Ajide, Folorunsho Monsuru, 2023. "Reflections on COP27: How do technological innovations and economic freedom affect environmental quality in Africa?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2749-:d:1364419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.